Scarpy
You are invited to the Great Colorado Wiknic
editWho: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users and their families and friends are invited.
What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016.
When: Sunday afternoon, June 26, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.
Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.
Sponsor: WikiProject Colorado
Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)
The Signpost: 17 February 2026
edit- In the media: Global powers see Wikipedia as fundamental target for manipulation
Attempted Wikipedia shenanigans apparent from Epstein, AI, various governments.
- News and notes: Discussions open for the next WMF Annual Plan
Plus, WikiFlix going places, steady progress on older FAs and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- Serendipity: Maintenance crews continue to slog through Wikipedia's oldest Featured Articles
Hundreds of old FAs have been triaged since project began, but thousands remain — and they need reviewers.
- Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
- Technology report: Wikidata Graph Split and how we address major challenges
A personal perspective on a major update to the Wikimedia social machine.
- Traffic report: Deaths, killings, films, and the Olympics
I'll have the usual!
- Opinion: Incoming Incurables
A poem for Wikipedia Day 2026.
- Crossword: Pop quiz
Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?
- Comix: herculean
efforts.
The Signpost: 10 March 2026
edit- Interview: Bernadette Meehan, new Wikimedia Foundation CEO
Part 2.
- News and notes: Security testing unleashes computer worm on Meta-wiki
Dormant worm awakes; a sketchy archiving site struck; ether burns.
- Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?
- In the media: Indonesian government blocks Wikimedia logins; archive site scoured from Wikipedia after owner runs malware
As well as controversy over LLM translations.
- Recent research: To wiki, perchance to groki
Comparisons continue.
- Obituary: Madhav Gadgil, Fredrick Brennan, Mark Miller, Chip Berlet
Rest in peace.
- Opinion: Interface administrators and trusting trust
Potential attacks are the logical consequence of giving a group of users unlimited control over JavaScript.
- Technology report: English Wikipedia deprecates archive.today after DDoS against blog, altered content
After the archive site launched a DDoS campaign against a small blog in January 2026, a request for comment was started, with consensus to deprecate the site used almost 700 thousand times.
- Op-ed: Why is "Trypsin-sensitive photosynthetic activities in chloroplast membranes" cited in "List of tallest buildings in Chicago"?
The answer is slop.
- Essay: The pursuit of a button click
Volunteering for Wikipedia has its rewards. The thank-button, for example.
- In focus: Short descriptions: One year later
A discussion of the challenge set forth to the Wikipedia community one year ago!
- WikiProject report: Unreferenced articles backlog drive
Unreferenced articles in English Wikipedia - help us in the backlog drive!
- Community view: Speaking of planning ...
The WMF planning process is underway.
- Traffic report: Over the mountain, kissing silver inlaid clouds
Death and the Winter Olympics.
- Crossword: "It will never happen"
Want to take a break?
- Comix: BRIEn't
Or is it.
March 2026
edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Allen House (Boulder, Colorado) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- You gave done this to multiple pages. Please check your edits. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:57, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- The Infobxes are inconsisent - and I don't see any visual feedback when a parameter is wrong. - Scarpy (talk) 03:00, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- If you use preview, you will see a nice big red warning of which parameters are wrong. Them not being consistent is not a valid excuse as all the issues you presented were the same infobox... {{Infobox building}}. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:02, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- You're saying if I restore, on the Egan page for example, and preview, I'll see text pointing this out? - Scarpy (talk)
- Oh yeah it does. Okay I will do that from now on. - Scarpy (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- Related - why is there so much variance between all of these infoboxes? Some of them are completely useless because of it. Like the infobox for yacht clubs is pointless. - Scarpy (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- It is a well known problem... Every Infobox is created by someone different and they don't always follow the same guidelines. Something we are trying to fix... But you always need to check the preview and check the documentation.... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why is it different from citation templates and other things where issues are visible in the preview and in the article if they're not corrected? And what material problems does this cause? Is there a way to check without doing a preview? Like you must have something that alerts you when this happens, can I just check whatever that is? - Scarpy (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- You can check the unknown parameter category related to the template you are using... But that is actually more work. Previewing your edits is a basic requirement of editing... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:56, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I take your point and I get that is is frustrating for you, though I'm baffled as to why. Again, what's the material consequence here other than that some information may not display in an infobox? I'll preview because I don't like the talk page noise. But no where is it listed that previewing is a basic requirement for editing in WP:EDITING or any place else I'm aware of or can find. - Scarpy (talk) 04:04, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- If you do not preview your edits, you have no idea what they will look like. You clearly are not checking your work at all as the information you are entering into the Infoboxes is not showing up on the page as you are using invalid code. Not really interested in going in circles with you. If you want to be a constructive member of the editing community, please check your work properly. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- Now you're making a different argument. I think we can agree that previewing is a best practice, but not a requirement for editing. I've made a lot of valuable contributions to Wikipedia over the course of 16,000 edits and 19 years. Anyone who cares to look can see that, and would see that the quality of my contributions speaks for themselves. I asked several good faith questions that have went unanswered. That's not going around in circles, that's just being curious. - Scarpy (talk) 04:11, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- If you do not preview your edits, you have no idea what they will look like. You clearly are not checking your work at all as the information you are entering into the Infoboxes is not showing up on the page as you are using invalid code. Not really interested in going in circles with you. If you want to be a constructive member of the editing community, please check your work properly. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I take your point and I get that is is frustrating for you, though I'm baffled as to why. Again, what's the material consequence here other than that some information may not display in an infobox? I'll preview because I don't like the talk page noise. But no where is it listed that previewing is a basic requirement for editing in WP:EDITING or any place else I'm aware of or can find. - Scarpy (talk) 04:04, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- You can check the unknown parameter category related to the template you are using... But that is actually more work. Previewing your edits is a basic requirement of editing... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:56, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why is it different from citation templates and other things where issues are visible in the preview and in the article if they're not corrected? And what material problems does this cause? Is there a way to check without doing a preview? Like you must have something that alerts you when this happens, can I just check whatever that is? - Scarpy (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- It is a well known problem... Every Infobox is created by someone different and they don't always follow the same guidelines. Something we are trying to fix... But you always need to check the preview and check the documentation.... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- If you use preview, you will see a nice big red warning of which parameters are wrong. Them not being consistent is not a valid excuse as all the issues you presented were the same infobox... {{Infobox building}}. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:02, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- The Infobxes are inconsisent - and I don't see any visual feedback when a parameter is wrong. - Scarpy (talk) 03:00, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denver Film Festival, a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of Hope (film) was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
File:Hiawatha Theatre (proleptically Esquire Theatre) Denver 1927 opening.jpg listed for discussion
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hiawatha Theatre (proleptically Esquire Theatre) Denver 1927 opening.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 00:03, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
- The photograph depicts the theater in late 1927, but the digital file was sourced from the Denver Landmark Preservation Commission’s 2024 staff report (denvergov.org PDF), not from a confirmed pre-1928 publication. The original publication venue of the photograph have not been established. Until the image can be located in a specific pre-1928 source such as a contemporary newspaper, the pre-1930 PD assumption is unverified and the non-free use rationale under NFCC should be retained. If a pre-1928 publication can be confirmed, I’m happy to re-upload to Commons with the appropriate PD tag. Scarpy (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
- I am withdrawing the FfD nomination per this comment. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 01:31, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 March 2026
edit- News and notes: Entirety of Wikinews to be shut down
All languages to be shut down in May; first AI agent blocked; new name for AfD?
- In the media: AI ban, newspapers disrupt archiving; and antisemitism complaints
Perennial challenges with AI, demographic representation, and attacks from people buying media influence.
- Community view: Videos from WikiConference North America 2025 in NYC
In attendees' own words.
- Disinformation report: Cleaning up after Jeffrey Epstein, Peter Nygard, and Mohamed Al-Fayed
Countering the edits of the rich and dangerous.
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2025 in NYC review
About the conference series, and this conference particularly.
- Obituary: Dr. Subas Chandra Rout
Rest in peace.
- Traffic report: Call in the dogs of war, soldier of fortune
Though of course the picture needs to be Chuck Norris...
- Gallery: Canadian Rangers participate in Operation Enduring Encyclopedia
Analogies between how Wikipedia works and how Canada works.
- Comix: n00bsitting
...!
The Signpost: 21 April 2026
edit- News and notes: Six Serbian Wikipedia editors banned following controversy about political bias
Plus, new bans for AI-generated content in place, a new drop in active admins, pranks on pranks, May admin election, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- In the media: Could Wikipedia be involved in Massachusetts' proposed social media ban for minors?
Another regulate-the-internet attempt casts a wide net.
- Gallery: March equinox
The progression of seasons in March.
- Traffic report: Time to change my galaxy in case, we outta space!
What catches the reader's eye? Death and film, per usual, and a loop around the moon per unusual.
- Comix: Of skirts and articles
When significant coverage is only skin deep.
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esquire Theatre (Denver), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brown Palace Hotel was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Online meeting May 12
edit| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
We will host an online meeting for Wikipedia users in the Mountain States from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 12, 2026, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We will discuss the new CARUSCA organization and how users in each of our states can help one another. Help is available for new users, and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations anymore, please remove your username from our invitation list. Thanks.
Testing find link
editThe Signpost: 22 May 2026
edit- News and notes: Offline: Osama Khalid still in prison
He has been imprisoned since 2020 for his Wikipedia edits. A fresh campaign is calling for his release.
- In the media: Indonesian editors, you shall return!
And lawspam, may you be away.
- Disinformation report: Who is a typical paid editor? Who are their typical clients?
Remember the golden rule!
- Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
- Traffic report: This is where I'll be, so heavenly, so come and dance with me Michael!
A real off the wall thriller, invincible, can't beat it, or is it dangerous and just bad?
- Forum: WikiAnnotate: help us build a dataset of article quality evaluations
A research project to build better automated article assessment tools.
- In focus: Demystifying the 2026-27 Annual Plan
A guide to WMF's Tech Annual Plan for the next year.
- Opinion: Wikipedia isn't a battleground. So why does it feel like one?
Do we really have to fight?
- Serendipity: Wikinews: Into the Wikiverse
The early suggestions for what the wiki could have been.
- Special report: Wikimedia Foundation closes Wikinews after 21 years
Displaces 700 active editors among 31 language editions.
- Community view: Wikipedia's traffic drop: more on languages and freshness
Which topics are dropping, and is the pattern the same everywhere?
- Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).
- Comix: Brother, can you spare a page?
What would you say?
LLM use
edit
Please refrain from creating articles using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such a technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as Cohen Media Group, even if you intend to fix them later. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

The article Lakeside Leagues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
page created using AI, violation of WP:NEWLLM
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. DraconicDark (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you edit Wikipedia using a large language model, which is prohibited. DraconicDark (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
- @DraconicDark Hey thanks for this. @JTtheOG and I had this discussion on Talk:Clayton_Long_Trophy. All of the sources for this articles are sound and I will do clean room rewrites. I'll reiterate I was unaware of the recent policy regarding us to the AI to assist with prose. - Scarpy (talk) 04:03, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
- Importantly here - this template makes it look like I added AI assisted prose after the first the discussion with JTtheOG, which is false. - Scarpy (talk) 13:53, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
- To be clear here - between May 21 and 25 of 2026 I created articles (with sourcing I still standby, but admittedly AI prose) these were Clayton Long Trophy, Cohen Media Group, Helen Jean Spiller, Frank H. Ricketson Jr., Fox Intermountain Theatres, Lakeside Leagues, Cooper Cinerama Theater, Denham Theatre and Orchestraphone. @JTtheOG tagged these with {{AI-generated}} on May 25th and left a template on my talk page. We had a discussion on Talk:Clayton Long Trophy where I told him I wasn't aware of the new policies (new to me, at least) and said I would clean-up the existing article and not further use LLMs or, specifically in my case, AI assisted prose.
- A helpful Wikipedian did the cleanup on the Denham Theatre article on June 3rd.
- @DraconicDark left the above template on June 5 and a PROD on Lakeside Leagues
- Today I completed a rewrite of the Lakeside Leagues article. Feel free to let me know if you have any remaining concerns there.
- I'll continue with the cleanup of the other seven articles as soon as I can get to them.
- All of that being said DraconicDark - the the template you left on my talk page, I wish you would strike. Between my conversation with JTtheOG on May 25 and June 5th I didn't edit Wikipedia and add AI assisted prose, but the template you left would indicate otherwise. I realize there's a lot of threads to follow here, and I'm not trying to dodge anything. But the template above implies between May 25 and June 5th going back on what I said I wouldn't do when I talked with JTtheOG. - Scarpy (talk) 07:25, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Invitation to WPID
editI've started User:Larry Sanger/WikiProject Intellectual Diversity, a group of editors working to recover fair decision-making, genuine neutrality, transparent governance, and public accountability on Wikipedia—all through established on-wiki processes (RfCs, Village Pump, noticeboards, talk pages). We now have twenty members and counting, including several deeply experienced editors. If these goals interest you, have a look at the project page and consider signing up. We could use your help. Larry Sanger (talk) 20:58, 12 June 2026 (UTC)