They're threatening to ban you for an entire bloody year at Arbcom. Absolutely f**k*** outrageous!
Show them your article creation list, Sarah, I think you probably have the record.
Sure you lose your rag from time to time - but don't we all, especially when faced with extreme provocation and wind-up merchnats....Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ) talk • 17:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago37 comments3 people in discussion
I have long (going back 20 years) known that on matters geopolitical, Wikipedia was censored and biased towards an Anglo-American/Western perspective. I assumed at the time there was an army of bored US soldiers in Iraq or wherever spending their time "improving the project". Obviously, they had the time available to move up the Wiki-ranks, become Admins etc.
Now I see it was rather more coordinated than that. Wikipedia has become (and maybe always was) an instrument of Anglo-American hegemonistic propaganda manipulated by the CIA. What do you think Sswonk? Sarah777 (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
"Fly, Like You"
Holy holy fuck Sarah777 yes of course this is where all manner of recruitment, surveillance, setting in amber of views favorable to the Trilateralists, Vatican, Bob Hope. I don't know where they are, they could be in Canada, the PM saying, clearly, politely, "Will you please move your Wikimonitor Force elsewhere?"!!! -- I concentrate on spreading hope and cheerfulness. They have a lot to answer for. They all just shake their heads. They want hope, not AIDS, eradicated. Are those the forces of bias you mean?
Now, here's something that I think illustrates the need for open discussion of authoritarianism everywhere: in Quincy, my city here just south of Boston, shake/trim cannabis goes for under $2 (< €1.74) a gram. Full flower goes for ~$3.20 /g (~€2.80 /g), or more -- all when purchasing 28g (1 oz). A soul can wake up, stroll out the door with some cash, go to the store by the bridge on the main highway to the southern towns (3A), and walk out with all types of flower, edibles, and so on. No one cares.
However, when I asked Gemini, Google, whether cannabis is legal in Ireland, the 1000 monkeys responded: "No, marijuana is not legal in Ireland for recreational use. It is also illegal to possess, cultivate, or sell it.
"However, medical cannabis is legal in certain cases, with a prescription from a registered medical practitioner and approval from the Minister for Health."
Yes, and in Texas, the simians in Mountain View say: "Class B Misdemeanor, Up to 180 days in jail, $2,000 fine." In other words, if you walk out of the door with flower, etc., there they take it away! And lock you up! And demand more money!
I like Plan A, where nobody cares. But the difference, and I think this is serious and surrounded by cheekiness, is you talk about the CIA and army, so on, and I agree. The difference is the ubiquitousness of the internet. Geez you have such a way of getting me started, I just saw this question and now I am like, Kings and Queens had no internet, hidden lethal groups now can see what time I walked out of Walmart, and what I watch.
Sarah, I hear this in my head some days, years later: be faithful to the truth as you see it. Always. I trust that if we discuss this dystopian surveillance, maybe we can help people suffer less from it. I did not stop by here for a few weeks, sorry I missed it as a fresh question, but I am glad you asked what I thought. Sswonk (talk) 22:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Your response is too oblique for easy comprehension. I am going to study it and, at length, get back to you with some observations. Sarah777 (talk) 22:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ping @Sarah777, since it's now December. Hope nothing dire is distracting you. Regarding comprehension of my cannabis/Rixy street art offerings, maybe you're overthinking? The essence is I see a battle between the artificial, constricting, unsophisticated, rules-infested (scare quotes) "internet", and the living, adaptive, artistic, forgiving, human maternal instincts of freedom, the bottom up people. I have chosen to go with the latter, probably a choice made when I was 10. I worry that we here in Massachusetts who have undone bad cannabis laws might end up being beaten back by those who define "progress" or "success" as controlling things they don't understand and having their new control labeled as "efficient" and "intelligent". I know that's not you, but that is the trend of the authoritarian US. Some of the world is frozen in 1946. The generals are in charge they think. So I really, seriously agree with you that authoritarian embeds are here on this project, and my solution is to be honest and loud about opposing them. Would like to hear from you, as much as you can muster. Sswonk (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2025 (UTC) Sswonk (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I was using a VPN, as I do, and Wiki had range-blocked whatever address the VPN had conjured up for me! If you want to get RT in free democratic Europe that's what you have to do. Hypocrisy is really the only real Western value. Sarah777 (talk) 10:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ironically, I'm back from China (that's a whole other experience!) and there I had to use a VPN to get Wiki, but RT was no problem. It seems nobody really believes in freedom to present facts, or nonsense, that they don't like.
No meaning or classification at all. Do you see the bomb and the internet as intertwined suppression points, or I am past best by date? Or any other string of characters, a free response. Sswonk (talk) 17:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Rhyme time. Older I get, though, the more Heaney's thought about history rhyming can have me thinking, "well, Mark Antony, so these modern folks are just the latests." That may be due to meaning chipping away with repetition. Fintan O'Toole is rhyming the Opium Wars with DOGE/MAGA in his latest column, good enough for me to point to as aligning with how I see social media, a colonizing effort. (sic). Sswonk (talk) 13:55, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sadly, Fintan now majors in penning articles that might be lucrative in The Guardian (I guess it pays way more than the Irish Times)!
Trump is bit a more explicit agent of settled Western policy to maintain its fading global hegemony, than the US Democrats (or the "centrist liberals" of Europe - who are neither centrist nor liberal).
I advocate dance! Dance, shake your booty, move, flow, dance! It is a health message, avoid stress and love the music and how it makes you feel. Happy New Year to you, my great friend. Sswonk (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Well I was Ok with Israel not going to Eurovision, but it looks like the US shouldn't go to any contests with other countries either. There is more than "one bad apple", Trump is the tip of a centuries long spear of racism and won by 2 million votes 14 months ago. Not a Palestinian, but I think common sense tells us all that Israeli racism against the rest of the world has its champion in him. What continues to upset me is I feel that so many claims of upset against his actions stupidly forget about the 77 million who were credulous enough to cast a ballot for him. Too many follow the rules of corporate "neutrality" when dealing with political situations. The real leader, and culprit, is the board at the bank, serenely above it all. Trump's the Bully XL, but the one with the leash, the arrogance of centuries of racist murder, they gonna gives "cover" to the 77 million sad humans who put this sick man in office. Sorry you and anyone reading this has to deal with our country, corporations, media – truly I am sorry. Sswonk (talk) 14:53, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I suppose from my perspective the only difference between Trump and the Democrats is that Trump removes the mask. The Genocide peaked under Biden. So, 150 million Americans voted for murder in pursuit of hegemony. Only the Maga half seem prepared to admit what they are doing! Sarah777 (talk) 06:11, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Squeezing the margins, I feel what you wrote in the sense of "Sympathy for the Devil", and will let Keith Richards say it from our article:
Of the change in public perception the band experienced after the song's release, Richards said in a 1971 interview with Rolling Stone, "Before, we were just innocent kids out for a good time, they're saying, 'They're evil, they're evil.' Oh, I'm evil, really? So that makes you start thinking about evil ... What is evil? Half of it, I don't know how many people think of Mick as the devil or as just a good rock performer or what? There are black magicians who think we are acting as unknown agents of Lucifer and others who think we are Lucifer. Everybody's Lucifer."
Who calls for revolution under this massive surveillance though? Is that wisdom? It's troubling, like that song has always carried unease, to think about real anarchy and collective culpability. I could have written in my vote, AOC instead of Harris. Yes. Sswonk (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
And on peaking, the genocide, I think it is very on the upswing. Technology is not neutral. Big advances in technology increase "objective" decision making, so ask what are the downsides of getting the steam engine, locomotive, telegraph, telephone, automobile, radio, television. Not much time is spent mentioning wiping out native peoples, who apparently live in the old pre-"modern miracles" period. The mask, as a deception or lie, appears adept, uh, well, Snowball seems very skillful anyway:
“A bird’s wing, comrades,” he said, “is an organ of propulsion and not of manipulation. It should therefore be regarded as a leg. The distinguishing mark of man is the hand, the instrument with which he does all his mischief.”
The birds did not understand Snowball’s long words, but they accepted his explanation, and all the humbler animals set to work to learn the new maxim by heart. FOUR LEGS GOOD, TWO LEGS BAD, was inscribed on the end wall of the barn, above the Seven Commandments and in bigger letters. When they had once got it by heart, the sheep developed a great liking for this maxim, and often as they lay in the field they would all start bleating “Four legs good, two legs bad! Four legs good, two legs bad!” and keep it up for hours on end, never growing tired of it.
I was residing near the Stonewall Inn and its little triangular park, and no sooner had I left than Trump tries to remove the flags. Greenwich is a seriously nice place. Pity I couldn't afford it!
Downside is that Wiki "range-blocked" my IP in America.
Ah Sarah, I am imagining you as so utterly miserable at this point that I have called an outdent. Thank you for carving this space out for me. So I was in the midst of reading your essay in my user space that I have preserved for all to enjoy, and I hovered over your username link to see via pop-ups your talk page history, and saw you have alit. Do you realize how much I admire you? Your clear logic? Your icepick humor? That essay could exist alongside the Mandelbrot set as the description therein of "The Symptoms", repeated, covers the publication bias dilemma in all ways, an illustrated infinity of excuse. Who is a "reliable source" among people knowledgable of the workings of a cocaine cartel, for example? A diary of cocina española recipes, found pero es autopublicado – RS enough? The essay that ate academia!
I'm gonna get sick here, but re: the evil empire and living here and having this be our news, yuck all day. GIGO, if not GUBU. It really was the mid-nineties, and they really did make a military vehicle suspiciously named à la slang for felatio. But I haven't given up, in spite or spit of thirty-four years of this. And in the midst of that, I will ask you to please send a messenger to me the next time you get here in this the manifested zone, I would love to buy a lunch or dinner for you. Frreeee. Sswonk (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
btw - I had completely forgotten that thing I wrote 20 years ago. Wouldn't change a word after all that time! How did you even find it? Sarah777 (talk) 03:08, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Honestly I can't remember where I saw it, at the time I was hoping to avoid becoming a bit of a Sarah777 mouthpiece, in the "Figuratively and with negative connotations ..." sense on that disambiguation page. I went at it with admins, you had them scorning you severely, 2010 times or around then. I'm almost certain it (your original essay) had been linked in the admin activity zones. I preserved it, seriously not wanting to simply echo you but to sort of "meta" it. Wax seal? I wouldn't change the agreement I expressed, and I second you, the essay is quite salient. Sswonk (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Today we have a whole new paradigm. AI. It can write anything you want given the right instructions. It makes me wonder - how much of Wiki is now written by AI? Has any sentient looked into this? Now, to be clear, I'm not saying AI generated spin is anything but an enhancment of the "mainsteam" crap that the media and Wiki policy served up. It just really makes it so easy. But in every direction. A net plus? Sarah777 (talk) 03:16, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
While reading today, I found Bejaysus F.C.; try taking a "neutral point of view" look at Wild Animal Ethics and the questions raised, some older than AI dilemmas but certainly close in implication. In other words, AI lords it feels like to me can easily view the rest of us in a similar way, we are the "wild animals". Very profound, difficult problems which multiply - I see a viral collapse of ethics. I wish I could find it, author Lisa McInerney talked in an interview over a decade ago about us -- humans -- saying we were sort of a nasty viral rash on earth, unable to stop our worst trends. Sswonk (talk) 21:48, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Bastun, you are not alone. On YouTube just about everyone interesting has AI versions. It is getting more difficult to tell them from the real thing. Still can do - but in twelve months? Anyway Sswonk, soon us humans may not be any sort of rash on earth! Sarah777 (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Any Admins out there? I have recieved a message that my edit of the Quentin Letts article was reversed. I never heard of Mr Letts so I looked at what I had apparently edited only to discover that it was a bit of vandalism by the the account which, above, "exposed" the alleged fake identity of User:Gaimhreadhan. How can wiki think this edit is mine? Something is afoot. Sarah777 (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
FA
A
GA
