Samsonopaluwa
Formatting of section headings
editThe formatting of section headings that you did at climate risk and climate change mitigation was not an improvement, and has been undone. Please study WP:MOS before making further changes to the formatting of section headings. EMsmile (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Rosiestep (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
edit
Hello, I'm Pbritti. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A number of your edits seem to be tests regarding linking. Please see WP:OVERLINK for how this can be detrimental for the project. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Recent edit reversion
editIn this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Dr ibrahim wada moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Dr ibrahim wada. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it consists of machine-generated text and needs more inline citations for verification. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Erakilos (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr ibrahim wada (April 6)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
- promotional language: see Words to watch;
- personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
- informal language.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Dr ibrahim wada to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
 |
Hello, Samsonopaluwa!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 14:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr ibrahim wada
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr ibrahim wada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 14:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Bolding
editGreetings. In the Easter Monday article, you decided that the term "Good Friday" should be in bold, despite it not being the subject of the article. Is there a reason you did that? GeographicAccountant (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- I made it bold so it would not look like a sentence but a term. Samsonopaluwa (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Samsonopaluwa, sorry to say, but "Easter Monday" is what the article is talking about and as such, other terms such as "Good Friday" should not be made to stand out. Even the term "Easter Monday" has times when it should be bolded and when it should not be (not every mention of it should be bolded). That is why you have seen a certain editor undo some of the changes you made there. GeographicAccountant (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Idris Wada, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 17:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- it was a reliable source Samsonopaluwa (talk) 17:52, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I agree to GeographicAccountant: the topic of the article should only be bolded in the lede, not every time it appears. Sometimes you even bolded words or parts of sentences that are neither the topic nor a redirect to it. *Please* let it be, it causes lot of work to restore the previous version. An additional plea: would you please give a meaningful edit comment instead of "improve article", so that other editors can image what you changed? Thank you.