SAGuy64

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, SAGuy64, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 04:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of United Voice Australia Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Voice Australia Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Voice Australia Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 10:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Re - United Voice Australia Party. The article had a redirection to an individual's article. I have updated to remove the redirection and added an infobox template based on other registered political parties. United Voice Australia Party appear in the articles '2026 South Australian state election" and "2026 South Australian House of Assembly election".

Please note a similar article has been created for another new political party in South Australia - "Fair Go for Australians". That redirection was remove on 1 March 2026 also from an individual's article.

United Voice Australia Party is a registered political party, since 2025, in South Australia and is fielding candidates at an Election to be held on the 21 March 2026. The party has even lodged official "How to Vote Cards" with the South Australian Electoral Commission. They will appear on the ballot Paper in Group G. Refer to https://www.ecsa.sa.gov.au/?view=article&id=1157:legislative-council-candidates-2026&catid=12

I hope this information assists. Note - I am not a member of this Political Party or any Political Party. SAGuy64 (talk) 11:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for responding, but none of this establishes notability in any way. A party being registered or fielding candidates is not relevant. Fair Go for Australians has an elected politician (Sarah Game, who left PHON), as well as sources that demonstrate notability. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 11:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electoral district of Morialta, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vista and Newton were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1871 South Australian football season has been accepted

1871 South Australian football season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 08:04, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SAGuy64. Thank you for your work on 1871 South Australian football season. Another editor, SnowyRiver28, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for starting this, and welcome to Wikipedia :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SnowyRiver28}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 06:37, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Australian National Football League, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodville was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bankers Football Club

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bankers Football Club, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SAGuy64! Your additions to 1871 South Australian football season have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:15, 21 May 2026 (UTC)