Rohit1976

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dipak Giri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Rohit1976! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dipak Giri

Hello, Rohit1976. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dipak Giri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dipak Giri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 21:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

1) remove all the listings, indexing sources used as references.

2) add references to reviews of works by Deepak giri. And not to the references to work by Deepak giri.

3) if you failed to establish a notability of Deepak giri we will be forced to delete this draft too. We need definitive proof of the fact Deepak giri is notable enough. Thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dipak Giri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist🌈 12:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Any sources authored by Shiv Sethi should be removed immediately, as they appear to hijack our notability guidelines. The submission may be rejected if these sources are not removed prior to resubmission. Please review WP:UPE and WP:COI for future reference. Please assume good faith.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dipak Giri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

I have removed sources authored by Shiv Sethi. Thank you for your valuable suggestion. Regards Rohit1976 (talk) 14:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rohit1976. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Dipak Giri, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for giving me guidelines but this article is free from any such violation stated by you. I only wish to know how you found out that I may have conflict of interest. Before tagging COI, you must have detected something wrong which made you sure that the article is not impartial. I pray you to clarify me. Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

You took a picture of Mr. Giri where he posed for you, so you obtained access to him. What is your connection to Mr. Giri? 331dot (talk) 09:10, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

I have deleted the photo from my article. Now kindly tell me what to be done by me for re-submission as there is no option for re-submission. Rohit1976 (talk) 12:21, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechnician27 was:

This article is functionally unchanged with respect to the concerns expressed by TheBirdsShedTears. It's abundantly clear that both major editors of this article have an intractable problem with managing their own enormous conflict of interest, that this article's subject likely does not warrant creation under WP:NBIO, and that the editors will continue to brute-force this AfC anyway for the sake of SEO, self-promotion, and autobiography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dipak Giri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 02:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

I request you to be kind enough to understand that this article is not written for the sake of SEO, self-promotion, and autobiography. This article is written only with an aim of making the world more familiar with Dipak Giri's immense contribution to mankind and society through his works where he has tried his best to articulate the voices of marginalized. I hope you'll understand the underlying noble spirit of this article and withdraw your claim. Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 09:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

... making the world more familiar with is promotion. We are an encyclopedia, we do not work to promote anyone or anything. We seek only to document what others have written about the subject. I support TheTechnician27's assessment. Further actions along these lines by you will likely bring about the removal of your editing priviledges. I'll post a warning below to that effect. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I have used this phrase unintentionally. I seek apology for that. Next time I'll keep in mind. Thanks for clarifying my mistake. Rohit1976 (talk) 13:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. UtherSRG (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for this warning and also for clarifying my mistake. I'll keep in mind. Regards. Rohit1976 (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (July 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:33, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Last time I was told to use sources which are reliable and as per the policy of Wikipedia. I have tried my best to incorporate only those references which are reliable and fall within notability guidelines as per previous advice and suggestion. You have rejected the article with the remark that the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia but have not clarified how this topic is insufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. There are many references which so far I think the topic is sufficiently notable. The person has had immense contribution as a writer and critic and even available on Google knowledge panel. There are so many reviews written on him by eminent writers, academics and scholars. Still it's surprising for me that the person does not fall under notability guidelines. It's more frustrating that you have taken the right of further editing over this article. May I humbly ask on which ground you are claiming that this topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 08:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

I also request you if I'm doing any mistake you should guide me. I have become confused over writing this article. There are many references over the internet. Every time I'm trying to make it better but it it is rejected. I have tried to choose best ones this time but the topic is again rejected and even I have been stopped from further editing. This is my first article. It'll be helpful if you help me step by step with your expertise.

Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 09:06, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

I have deleted the photo from my article. Now kindly tell me what to be done by me for re-submission as there is no option for re-submission. Rohit1976 (talk) 12:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Another editor has resubmitted it. 331dot (talk) 13:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Giri (July 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has already been rejected.

qcne (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

I think if you're just mentioning "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia" is not enough to prove that the topic is not sufficiently notable. You should clarify in plain and simple words how this topic is not sufficiently notable for the inclusion in Wikipedia.

If one googles Dipak Giri, one also finds him he has many followers on popular social medias and other platforms. This proves that the topic is notable.

As regards good sources last time I was told to incorporate only three good sources to prove that the subject is notable. Keeping this in my mind, this time I have incorporated many good sources. I have incorporates sources from popular newspaper and journals. These sources are even available on Wikipedia. These source are also unprofitable and have no relation with the subject. For example, Muse India, Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, Wilderness House Literary Review, The Hans India etc. are reliable sources and unquestionable and they are even available on Wikipedia.

Still if you think I need any more improvement it's my humble and earnest request to locate the exact problem where it is. I'll surely try to solve the problem. However, it's not humanly if you stop my right of editing over my article.

I hope you'll take me request in positive way and allow me to work on my article.

Thanks and regards Rohit1976 (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Rohit1976.

When an article is rejected, you need to reach out to the rejecting reviewer, in this case @Thilsebatti directly. But you should only reach out if: 1) you believe there has been egregious error in the rejection process or 2) the draft has substantially changed since the rejection. The draft has not changed since the rejection.

You replied to @Thilsebatti's rejection above only today - let them respond and if they don't respond within about a week let me know and I will take another look. qcne (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

I have reached out to @Thilsebatti and waiting for reply. Thanks for advice. Regards Rohit1976 (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 02:16, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Dipak Giri

added links pointing to Munda, Bama, Bodo, Galo, Khasi and Kodava

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for bringing necessary changes and refinement. Now I have checked and found that There are no such issues as you have already corrected all disambiguation pages . Rohit1976 (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Rohit1976. Thank you for your work on Creative Flight. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources to show that there is WP:SIGCOV and establish notability as per WP:NJOURNAL. Please also reduce the reliance on the journal's own website. Please also add sources for the "Focus and scope" section. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay, Mariamnei, I'll try my best to bring about the refinement in the article as per your suggestion. Rohit1976 (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Creative Flight

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Creative Flight, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~2026-33328-62 (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello, I'm ~2026-33328-62. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. ~2026-33328-62 (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Advert and COI warnings

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)