PositivelyUncertain

July 2025

Hello, I'm Raladic. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Gender-critical feminism. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article, even if the content is negative or offensive in nature. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Raladic (talk) 04:48, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

For anyone wondering, the dispute here is not about censoring offensive content...it's about a quote making bold claims that don't appear elsewhere in the article PositivelyUncertain (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Military–industrial complex#Connotations".The discussion is about the topic Military–industrial complex.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Uhoj (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, PositivelyUncertain!

Happy New Year!

PositivelyUncertain,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 07:15, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 07:15, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello PositivelyUncertain! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Searching Wikipedia space, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Contentious topic alert

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TarnishedPath^talk 05:48, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello PositivelyUncertain! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article style templates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Notification of proposed decision

Hi PositivelyUncertain, in the open Maghreb arbitration case, which you have commented on, a proposed decision has been posted. You can review the proposed decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:39, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, that's not me

I did lose my password, and I said as much in an ECP restoration request, but whoever this person is, it's not me. Probably Golikom, it turned out he was my wikistalker all this time. Snokalok2 (talk) 20:45, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

So you really did lose your password but set up Snokalok2 and B was your wikistalkers account? Talk about a plot twist. Damn even after all these months they are still watching you like a hawk. That's kind of unnerving. And the stalker was Golikom? I just assumed it was a random troll who latched onto you, not a former editor. Sorry you have to deal with this insanity. Hopefully you get back that special TA tool too. PositivelyUncertain (talk) 01:10, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Yeah that's pretty much the sum of it. I've gotten my ECP back so far, so that's nice. And yeah, I never would've expected Golikom either of all people, just - such a classic case of "It's always the quiet ones" Snokalok2 (talk) 01:14, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Further reading

I don't disagree with you that a book about anthropology might not be appropriate on Man (its more suited for Human), but I wouldn't ever use price as a reasoning to remove a source/further reading. Many folks have access to such texts through libraries, and $120 is on the cheap side for textbooks. In fact, its free through the Wikipedia Library. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you Captain Eek! I appreciate you pointing the price point out to me and also noting that it's free on Wikilibrary. I didn't realize it includes textbooks too. Obviously I'm a newish/green editor so the feedback is very helpful :) PositivelyUncertain (talk) 02:31, 31 May 2026 (UTC)