PeeJay
| This is PeeJay's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
Good article reassessment for Joshua King (footballer, born 1992)
editJoshua King (footballer, born 1992) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 13 § European men's football cups
edit
Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 13 § European men's football cups on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:14, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Requested topic ban
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Nicknack009 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- This is a disproportionate escalation. I expect it will be dismissed with the prejudice it deserves. – PeeJay 22:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- It genuinely feels like you haven't actually looked at the entirety of the edit I made to the Ulster article. I fixed a whole load of issues that I very much doubt you had any problem with, but because I removed the line-ups (which are probably a violation of WP:CRUFT, btw), you got precious about an article that you do not own. We all appreciate the work you put into those articles, but if someone else comes along to fix obvious issues, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater to save your personal passion project. – PeeJay 22:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- Have you read WP:CRUFT? It's not a policy, it's an essay, it's entirely about fiction, and is mostly a warning against throwing around terms like that. The few minor formatting errors (mostly curly quotes in link titles) are just being used to obscure up your real intent, which is the removal of large amounts of encyclopedic content without discussion, and making it difficult to revert. I'm not playing your game. --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Again, you’re assuming bad faith where none exists. I fixed the page in all sorts of ways that I deemed it needed to be fixed, including removing flags from referees, removing whitespace and adding endashes in scorelines where previously you had used a simple hyphen. Please stop thinking you know what another person’s intent is when you clearly don’t. – PeeJay 09:16, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Have you read WP:CRUFT? It's not a policy, it's an essay, it's entirely about fiction, and is mostly a warning against throwing around terms like that. The few minor formatting errors (mostly curly quotes in link titles) are just being used to obscure up your real intent, which is the removal of large amounts of encyclopedic content without discussion, and making it difficult to revert. I'm not playing your game. --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)