August 2025

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aesthetics have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aesthetics was changed by PatrickTheDoctor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860608 on 2025-08-24T12:29:17+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Coffee bean, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Starting a sockpuppet account to keep spamming your link is a terrible idea - nobody here was born yesterday, and this will just lead to your site being listed on Wikipedia's spam blacklist. MrOllie (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ok fair enough Ollie, won't do that again. So I am just asking for the future, how could my link be reliable and not removed when added as a reference or some source to some article that is written on wikipedia. Like I've seen many new blogs like the one that I mentioned where their article was written purely with AI and was recommended as reference on the topic "Coffee Bean". I know that my website is new but I am trying to add value to it and with time I think I will succeed in that.
Sorry again for breaking the rules. PatrickTheDoctor (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Well, you could hire editors, fact checkers, and a writing staff and become a major newspaper. Any 'new blogs' you might find used as citations on Wikipedia should not be there and will be removed as soon as a volunteer notices them. MrOllie (talk) 12:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spam

edit

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Milosh. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply