NewDawn26

April 2026

Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, William Stewart (cyclist), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:38, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NewDawn26. Thank you for your work on Tony Murphy (badminton). Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Well done.. Thank you for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:08, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NewDawn26. Thank you for your work on Mo Nasir. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:19, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1983 European Squash Team Championships, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoff Williams was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NewDawn26. Thank you for your work on Karen Leach (squash player). Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thank you for creating this page.. your work helps in filling gender gap on Wikipedia. Keep it up!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Barbara Oldfield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Oldfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Oldfield (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Thomas Hewitt (sport shooter). When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. You can also install the userscript found here to help find and eliminate these errors. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Racingmanager. Thank you. RossEvans19 (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Colmer, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Moore was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Racingmanager per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Racingmanager. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 21:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

The above message is a templated block notice. This is a personal message. You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts - I don't know why you were using multiple accounts, but that was what the original block was for. I have not reviewed your contributions in significant depth - I do not have a view on whether your contributions were positive or not, but I am happy to extend some good faith and assume, for the purposes of this discussion, that you have been trying to contribute constructively since you were blocked.

The problem is that you have not appealed the original block, you simply created a new account. That is not the way to go about continuing to contribute. In your note at the SPI, you referenced 'clean start' - I don't know whether or not you read WP:CLEANSTART, but right there in the Criteria section, under the heading Users who may not have a clean start, it says Any user who has currently active bans, blocks or other sanctions imposed. While your original account is blocked, you are not eligible for a clean start, and any new accounts you create will be blocked when they are discovered. More than that, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE, any editor who is minded to do so would be within their rights to arbitrarily revert every single edit you have made under this account, and to delete every article you have created without discussion per WP:G5. On top of all that, please see WP:3X. You have now been caught socking by a checkuser while an indefinite block is in place. If that happens again, you will be considered banned by the community, which is much harder to overturn than a regular block. So please, for all of the above reasons, do not create any more socks.

If you want to continue contributing here, you should address the original block. Ideally, you would appeal it from your original account. Explain honestly why you were using multiple accounts. Promise not to do it again. You might point out that, while you did evade your block with this account, at least you only evaded it with a single account, which I suppose does you some sort of credit. You might be asked to wait six months per the standard offer, but if you can sit that out, and if there are no skeletons in your editing closet that I am unaware of, I think it very likely that you could get the account unblocked. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 22:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Adding on

I want you to know that if you take the standard offer and ask for an unblock, I'll support you in trying to get you unblocked. I agree with Girth Summit, there's a great chance you could get unblocked. I hope there's no bad blood between us and I hope to see you back on Wikipedia :) RossEvans19 (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)