Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 8)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
Apart from the fact we can't accept AI submissions, this needs some rewriting to get within the usual NPOV layout and tone for a biography. Please see WP:YFA.

Next steps

  • Edit User:NateIsaacmanJoeMcCabe/sandbox to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, NateIsaacmanJoeMcCabe!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 12)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:
This draft duplicates another submission, Nate Isaacman, currently submitted for review. To save time, we will review the other submission only. Any future edits or improvements should be made on that submission, not here.

Next steps

  • Edit User:NateIsaacmanJoeMcCabe/sandbox to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Dan arndt (talk) 14:47, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nate Isaacman (July 12)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
It's still AI, in fact it looks like AI was used after the previous decline for AI usage.

Kindly only work on one draft at a time, two drafts led to unnecessary work by the volunteers. Kindly do not remove AFC header information. If it says "Do not remove this line", that line must not be deleted.

Regardless, I've corrected the infobox and I've given you a few more sources which will improve notability. Just get a human to write the story, based on reading the sources.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Nate Isaacman to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 15:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 13)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Qcne, left the following feedback:
This draft duplicates another submission, Nate Isaacman, currently submitted for review. To save time, we will review the other submission only. Any future edits or improvements should be made on that submission, not here.

Next steps

  • Edit User:NateIsaacmanJoeMcCabe/sandbox to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

qcne (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 14)

edit

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
You don't appear to be getting the clear message now repeated for a third time, and this may be because you are relying on AI.

a) You do not remove AFC logging information - it says "Do not remove this line", humans get that message, AI does not. b) You have two drafts, you should only use one. The other draft is here: draft:Nate Isaacman That is the draft you need to work on. It too is AI driven. It has sufficient sources for notability but you need a human being to rewrite the draft, based on the sources, not use AI to do so.

Volunteer resource is in short supply, please read the messages and work on them.

Next steps

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply