Nataliarose123
Note
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Woxic1589 (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
edit
Hello, I'm Rosguill. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:FIVB Volleyball Women's World Cup that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Separately, you appear to also be editing while logged out in order to continue engaging with the same dispute identified above. Please avoid doing this, as it is not allowed and will result in severe sanctions if continued. signed, Rosguill talk 16:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- no problem ,feel free to remove Nataliarose123 (talk) 16:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to make you that troubles. I try to keep myself calm now...
- Just want to say why people are disrepecting fact like this... Putting all unevidenced info to the wiki, really ruin my mood...
- Thanks a lot for understanding... not to bother you Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- You are the one disrespecting other editors here and you keep edit warring despite having reached no consensus nor do you behave normal at the talk page. Woxic1589 (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- No evidence no talk. I insist in this very simple and easy principle Nataliarose123 (talk) 00:44, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I saw you are making disrespect in men volleyball world cup page as well. Many people simply disagree with you, and you cannot provide anything UNTIL NOW. Nataliarose123 (talk) 01:03, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Care to share some examples of that? I have shared multiple sources already. If you don’t have any proper sources to respond with, you can ask a third editor for help. Also, learn how to discuss with respect. Such language is not accepted here. Woxic1589 (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Give me the link then, not the one which said 2023 olympic qualifier, I need the one which shows the ranking of this tournament, you still... cannot understand what I am emphasizing with, ridiculous... Nataliarose123 (talk) 13:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Stop edit warring, and stop removing content without having reached any consensus like you did here, again: . Woxic1589 (talk) 14:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- You gave no evidence with your change, why you still do not know the core problem?
- For 2025 volleyball world championship that ended yesterday, there is a official final standing stating who got no.1, 2 and so on. But there is nothing but only group stage ranking in olympic qualifier, which cannot... be treated as final ranking, they are different in neutral Nataliarose123 (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I talked to you all with simple basic logic now, without any emotion, because I know you simply cannot explain the changes you made.
- Can you explain why both Germany and USA got 7 wins 0 loss, and Ger gets 21 pts more than the 20 pts of USA, but the champion is USA? This contradicts with the logic of usual FIVB practice.
- Please check the page, explain the reason, and provide the source if USA really took the champion. Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I will keep monitoring the situtation until the fact was disclosed, or the admin can find the final solution. I will not give up Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- You never talk with evidence, official links, and facts,
- Learn from me, post all the relevant links to the admin to prove you are right. This is really a very basic principle.
- For me, I am the use who only registered the account for this sole purpose, because you really made me so angry.
- Until now, you have not explained what sources of facts are based on the changes you made Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- My attitude is very bad in the beginning, but I try my best to keep calm. But until now, I felt disappointed bacause you yourself have not solved your core problem, which is not-evidence based Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I know you will watch. Come on! Be brave, be a real human. Prove that you are right to me! Don't escape from the problem Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:18, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I don't what you think you're trying to achieve here, but clearly it is not working. At some point this needling is simply harassment. Drmies (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, but please, I talked a lot about the proof of his changes. If there is no proof/sound argument, it is not difficult reach consensus. Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- WP:DROPTHESTICK. Now, please. --Yamla (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ok I left first.
- Keep calm everyone! Stay cool and have a good night! Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- WP:DROPTHESTICK. Now, please. --Yamla (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, but please, I talked a lot about the proof of his changes. If there is no proof/sound argument, it is not difficult reach consensus. Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- My confidence come from the research I really struggled to make, how about you? Nataliarose123 (talk) 17:22, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I don't what you think you're trying to achieve here, but clearly it is not working. At some point this needling is simply harassment. Drmies (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Stop edit warring, and stop removing content without having reached any consensus like you did here, again: . Woxic1589 (talk) 14:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Give me the link then, not the one which said 2023 olympic qualifier, I need the one which shows the ranking of this tournament, you still... cannot understand what I am emphasizing with, ridiculous... Nataliarose123 (talk) 13:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Care to share some examples of that? I have shared multiple sources already. If you don’t have any proper sources to respond with, you can ask a third editor for help. Also, learn how to discuss with respect. Such language is not accepted here. Woxic1589 (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- You are the one disrespecting other editors here and you keep edit warring despite having reached no consensus nor do you behave normal at the talk page. Woxic1589 (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Nataliarose123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Getting 4th in the 2023 men's volleyball Olympic qualifier does not have any proof. This is only group stage ranking, but not the final ranking. They are different in neutral~
Decline reason:
You are blocked for edit warring, not for the contents of your edits. If you wish to be unblocked from this article, you will need to address this. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nataliarose123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Not a unblock request, just want to respnd to the admin that I agree with that.
Decline reason:
Please stop abusing the unblock template. Yamla (talk) 15:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note about edit warring
editMaking multiple reverts, like you have been temporarily blocked for, is disruptive. There are a select few exceptions, and this wasn't one of them, regardless of whether you were right or wrong about the content dispute. Please don't do that again, or you might be blocked for longer. Thanks, QuicoleJR (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminder~ I will mind my acts Nataliarose123 (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2025 (UTC)