User talk:Nableezy/Archive 59

Archive 55

←

Archive 57

Archive 58

Archive 59

advice for article creation

hi i’d love to speak to you about creating an article please. it’s on a controversial conflict so this is why i’d like to get it right. thanks Eatlandlords (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed decision of Palestine-Israel articles 5 posted

Hi Nableezy, in the open Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:01, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 closed

The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• All articles whose topic is strictly within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article.
• AndreJustAndre, BilledMammal, Iskandar323, Levivich, Makeandtoss, Nableezy, Nishidani, and Selfstudier are indefinitely topic banned from the Palestine-Israel conflict, broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Zero0000 is warned for their behavior in the Palestine-Israel topic area, which falls short of the conduct expected of an administrator.
• Should the Arbitration Committee receive a complaint at WP:ARCA about AndreJustAndre, within 12 months of the conclusion of this case, AndreJustAndre may be banned from the English Wikipedia by motion.
• WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict#Word limits (discretionary) and WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict#Word limits (1,000 words) are both modified to add as a new second sentence to each: Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
• Any AE report is limited to a max of two parties: the party being reported, and the filer. If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so.
• The community is encouraged to run a Request for Comment aimed at better addressing or preventing POV forks, after appropriate workshopping.
• The Committee recognizes that working at AE can be a thankless and demanding task, especially in the busy PIA topic area. We thus extend our appreciation to the many administrators who have volunteered their time to help out at AE.
• Editors are reminded that outside actors have a vested interest in this topic area, and might engage in behaviors such as doxxing in an attempt to influence content and editors. The digital security resources page contains information that may help.
• Within this topic area, the balanced editing restriction is added as one of the sanctions that may be imposed by an individual administrator or rough consensus of admins at AE.

Details of the balanced editing restriction

• In a given 30-day period, a user under this restriction is limited to making no more than one-third of their edits in the Article, Talk, Draft, and Draft talk namespaces to pages that are subject to the extended-confirmed restriction under Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic procedures.
  • This will be determined by an edit filter that tracks edits to pages in these namespaces that are extended confirmed protected, or are talk pages of such pages, and are tagged with templates to be designated by the arbitration clerks. Admins are encouraged to apply these templates when protecting a page, and the clerks may use scripts or bots to add these templates to pages where the protection has been correctly logged, and may make any necessary changes in the technical implementation of this remedy in the future.
  • Making an edit in excess of this restriction, as determined at the time the edit is made, should be treated as if it were a topic ban violation. Admins should note that a restricted user effectively cannot violate the terms of this and above clauses until at least 30 days after the sanction has been imposed.
• They are topic banned from the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, in all namespaces other than these four (except for their own userspace and user talkspace).
• This sanction is not subject to the normal standards of evidence for disruptive editing; it simply requires a finding that it would be a net positive for the project were the user to lower their activity in the topic area, particularly where an editor has repeatedly engaged in conflict but is not being intentionally or egregiously disruptive.
• Any admin finding a user in violation of this restriction may, at their discretion, impose other contentious topic sanctions.

• If a sockpuppet investigations clerk or member of the CheckUser team feels that third-party input is not helpful at an investigation, they are encouraged to use their existing authority to ask users to stop posting to that investigation or to SPI as a whole. In addition to clerks and members of the CheckUser team, patrolling administrators may remove or collapse contributions that impede the efficient resolution of investigations without warning.

For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 closed

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I don't actively edit topics related to A-I, but I follow it enough to understand that you've heavily contributed to the improvement of articles within it. It's a shame that things are playing out how they are, but here's to hoping you might be able to get back to doing so at some point. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 16:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much, thats very kind. But idk, guess we'll see how much more of my time I want to spend here. nableezy - 20:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

+1, I really appreciate your work on this conflict and think that your partial block was unfair. I hope to see you back at editing. Also اجدع ناس 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

thanks

Hi Nableezy, thanks for your support when I was first getting started on WP. And thanks for all your contributions. DMH223344 (talk) 01:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

You are very welcome, I hope you stick around. nableezy - 20:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

• Yeah, it's about time I added my thanks for all the work you've done on Wikipedia, especially on sockpuppets. Obviously I find the Arbcom decision above to ban some of Wikipedia's best editors totally bizarre. --NSH001 (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

  It’s only bizarre if you think the point of this place was to make an encyclopedia. Hope you’re well Neil, nableezy - 15:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

  Healthwise I'm fine thanks. Sitting here with tears streaming down my face on learning about Marianne Faithfull, spotted a piece about her on an obscure French-language newpaper site while researching sources for an article I'm trying to re-write. Brings back memories of my teenage years, the happiest period of my life, 1960s music (nothing since is its equal), Beatles, etc. Nostalgia! 1950s were the years before TV, there were five cinemas we used to go to, spread around 3 towns, tried to remember their names but only got 2 of them right. I knew one of them (my parents called it the "flea-pit", but I couldn't see anything wrong with it) began with the letter "C", but couldn't remember its name. Was quite pleased I managed to track it down, see the Countess Cinema. All 5 of those cinemas have since closed, but some new ones have appeared. I think now it's only going to be a matter of time before they arrest me and throw me in prison for protesting against the genocide. The big demo on 18 Jan (I've only missed two so far, medical problems) really got my blood boiling (google it for all the horrors) and made me even more determined. --NSH001 (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

It's been a while.

I can see nothing interesting has happened here. Hope you're well. - asad (talk) 02:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox road/name/PSE

Template:Infobox road/name/PSE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox road/shieldmain/PSE

Template:Infobox road/shieldmain/PSE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox road/shield/PSE

Template:Infobox road/shield/PSE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Palestine highway templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Palestine highway templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Palestine transport templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Palestine transport templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

October 3, 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Notifying you due to your previous discussions in the related talk pages. See here 81567518W (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

wanted

(Re: this ... please don't view arbcom decisions as general takes on wantedness. I hope to see you return as the informed, dedicated, and fair contributor (not one I always agree with, but that's kinda the point I'm trying to make) with which I've been accustomed, and whose presence and input is wanted by this editor. ---Sluzzelin talk 03:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Probably not tbh, feel about this place how Rick James felt about Eddie Murphy's couch. nableezy - 20:00, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

i always miss you Tiamut (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

I feel about you the way Rick James felt about cocaine. nableezy - 20:44, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

How did I miss this? Listen to Iskander and come back if you can. (Not knowing who Rick James is, I have to believe him. Tiamut (talk) 21:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

And after being jailed, Rick James got back to making music – so looking forward to your career rebound! Every good sabbatical has to end. Iskandar323 (talk) 21:19, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Io, Saturnalia!

		Io, Saturnalia!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#ARBPIA5_topic_bans

Please see the above section. The Arbitration Committee is reviewing allegations of topic ban violations in relation to ARBPIA5, and this notification is being sent as you are one of the individuals subject to a topic ban in the case. There is a section for you to reply if you wish. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 21:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hard pass. nableezy - 16:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

• Run and hit edits like this are WP:POINTY and useless WP:TROLLing. consider self-reverting?

User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 16:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

It's "hit and run". nableezy - 16:07, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you and best of luck 🍀

Dear nableezy, I see that you are retired. I wanted to thank you for teaching me how to better edit Wikipedia (that I need to actually carefully read the sources and sometimes what I edit is not what the sources say). I also wanted to thank you for your advice to try not to revert people when there’s a 1RR rule, and thank you for not bringing me into Arbitration enforcement those years ago. Although we probably don’t agree much on anything in terms of views on Wikipedia, and sometimes you probably have been very frustrated in general, I did enjoy editing alongside you these past years.

I always did think you and some other editors did spend awfully long hours on Wikipedia… there’s lots to do and see and experience and explore in the real world!! So best wishes to you and thank you for being on here. Wafflefrites (talk) 05:53, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Looking at your user page

And missing you a lot. And noticing that more than half of the filings made against you were by sockpuppets (but you have not indicated for every one of them). Its appalling really. All my love brother. Tiamut (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

One more thing. I had to change email long ago after getting spammed eith rape/death threats which collapsed my then account. And I did not enable my new email to be public as a result. I can't see your email here. If you ever want to reach me, Huldra knows my current one. Please ask her and keep in touch please. Tiamut (talk) 06:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Rooh Afza

		A glass of Rooh Afza for you
		Here is a glass of Rooh Afza! Rooh Afza is a non-alcoholic concentrated squash made with fruits, herbs and vegetable extracts. It was formulated by Hakeem Hafiz Abdul Majeed in 1906 in Ghaziabad, British India If I was in your position I would retire as well. Though, there are various things related to Palestine that aren't directly related to the conflict that you could contribute to, WP:PPAL doesn't have enough featured/good content anyway. Regardless, I hope you do try to appeal your topic ban every 12 months, if you are allowed. Whether or not you do, I think there are various people here who continue the work that you engaged in. Thank you. User:Easternsahara 02:34, 26 January 2026 (UTC) For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.