Moscriptcallum

April 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:05, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

why was a blocked indefinitely? that is severe Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I attempted to save my edit, but my Wi-Fi connection failed during the process. As a result, the page did not save correctly. I would like to retry the edit with a stable connection. Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) if you look at the history of Frank Tanti, I think you'll see what the issue is. blocks are preventative not punitive. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 02:16, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

then why not block me for a week or a month? why a permanently block? Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:21, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite only means there's no fixed term. You can be unblocked at any time, and I'm going to unblock you in a couple of minutes, but I want to talk with you first about how to avoid making a huge mess again. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:23, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

i believe indefinitely means forever. why are you unblocking me? Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

There were a huge number of edits to the page. To avoid that in the future:

1. before you save your edit, copy your changes to a notepad on your computer so you can recover it if things go wrong.

2. preview your changes.

3. save once. regardless of what error messages you get.

4. reload the page and look at it.

5. if it isn't what you expected, check the edit history. If it shows some new edits by you, I'd quit trying for now until you get a better connection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Moscriptcallum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

my wifi is failing and i can't get the page to save

Accept reason:

Plausible reason for the mess. Given advice to avoid repeat. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

i will follow your instructions and will not cause "disruptive edits" in the future Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:31, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

thank you for your help and time Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I attempted to save my edit, but my Wi-Fi connection failed during the process. As a result, the page did not save correctly. I would like to retry the edit with a stable connection. Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

refactoring others talk page comments

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. while it's fine to remove discussions in their entirety from your talk page, it's considered bad practice to change other editors comments. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 02:20, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

@Moscriptcallum, just to be clear, are you just making edits a small bit at a time because of your connection issues? otherwise, it looks at first glance like you're editing other's comments vs removing. would help if you use an edit summary for sure. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 02:55, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

can i save a edit summary? or does all my write up disappear if it doesn't publish? Moscriptcallum (talk) 02:56, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

i mean, if it doesn't save, there will be no edit to summarize. it's literally just a way to communicate to editors at a glance, what you changed, your intentions, etc. it's especially important when you're making incremental edits like you have been doing on your talk page. I see now that you were cleaning up the page, which is perfectly fine to do, but initially, it looked like you might have been changing other editors comments, which is generally frowned upon. does that make sense? -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 16:37, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Conway van Gelder Grant

The article Conway van Gelder Grant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NORG and WP:SIGCOV. I can't find any reliable source which provides SIG COV about it.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

✓ortexPhantom (talk) 10:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Conway van Gelder Grant

Hello, Moscriptcallum,

Thank you for creating Conway van Gelder Grant.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I find some signs of AI writing. WP:AISIGNS

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VortexPhantom}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✓ortexPhantom (talk) 10:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)