Mohammad Handura

Request for wider editor involvement

@Rvsingh12, लॉस एंजिल्स लेखक, GangesCommander, Northern Moonlight, Gab4gab, Pasados, TSTSR241224, AX29, Karan.jr.Singh, and KhubsuratInsaan: — Requesting your attention to 2025 India–Pakistan conflict (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflict).

There has been limited editor involvement on the page, which has led to repeated disagreements and an edit war. Your review and input would help bring more balance and consensus to the discussion. Mohammad Handura (talk) 07:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@Mohammad Handura I haven't edited this page. Why do you mention me? AX29 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@Guerillero, MSGJ, Worm That Turned, Ponyo, and The Earwig: — Requesting your attention and input here. Mohammad Handura (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@TonySt, Materialscientist, Ravensfire, 1AmNobody24, Krushitelugu, Ira Leviton, WikiScribeSavant, Solarflare0007, Radha96gopal, Cewbot, LR0725, Raushank488, Sammi Brie, Logicwiki, and Ramjat95: Mohammad Handura (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@Mohammad Handura: Although I suppose I should be honored, I also wonder why you asked for my input. I have not edited this page and have no particular insight about the topic or wish to get involved in a controversy. Ira Leviton (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, controversy is a state of mind . Although if you have had interest i request your opinion. Mohammad Handura (talk) 15:49, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Use the template for the purpose to request dispute resolution. Trying to open a case without specifying who the editors are confuses the bot. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

which template Mohammad Handura (talk) 15:40, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mohammad_Handura reported by User:Tenshi Hinanawi (Result: ). Thank you. Tenshi! (Talk page) 15:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammad Handura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Mohammad Handura (talk) 04:22, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You need to put a reason for your unblock to be considered in the "your reason here" section of the appeal. CoconutOctopus talk 05:44, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammad Handura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

reason below Mohammad Handura (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

For future reference, please review WP:GAB to understand how to write an appropriate unblock request. Your justification belongs inside the unblock template, not below. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand that I was blocked for making edits that were considered disruptive. I sincerely apologize for any disruption I caused — that was never my intention. I now realize that some of my edits did not follow Wikipedia’s content and conduct guidelines.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammad Handura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for making edits that were considered disruptive. I sincerely apologize for any disruption I caused — that was never my intention. I now realize that some of my edits did not follow Wikipedia’s content and conduct guidelines. I ask for another chance to contribute constructively, as I value the project and want to improve content in a collaborative way.Mohammad Handura (talk) 04:34, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request doesn't explain what it was about your edits that was disruptive, so it doesn't doesn't give me confidence that you won't just do the same thing again. If you wish to make another unblock request, you may want to use Wikipedia:Unblock wizard. asilvering (talk) 02:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I ask for another chance to contribute constructively, as I value the project and want to improve content in a collaborative way.

As you acknowledge you were disruptive but state you had no intention to be disruptive, I'm not convinced you'd stop being disruptive if unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:25, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Can you tell us, in your own words, what in your editing was disruptive, and what you intend to do differently if unblocked. Simply saying you won't do it again doesn't tell me whether you actually understand the issues or not. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2025 (UTC)