MiniMimas2

February 2026

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to List of video games released in 2025. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Yiosie 2356 01:34, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Dear Yiosie 2356 So I have noticed you removed papa Japa 2 off the page... and I would like to ask on what this page is called? is it not List of video games released in 2025? because if I recall Papa Japa 2 is a video game released in 2025! so this is where I'm baffled because you complain about "Promotional material" when I was simply improving and Fixing your page, so you see I think you should get a job instead of being such a cuck and deleting Accurate material from pages you bum... or if you are SO unemployed you could get rid of inaccurate information. I would also like to say that if Nintendo had added their game would you complain? and why would you assume that I had only put it there for promotional material??? its pretty weird cause If I had added a game like Mario I bet you wouldn't have batted a eye. So in conclusion Papa Japa 2 deserves and belongs in this page and if you don't think so, then you are a low IQ jobless bum. Your sincerely Me. MiniMimas2 (talk) 12:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm sorry I shouldn't have reacted like that, However I do find it is quit unnecessary to get rid of it as it is accurate information so could you please just leave it be. Thank you MiniMimas2 (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Yo wanna be friends? MiniMimas2 (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papa Japa (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by NeoGaze were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Papa Japa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, MiniMimas2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NeoGaze (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papa Japa (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs robust and reliable independent sourcing to demonstrate notability. In addition all material facts need sourcing. At the moment no sources are rock solid reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Papa Japa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 09:53, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:~2026-10855-66

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as User:~2026-10855-66, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mesocyclonic93^(t)_(c) 19:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:~2026-10855-66. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mesocyclonic93^(t)_(c) 19:41, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

He lowkey deserved it though MiniMimas2 (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:~2026-10855-66. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Mesocyclonic93^(t)_(c) 19:45, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Its fine you didnt know any better MiniMimas2 (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:54, 4 March 2026 (UTC)