Miki Filigranski

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Šokci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Šokci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Požega.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Biovičino Selo

added a link pointing to Serdar

Nikodim Milaš

added a link pointing to Church History

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crown of Zvonimir

added a link pointing to HRT

Holy Crown of Hungary

added a link pointing to HRT

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crown of Zvonimir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HRT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cherven Cities, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages West Slavic and East Slavic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luka Modrić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HRT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for protecting the article Saqaliba from vandalizm. The vandal has returned. They are basically erazing the article and removing several pages of well references information. The editor appear to have an agenda to censure the article in order to present their preferred viewpoint. I do not have the time tu truly engage in the issue, but it is important that the article be protected. I have warned the user, but perhaps the article should be protected from further vandalizm and the user be blocked for vandalizm. They show clear bias. Aciram (talk) 02:00, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Asked for protection.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 20:23, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I feel I must add a warning. I see that User: M. Bitton now participate in the discussion on the talk page. This user has a history of questioning all content which adresses the issue of slavery within Islamic context (talk page of slavery in al-Andalus), and has on one occasion defended sexual slavery within an Islamic context as something beneficial to the victim. This make me concerned for the NPOW of the article.

I wish I could participate in the discussion, but I do not participate in debates which includes this user. I suffer from anxiety: one one occasion, this user continued to post repeatedly on my personal talk page after a conflict, despite being informed that I wished to end the discussion since it caused a panic attack. Because of this, I do not trust the good will of M. Bitton. I am saying this to explain why I can not participate in the debate further than my single post to the other user prior. But the fact that the article has attracted the attention of this user does make me concerned. --Aciram (talk) 23:46, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Thompson merger

Hello. I went ahead and closed the merge discussion and performed the merge myself to help out, hope that's alright. I did my best following merge instructions to keep relevant info while leaving out a little bit that was unsourced. Feel free to make improvements and adjustments as necessary, thank you. --2605:8D80:6C29:568E:602F:E49C:B22A:4D58 (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petar Kružić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loreto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Glagolitic

User:Иованъ#Glagolitic userpages. More coming soon. Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 17:26, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, great! --Miki Filigranski (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petar Berislavić, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dubica and Ladislaus II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:50, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Chris Rea

On 23 December 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chris Rea, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 20:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Marko Perković

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Marko Perković, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Long overdue thanks

Was going through Chris Rea's article to remind myself of edits I had done a long time ago. Wanted to say thanks for all the recent work you've done. I appreciate your work on the article.THX1136 (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Southern Slavs Study

G’day Miki. I noticed you originally added the 2018 Slovenian study here to the Southern Slavs article stating:

“In the 2018 analysis of Slovenian population, the Slovenian population clustered with Croatians, Hungarians and was close to Czech.”.

Another user recently changed it to

“In a 2018 genetic study, Slovenians were grouped within a Central-Eastern European cluster together with Hungarians, Czechs, and some individuals from Croatia, consistent with a broader European genetic continuum.”

However looking at the study, the new version seems to look at only a single aspect compared to the PCA and other measurements seeming less generally descriptive than the last. Is this more accurate? I may be misunderstanding the study findings. Cheers! OyMosby (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

@OyMosby: in the study can be found, quote, The first two PCs explained ∼16% of the variance with Slovenian samples grouping together with the Croatians, Hungarians and close to the Czechs ... All Slovenian samples group together with Hungarians, Czechs, and some Croatians (“Central-Eastern European” cluster) as also suggested by the PCA ... Analysis of the UPGMA tree based on the Fst matrix shows all Slovenian individuals clustering together with Hungarians, Czechs, Croatians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians ... Pattern of runs of homozygosity computed on the Slovenian population does not differ significantly from Hungarians, Czechs, Croatians ... Slovenian samples show an admixture pattern similar to the neighboring populations such as Croatians and Hungarians, so indeed there are different methods used here, but the South Slavs paragraph is dealing with admixture, and when looking at related texts (All Slovenian samples group together with Hungarians, Czechs, and some Croatians (“Central-Eastern European” cluster) as also suggested by the PCA ... Slovenian samples show an admixture pattern similar to the neighboring populations such as Croatians and Hungarians) and Figure 3. itself (visually are evidently more similar to Croatians and Hungarians than Czechs), can be claimed both, but best would be that the "the Slovenian population showed an adxmiture pattern similar to the Croats, Hungarians and Czechs". --Miki Filigranski (talk) 23:39, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Gotcha, I’ll revert them then as their version ignored all the other methods placing them more similarly. Thanks! OyMosby (talk) 01:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)