User talk:Meno25/Archive 20

Latest comment: 12 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 22 January 2014
Archive 15Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 25

08:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Johannes Kepler

Pre-emptive blocking of articles is not allowed. 86.31.13.150 (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

  • WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos
    We saved one last special report for 2013. After our well-received review of great WikiProject logos a couple years ago, it was only a matter of time before we collected a new batch of interesting iconography that showcases the creativity of the Wikipedia community. Hopefully, these logos will also inspire other projects to liven up their drab pages.
  • News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions
    A significant move by the Wikimedia Foundation has been to broaden the types of activities it funds to develop several different programs for judging and allocating that funding, and to set up volunteer committees that initially assess applications for funding.
  • Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools
    Last month, the OAuth extension was deployed to all Wikimedia wikis. OAuth is a standard used for allowing users to authenticate third-party applications, also known as consumers, to take actions on their behalf.

08:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I fixed a bug you never reported :)

rev 9829 introduces Arabic comma when both replaced and removed are used. I need you to test it for me. you need some kind of replacement ("a" → "b") and some kind of removal ("c"→ "") in the F&R. Please test it for both Arabic and English cases. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: Unfortunately, there seems to be a problem. Using rev 9832 to change "فيلم" to "فلم" and remove "في" gives the following erroneous edit summary: As you can see the removal of "في" is not recorded in the summary and there are two English commas. --Meno25 (talk) 06:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
What about rev 9833? -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
@Magioladitis: The English commas are still there but the removal of "في" was recorded in the summary. --Meno25 (talk) 07:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
What about rev 9834? -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
@Magioladitis: One of the two English commas was localized. The other is still in English. --Meno25 (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
What about rev 9835? -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
@Magioladitis: Nope. The comma is still there. --Meno25 (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Is it complete wrong or it should be Arabic comma there? -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
What about rev 9836? At least I see now comma -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
@Magioladitis: Summary is correct when you use only "Find and replace" feature. However, I am using a combination of both "Find and replace" and "Regex typo fixing" features. Find and replace changes "فيلم" to "فلم" and removes "في" while Regex typo fixing changes "أستمرار" to "استمرار" and "إبنه" to "ابنه". The summary is currently "clean up، استبدل: فيلم ← فلم (12)، أزال: في (15), الأخطاء المصححة: أستمرار ← استمرار، إبنه ← ابنه باستخدام أوب (9836)" whereas it should be "clean up، استبدل: فيلم ← فلم (12)، أزال: في (15)، الأخطاء المصححة: أستمرار ← استمرار، إبنه ← ابنه باستخدام أوب (9836)" (Notice the English comma after "(15)".) --Meno25 (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
You are very cunning. :) Thanks for your patience. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
What about rev 9837? Nobody mentioned combined F&R and TypoFix before. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
@Magioladitis: Bingo! Summary is correct on both Arabic and English Wikipedias. Thank you dearly for your effort and sorry for bothering you with so many bug reports. --Meno25 (talk) 13:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Woo! Woo! Finally!!! No bother at all. This was a bug I discovered by myself. I can't wait for the next one. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

  • Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic
    In fact, the majority are relatively evenly split between three themes: people of interest, television, and websites.
  • Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year
    In 2013, the arbitration committee closed 10 cases, 9 amendment requests, and 26 clarification requests.
  • In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer?
    On New Year's Day, an article by Tim Sampson published in The Daily Dot and republished shortly after on Mashable covered the currently ongoing medical disclaimer RfC.
  • News and notes: The year in review
    This was the year in which one journalist described the flagship site, Wikipedia, as "wickedly seductive". It was the year Wikipedia's replacement value was estimated at $6.6bn, its market value at "tens of billions of dollars", and its consumer benefit "hundreds of billions of dollars". But it was also the year in which one commentator forecast the decline of Wikipedia—that the project is in trouble from its shrinking volunteer workforce, skewed coverage, "crushing bureaucracy" and 90 percent male community.
  • WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition
    The year 2013 has come and gone, adding 50 new WikiProject Reports to our long list of projects we've had the privilege to meet. Last year saw the continuation of our Babel series, featuring WikiProjects from other languages of Wikipedia. We also expanded our selection of special reports, offering readers a growing collection of helpful tips and tools as they participate in WikiProjects.
  • Featured content: 2013—the trends
    Over the past year 1181 pieces of featured content were promoted. The most active of the featured content programs was featured picture candidates (FPC), which promoted an average of 46 pictures a month. This was followed by featured article candidates (FAC; 32.5 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 18 a month).
  • Technology report: Looking back on 2013
    2013 saw a lot of changes to MediaWiki software and Wikimedia infrastructure.

08:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Could you talk to a person.

I was very tempted to do a 24-hour block on user Yalladar. They are working on Jordanian football pages. They are reverting people. Adding unsourced material. Adding external links wrong. Adding facebook links that don't go to the right people. Just some general mayhem. I don't think they doing it with bad intent. Maybe their English isn't the greatest. Could you talk to them? Their Jordan national football team edits are the most worrisome. They are removing material for unknown reasons then keep reverting people. Bgwhite (talk) 08:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

@Bgwhite: I left him a message in Arabic although I believe, based on his contributions, that his English is not bad. Thank you for notifying me. --Meno25 (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. Whatever you left didn't work. They promptly reverted Jordan national football team for the 7th time this month and 17th time overall. I placed a 48-hour block. Hopefully they will get the message.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgwhite (talkcontribs)

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

  • Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
    Public Domain Day—January 1, 2014—gives me an opportunity to reflect on this important asset, mandated by the Constitution of the United States.
  • Traffic report: Tragedy and television
    The various maladies that befall humanity got some well-known faces this week: the death of the well-liked actor James Avery topped the list, but Michael Schumacher, who is in a coma after a skiing accident, also drew attention.
  • News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
    On 8 January, the Wikimedia Foundation notified the Wikimedia-l mailing list that Sarah Stierch, a popular Wikimedian and the Foundation's Program Evaluation Community Coordinator, was no longer an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation, as a result of being paid to create articles on the English Wikipedia.

09:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

  • Technology report: Architecture Summit schedule published
    The proposed schedule for the MediaWiki Archicture Summit has been published. The two main plenary sessions will be about HTML templating, and Service-oriented architecture.
  • Op-ed: Licensed for reuse? Citing open-access sources in Wikipedia articles
    It is heavily ironic that two decades after the World Wide Web was started — largely to make it easier to share scholarly research — most of our past and present research publications are still hidden behind paywalls for private profit. The bitter twist is that the vast majority of this research is publicly funded, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide each year.
  • Traffic report: The Hours are Ours
    We now can get a far more accurate picture of which short surges in popularity are likely natural and which are not.
  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Sociology
    This week, we studied human social behavior with the folks at WikiProject Sociology.

10:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Kat Walsh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kat Walsh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kat Walsh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jinkinson talk to me 15:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

  • News and notes: Modification of WMF protection brought to Arbcom
    The Wikimedia Foundation's Director of Community Advocacy's application of pending changes level two on the article Conventional PCI—an action taken under its rarely used office actions policy—has escalated to the Arbitration Committee after an editor upgraded it to full protection.
  • Featured content: Dr. Watson, I presume
    Fifteen articles, nine lists, twenty pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia over the last two weeks.
  • Special report: The few who write Wikipedia
    On 15 January, Wikipedia turned thirteen years old. In that time, this site has grown from a small site that was known to only a select few to one of the most popular websites on the internet. At the same time, recent data suggests that there is a power curve among users, where the comparative few who are writing most of Wikipedia have most of the edits. The result of this is that there is going to be bias in what is created, and how we deal with it as Wikipedians is indicative of the future of the site. Furthermore, this brings up what we have to do in order to combat this bias, as there are many ideas, but the question is whether they will work or not.
  • Technology report: Architecting the future of MediaWiki
    This week we're interviewing Brion Vibber about the then-upcoming Architecture Summit. Brion is a long time Wikipedian, the first employee of the Wikimedia Foundation, and currently the lead software architect working with the mobile team.
  • Traffic report: No show for the Globes
    While the 71st Golden Globe Awards, held on 12 January, had an impact on the top 25, their presence was largely absent from the Top 10. With the exception of Best Actor winner Leonardo DiCaprio, the only Golden Globe entrants in the Top 10 are films that would have been there anyway.