I am not a vandal. And you know it, you *BEEP*. (posted by Maywither)
How about we let other users decide then? Here are your edits which I classed as vandalism.
to the Planet Ant article, "I just saw this play there called The Weekend, and this chick Robbin Tenglin was in it, she was so hot I almost jizzed myself right there in the audience. Whoa!"
to the Rachel Ray article, "She is famous for cooking in the nude and using her pussy juice as an ingredient in most of her dishes".
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Kbdank7119:29, 23 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
I was checking up on the Planet Ant article I posted this summer, and I read your now historical comment about Nancy Hayden's excellent casting. Forgive me, but I chuckled for a loong time because you didn't self-censor where most of the audience members do self-censor. Most of the great up-and-coming actresses in Detroit do a few turns on the Planet Ant stage before moving on to Hollywood, marriage or another destination. After reading your quip, I had to ask myself, who is this actress? I was out of town when Ms. Hayden presented "The Weekend".
If you could tone it down a little, you could seriously help an actress's career by posting good bios on the WP.
I guess Ms. Robbin Tenglin is talented in the writing arena too, and a successful member of Detroit's Second City: www.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=5238
Come on there Bro in da Dirty D. Rep your city on the WP!
Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is there a specific reason why you came to the conclusion that she is "really old"? On Talk:Chelsea Handler I found that both her IMDB page and an article from the San Francisco Chronicle place her closer to 30. Qutezuce00:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — FireFox usertalk 12:49, 01 June '06
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — FireFox usertalk 12:55, 01 June '06
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — FireFox usertalk 12:58, 01 June '06
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. —getcrunkwhat?!23:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 19 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Equestrianism, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Petros47113:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Please stop removing warnings from your talk page. It is vandalism and your block could be extended because of it. Thanks KOS | talk14:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Canadian-Bacon07:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for uploading File:Beaumont tower.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.