Maye Fernandez

Hello!--mjf9089 (talk) 06:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Wow!! Mixtec Culture is simply one of the best first articles I have ever seen. The amount of work you put in is INCREDIBLE. I very much hope you stick around on Wikipedia, you would make for an invaluable addition. Don't be afraid to reach out to me if you have questions, or need help/advice. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

thank you very much! mjf9089 (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Early Modern Art

Hi, I can't see this surviving Afd, especially with no refs. Bear this in mind before spending too much time on it. It duplicates several better articles we already have, & uses the wrong terminology all the time. Johnbod (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

I will consider it, thank you! mjf9089 (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Hispano-Arabic homoerotic poetry

Hi! I'm noticing a lot of structural parallels between Hispano-Arabic homoerotic poetry and the spanish-language version of the article. Just to confirm before I put tags on the page for purposes of attribution, was this a translation of the Spanish-language Wikipedia article? — Mhawk10 (talk) 03:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes! it was a translation from the spanish language article. mjf9089 (talk) 03:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Hispano-Arabic homoerotic poetry

added links pointing to Abadi, Silves and Ibn Ammar

Habitability in yellow dwarf systems

added a link pointing to Yellow dwarf

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Thermally induced shape-memory effect (polymers)

Hello, mjf9089,

Thank you for creating Thermally induced shape-memory effect (polymers).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

we need to know which reference supports each sentence or paragraph in this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your commentary on the page. The thing about adding references is that the original featured article in Spanish doesn't have them. Since I only translated (as noted on the talk page of the article), I don't have any way to know which references correspond to each section. What can I do in such case? mjf9089 (talk) 22:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

It is a lot of work for the person who did not write it in the first place. I suppose you have to read all the references and the article, and figure out what supports what paragraph and sentence in the article. That will likely take longer than the original writing. We can ask user:Iqmann, though they have been inactive for 10 years. Also we learn that Spanish featured article may not meet the standards here (for DYK, GA or FA). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Mormyridae and Mormyridae (superfamily)

Maya, why do we need two articles on this topic? It certainly feels like a content fork? Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Ah, I see the page has been moved to Mormyroidea, so that's resolved. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Based on the other articles in other languages, and references and normal names for superfamilies, it looked to me as if the name should end in -oidea. I hope that is correct. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Olduvai per capita-en.png

Thanks for uploading File:Olduvai per capita-en.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

History of opera

Hi Maye Fernandez, How goes it. I do like these big articles your creating. The History of opera article is magic. It needs some work still. On reviewing it, Ref 33, 61, 76, 201, 254, 255, 256, 263, 350, 366, 578, 599, 651 have Harv errors. I have a script, when I review the page, it shows the page errors, i.e. on the references. For example, ref 33, when you click on it, it doesn't go anywhere. Are you wanting to repair them. It probably just needs the citation in. I see it now. "Harv error: link from CITEREFAzcárate_RistoriPérez_SánchezRamírez_Domínguez1983 doesn't point to any citation." It appears to be the one citation thats missing. A tiny overstep on a giant leap for wikipedia kind. Great article. scope_creep^Talk 10:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

I also noticed in the "Impressionism" section, there is a unfinished sentence, i.e. "beginning of the xx</ref>" scope_creep^Talk 11:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

hello! I definitely didn't notice those ref details but i'll be sure to check them out and get them fixed. same with the missing sentence in the "impressinism" section. thank you so much for your kind words! mjf9089 (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For the truly excellent History of opera and for all these other chunky articles your writing. I sincerely hope the good work continues. If you need any kind of help, please contact me. scope_creepTalk 11:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

thank you!! mjf9089 (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

History of Opera

Hi @Maye Fernandez: I notice there is still one reference thats still broken, ref:350. I trried to fix it. I think it either the "ref=DOI" or "ref=DOII". I'm not sure to be honest. scope_creep^Talk 20:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

i think i fixed it! please don't hesitate to let me know if everything else seems broken or odd. and thank you so much for your help! mjf9089 (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pollination of orchids

Hello, Maye Fernandez,

Thank you for creating Pollination of orchids.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are quite a few opinions expressed in Wikipedia's voice that need to be attributed to someone who holds that opinion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Jmcgnh}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Maye Fernandez

Thank you for creating Polnareff turtle.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maye Fernandez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 38.25.11.151.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline because your account isn't directly blocked. I recommend you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Maye Fernandez. Thank you for creating The Gardener (painting). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work. Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Floral Morphology

Thanks for the translation for Floral Morphology. VickKiang (talk) 00:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Queen (Lady Gaga song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Queen (Lady Gaga song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queen (Lady Gaga song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sricsi (talk) 19:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Translation attribution

Hello. The translations and overall work you do is great. There is a relevant help page about procedures of translated articles (Help:Translation). You can find a template there to add to your translation works (Template:Translated page). Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 01:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I will make sure to check the pages you've pointed out. mjf9089 (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Barn!

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		Outstanding translation work! Thinker78 (talk) 01:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Exploradores de España

Hola Maye. He mejorado y ampliado el artículo Exploradores de España en la wiki en español. Veo que te preocupaste en traducir y crear la misma entrada en inglés. ¿Puedes actualizarla? Gracias --Gilwellian (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Gracias por decirme. Lo tendré en consideración. mjf9089 (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from The Cerdá Plan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox.

Please do not remove maintenance tags on articles without resolving the problems. The second half of the article in undersouced - there are no citations on many of the paragraphs. Secondly, numerous "citations" are not citations at all, they point back to Wikipedia in Spanish. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source here on en-WP. These claims need to be sourced to verifiable, published secondary reliable sources. I noticed that the article was translated from Spanish to English. Spanish Wikipedia may have different guidelines for article references than English Wikipedia, but we need to abide by en-WP guidelines. It will be a beautiful article when it is completed. Netherzone (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Dieleghembos

Hi Maye,

you renamed the page Dielegembos into Dieleghembos, contributing the change to a spellingmistake. What would you consider as source for that decision? Naming things in the English Wikipedia for bi-lingual Brussels is indeed notoriously hard (and sensitive). Dieleghembos is old Dutch spelling, where Dielegembos is current spelling.

by the way, did you notice that your OKA-colleague who wrote the article broke two of the reference links?

Greetings from Brussels, SvenDK (talk) 04:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello!

I used information from the wikidata page and since it didn't list "Dielegembos" as an alternate name, I assumed it would be better to rename it to the variant "Dieleghembos". If I was wrong and you think I should change it back, I'll be happy to do so, but this was my discerning criteria.

As for the references, I didn't notice them, but I can look at them later. It would be really helpful if you could also point out the error if you'd like. At OKA we don't write articles, we focus on translation, but the person who translated this particular article is no longer with us, so I'll improve some of her work overtime.

Thanks for the feedback! mjf9089 (talk) 04:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I double checked to be sure. All legal publications I found referred to Dielegembos, without h. I updated wikidata and added my source: https://etaamb.openjustice.be/nl/besluit-van-de-brusselse-hoofdstedelijke-regering_n2021020324

probably best you change the title again.

SvenDK (talk) 18:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Noted! Will change it back. Thank you for your help! mjf9089 (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks and note

Hey, thank you for your recent contributions to Chinese-language related articles. One note: I would take a look at MOS:ZH, the part of our Manual of Style pertaining to China and the Chinese language. Specifically: pinyin with diacritics is generally not used inline in body text; its use is usually reserved for when a transliteration of Chinese characters is requires. But that's a minor point, cheers! — Remsense诉 02:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I'll look into it. Thanks for the suggestion! mjf9089 (talk) 02:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Wooden house has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wooden house. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wooden house (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

Nice writing but unnecessary. What may be expected is to explain the concept of wooden houses, ways of building and likely examples, and not splitting them when there is a disambiguation page, Wood House.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wooden house and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Maye Fernandez! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of Algeciras has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Algeciras. Thanks! OnlyNano^talk 02:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Algeciras has been accepted

History of Algeciras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Maye Fernandez. Thank you for your work on Ikon on the Road. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add this phrase to the target page with a good ref

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Maye Fernandez! Your additions to Architecture of Urartu have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I will be more careful in the future. mjf9089 01:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Modertrans Poznań has been accepted

Modertrans Poznań, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perfect Symfonicznie has been accepted

Perfect Symfonicznie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Markowa massacre (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AirshipJungleman29 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ulma family instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree with the previous reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Markowa massacre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion! I'll take it into consideration :D mjf9089 00:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albufera Natural Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reconquest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casa de los Vitoria has been accepted

Casa de los Vitoria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Charlie (talk) 06:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: La Lanterne (newspaper) has been accepted

La Lanterne (newspaper), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zeromonk (talk) 09:29, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Bridge (Tours) has been accepted

Wilson Bridge (Tours), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye (philologhical journal) (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye (philologhical journal) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 23:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for this edit. It didn't make sense to me at the time when the tag was placed, so you saved me from reverting and writing a rather long and confusing edit summary! Plasticwonder (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

No problem! mjf9089 21:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decree of 29 March 1815 has been accepted

Decree of 29 March 1815, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Earth605^talk 06:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		WikiProject Spain Barnstar
		Thank you for translating multiple Spanish articles and for creating articles such as History of Algeciras Keep up with the excellent work! You should consider joining WP:SPAIN. Earth605talk 07:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! 😇 I will consider it! mjf9089 06:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Two articles needed

Hello my friend, I am new to this, can you please translate to English two articles about christianity in Mozambique: Diocese of Alto Molócue (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diocese_de_Alto_Mol%C3%B3cu%C3%A8) and Diocese of Caia (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diocese_de_Caia)? These entities are new. If you cannot, do you know whom I can ask for it? Thank you! Today2026-33995 (talk) 08:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for reaching out!

The issue with the pages you linked is that they need more verifiable sources to meet EN wiki source requirements. Otherwise, the community will likely contest, decline, or delete them, which makes them of low priority for any translator.

You can check WP:N for more information on what makes an article eligible to have its own page. I hope you find helpful information there! mjf9089 02:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freies Gymnasium Bern (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:ORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freies Gymnasium Bern and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulus Züblin has been accepted

Paulus Züblin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 18:54, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmen Moreno Pérez has been accepted

Carmen Moreno Pérez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 09:06, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dieter Süverkrüp has been accepted

Dieter Süverkrüp, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nil ^nz 04:24, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Turda (196 BC) has been accepted

Battle of Turda (196 BC), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- PhilDaBirdMan (Talk | Contribs) 22:53, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1985 Swiss right-to-life initiative (April 25)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

The same problem as before. Every single source used here is primary - a government related source, and primary sources in this context cannot be used to demonstrate notability. That must come via reliable secondary sources, which in this case is probably going to be newspaper or RTS reports. Using primary for verification purposes is OK, but for anything controversial it is best to gind a secondary source. The reason being is that if everything is primary then as some point this is going to be regarded as original research, which Wikipedia does not do. See WP:NOR.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:1985 Swiss right-to-life initiative to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1900 Swiss direct election and increase in members of the Federal Council initiative (May 17)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, GreenRedFlag, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Improve tone

Provide secondary reference

Keep encylopedic writing

Next steps

• Edit Draft:1900 Swiss direct election and increase in members of the Federal Council initiative to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Olduvai theory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olduvai theory, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olduvai theory (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)