LocalF15

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi LocalF15. Thank you for your work on Swedish invasion of Norway (1716). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:10, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Horn's Scanian campaign

Do you mind if I work on Draft:Horn's Scanian campaign? I figured I'd ask since it's your draft. Gvssy (talk) 20:54, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Nah, you can work on it. Regarding Vessberg's book (which is the most extensive work on Horn's campaign), you can find it here at LIBRIS. I've also linked the other sources I planned to use in the Bibliography part. LocalF15 (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Especially for Vessberg's book, I had tried to find it earlier to no avail. Gvssy (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hi LocalF15, regarding this edit, the first/last name sections in the citation are for the names of individual authors. So, for example, you replaced "agency = Associated Press" with what looks like "first name = Associated, last name = Press" DiodotusNicator (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I guess you can restore the previous revision then. Unless it has been updated (?) LocalF15 (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Avoiding an edit war

Hi LocalF15, you hadn't been informed about this before; standardized advice follows. See also: WP:DISCFAIL, a very helpful essay.

Hi LocalF15! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you.

Regarding the currently-open thread at WP:ANEW, you should have been notified by the reporter using {{an3-notice}} and you were unaware of the policy, so the resolution is only a warning ().

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi LocalF15. Thank you for your work on Carl Bennedich. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:20, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Source

Hello. I was curious if you had access to Striden om Jämtland by Birger Steckzén, since you put it in the bibliography on your draft, Jämtland campaigns (1644–1645). I believe it discusses a campaign I'm going to write about (Henrik Fleming's expedition to Jämtland) and I haven't been able to find a copy of it myself. Thanks! Gvssy (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I do, yeah. His article is public domain where I'm from but I'm not sure how I can send it to you. Any ideas, then? LocalF15 (talk) 12:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Is it on a website? Gvssy (talk) 13:08, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, Google Books. I assume you aren't able to view or download it, correct? I might be able to send a PDF on Discord or Wikimedia. LocalF15 (talk) 13:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, can't view it. I'll add you on Discord when I'm home if that works. Gvssy (talk) 13:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Sounds good LocalF15 (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Kexholm (1710)

Hello, LocalF15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Kexholm (1710), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cinderella157 (talk) 22:56, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2026 (UTC)