Wikipedia

User talk:Legoktm/January 2013

< User talk:Legoktm
Latest comment: 13 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 28 January 2013

OTRS permission tags

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. :) Thanks for documenting the permission for Gene expression programming at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 October 14. I just wanted to let you know that the permission tag you placed on the article's talk page - {{PermissionOTRS}} - is for file pages. It doesn't include mention of the source, so it's not really usable for article talk pages. (Files name their source in the file description, of course.) {{ConfirmationOTRS}} was designed for article talk pages. It includes parameters to name the source and also identify which license applies. I've changed the template out, but just wanted to make the distinction for future reference. :) (And happy New Year!) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I wasn't aware of that template, thanks. I'll try and go back through a few other talk pages I might have used that template on. Legoktm (talk) 08:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
    In the impersonal, detached Colosseum that is Wikipedia, people find it much easier to put their thumbs down. As such, many people active in the Wikimedia movement have witnessed a precipitous decline in civil discourse. This is far from a new trend, yet many people would agree that it all seemed somehow worse in 2012.
  • In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
    A recent, poorly researched and poorly written story in the Register highlighted the perceived "cash rich" status of the Wikimedia movement. ... The Telegraph and Daily Dot, among others, have alleged that there are multiple links between the WMF, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, and Kazakhstan's government, which is, for all intents and purposes, a one-party non-democratic state.
  • Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
    In the first of two features, the Signpost this week looks back on 2012, a year when developers finally made inroads into three issues that had been put off for far too long (the need for editors to learn wiki-markup, the lack of a proper template language and the centralisation of data) but left all three projects far from finished.
  • Interview: Interview with Brion Vibber, the WMF's first employee
    Brion Vibber has been a Wikipedia editor for nearly 11 years and was the first person officially hired to work for the Wikimedia Foundation. He was instrumental in early development of the MediaWiki software and is now the lead software architect for the foundation's mobile development team.
  • Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
    At the beginning of the year, we began a series of interviews with editors who have worked hard to combat systemic bias through the creation of featured content; although we haven't seen six installments yet, we've also had some delightful interviews with people who write articles on some of our most core topics. Now, as we close the year, I would like to present some of my own musings on the state of featured content—especially as it pertains to systemic bias and core topics.
  • WikiProject report: New Year, New York
    This week, we're celebrating the New Year from Times Square by interviewing WikiProject New York City. Since December 2004, WikiProject NYC has had the difficult task of maintaining articles about the largest city in the United States, many of which are also among the the most viewed articles on Wikipedia. The project is home to 22 Featured Articles, 7 Featured Lists, 32 pieces of Featured Media, and a lengthy list of Did You Know? entries.
  • Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
    Northeastern University researcher Brian Keegan analyzed the gathering of hundreds of Wikipedians to cover the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy. ... A First Monday article reviews several aspects of the Wikipedia participation in the 18 January 2012, protests against SOPA and PIPA legislation in the USA. The paper focuses on the question of legitimacy, looking at how the Wikipedia community arrived at the decision to participate in those protests.

Wikidata weekly summary #39

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Running reports that make direct database queries on the toolserver

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Legoktm, you seem to be very bot-savvy, I'm hoping you can shed light on something. A project I'm doing some work for (WP:MEDICINE) would like to be able to write and customize its own reports. We've been using Mr.Z-man's popular pages report on the Toolserver, but we'd like to customize it further. Z-man's code is publicly available but it makes direct database calls and of course it's no use to run remotely. I see the instructions on how to ask for a Toolserver account. Do you have any more info on this process? Can just anyone who asks for a Toolserver account get one? Anything else one should know? (Is this even your area of interest or expertise?) Cheers... Zad68 05:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Essentially the toolserver roots/WMDE decide who gets a Toolserver account. AFAIK the criteria are being able to use the resources, and trustworthy enough not to violate any of the rules. If you know what you're doing, getting an account would be really beneficial. Otherwise, it might be easier to find a WP:MEDICINE user to run the queries for you. If you do need some help, I can try and point you in the right direction, but I don't think I would have enough time to help run queries for you. Hope this helps, Legoktm (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Working out the details at Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The RFC for TAFI is nearing it's conclusion, and it's time to hammer out the details over at the project's talk page. There are several details of the project that would do well with wider input and participation, such as the article nomination and selection process, the amount and type of articles displayed, the implementation on the main page and other things. I would like to invite you to comment there if you continue to be interested in TAFI's development. --NickPenguin(contribs) 02:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Op-ed: Meta, where innovative ideas die
    Meta is the wiki that has coordinated a wide range of cross-project Wikimedia activities, such as the activities of stewards, the archiving of chapter reports, and WMF trustee elections. The project has long been an out-of-the-way corner for technocratic working groups, unaccountable mandarins, and in-house bureaucratic proceedings. Largely ignored by the editing communities of projects such as Wikipedia and organizations that serve them, Meta has evolved into a huge and relatively disorganized repository, where the few archivists running it also happen to be the main authors of some of its key documents. While Meta is well-designed for supporting the librarians and mandarins who stride along its corridors, visitors tend to find the site impenetrable—or so many people have argued over the past decade. This impenetrability runs counter to Meta's increasingly central role in the Wikimedia movement.
  • WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
    The dawning of a new year offers both a fresh slate and an opportunity to revisit our previous adventures. 2012 marked the fifth anniversary of the WikiProject Report and was the column's most productive year with 52 articles published. In addition to sharing the experiences of Wikipedia's many active projects, we expanded our scope to highlight unique projects from other languages of Wikipedia, and tracked down all of the former editors-in-chief of the Signpost for an introspective interview ... While last year's "Summer Sports Series" may have drawn yawns from some readers, a special report on "Neglected Geography" elicited more comments than any previous issue of the Report. Following in the footsteps of our past three recaps, we'll spend this week looking back at the trials and tribulations of the WikiProjects we encountered in 2012. Where are they now?
  • News and notes: 2012—the big year
    The past 12 months have seen a multitude of issues and events in the Wikimedia foundation, the movement at large, and the English Wikipedia. The movement, now in its second decade, is growing apace in its international reach, cultural and linguistic diversity, technical development, and financial complexity; and many factors have combined to produce what has in many ways been the biggest, most dynamic year in the movement's history. Looking back at 2012, we faced a difficult task in doing justice to all of the notable events in a single article; so the Signpost has selected just a few examples from outside the anglosphere, from the English Wikipedia, and from the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than attempting to cover every detail that happened.
  • Featured content: Featured content in review
    Over the past year, 963 pieces of featured content were promoted. The most active of the featured content programs was featured article candidates (FAC), which promoted an average of 31 articles a month. This was followed by featured picture candidates (FPC; 28 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 20 a month). Featured topic and featured portal candidates remained sluggish, each promoting fewer than 20 items over the year.
  • Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
    Following on from last week's reflections on 2012, this week the Technology report looks ahead to 2013, a year that will almost certainly be dominated by the juggernauts of Wikidata, Lua and the Visual Editor.

Wikidata weekly summary #40

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Important

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey I know this is completely off topic but if i copy and paste a part of a wiki article into my essay and include reference is it still plagiarizing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby55412 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Probably. This article has more information and can give you a better answer. Legoktm (talk) 05:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

A Special Award

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It looks like you need more lego!
For officially breaking Wikipedia :) ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 19:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
    After six years without creating a new class of content projects, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has finally expanded into a new area: travel. Wikivoyage was formally launched—though without a traditional ship's christening—on 15 January, having started as a beta trial on 10 November. Wikivoyage has been taken under the WMF's umbrella on the argument that information resources that help with travel are educational and therefore within the scope of the foundation's mission.g
  • News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
    On January 16, voting for the first round of the 2012 Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year contest will begin. Wikimedia editors with 75 edits or one project are eligible to vote to select their favorite image featured in 2012. ... On January 15, the foundation launched its latest grant scheme, called Individual Engagement Grants (IEG).
  • WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
    This week, we set off for the final frontier with WikiProject Astronomy. The project was started in August 2006 using the now-defunct WikiProject Space as inspiration. WikiProject Astronomy is home to 101 pieces of Featured material and 148 Good Articles maintained by a band of 186 members. The project maintains a portal, works on an assortment of vital astronomy articles, and provides resources for editors adding or requesting astronomy images.
  • Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
    Comforting those grieving after the loss of a loved one is an impossible task. How then, can an entire community be comforted? The Internet struggled to answer that question this week after the suicide of Aaron Swartz, a celebrated free-culture activist, programmer, and Wikipedian at the age of 26.
  • Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
    Continuing our recap of the featured content promoted in 2012, this week the Signpost interviewed three editors, asking them about featured articles which stuck out in their minds. Two, Ian Rose and Graham Colm, are current featured article candidates (FAC) delegates, while Brian Boulton is an active featured article writer and reviewer.
  • Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
    The Wikidata client extension was successfully deployed to the Hungarian Wikipedia on 14 January, its team reports. The interwiki language links can now come from wikidata.org, though "manual" interwiki links remain functional, overriding those from the central repository.

Start date

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Just curious: would you mind requesting approval for the {{Start date}} bot request for {{Infobox NRHP}}? What opposition exists was either opposition to the concept (Doncram) or someone telling us to get approval before deploying this microformat (Hellknowz), and since community consensus supported deploying the microformat, neither one is particularly relevant. Thanks for all of your bot-coding work! Nyttend (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

I haven't been able to follow all the discussion on the botreq, so I would like to read through that and the RfC's just to make sure I'm not missing anything and up to speed on everything.
As it stands, I have the code written for the first stage (wrapping just years with the template), and I'd like to implement the month part too before going ahead and requesting approval.
I'd also like to have the bot scan the database dump to reduce server load, however that should be easy to implement. Legoktm (talk) 07:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Mark a lot of pages for microformatting

May I remind you about WP:BOTREQ#Mark a lot of pages for microformatting? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

See #Start date above. I'll try and get to it by the end of the week. Legoktm (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry; I missed that. And thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Nudge ;-) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm really sorry, the semester just started and I'm rather busy right now trying to get some of my existing tasks back online. This is rather low on my priorities list right now, so it will be a while until I can get to it. If you would like it done sooner rather than later, it might be worth getting another bot op to take it on. :/ Legoktm (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

What stats

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

restoring ITN template, used for stats, etc ? What stats? - Youreallycan 08:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

The most obvious one: how many pages have been on the ITN section. I'm not sure why it's an advantage to not have it there though. Legoktm (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Bot treats

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Some bot yummies

Thanks for your help emptying that stub category with Legobot. Please give it these treats for me. delldot ∇. 03:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem! :) Legoktm (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Simple English proposal at the Pump

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

As one of the participants in the Bot Request about getting the Simple Wiki to the top of the Languages, you are invited to participate in the reopened discussion of the same. Your feedback will be appreciated.

Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I commented there. Legoktm (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #41

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I saw your recent edit where you removed the https prefix on some URLS and you mentioned protocol-relative links. Will this always work? I'm often annoyed when I see padlocked diffs that go to a URL beginning with 'https://'. Your scheme may avoid the issue and allow everyone to have what they want. If it's safe to do so I would start submitting diffs in protocol-relative form wherever diffs are expected. Is this documented anywhere? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Yup, it'll always work since the protocol is actually chosen by your browser. I found mw:MediaWiki_1.18#Protocol-relative_URLs which explains it well. Legoktm (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Article feedback

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Thanks for opening and advertising Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Article feedback; I appreciate it. :-) And I hope you post a view of your own, if you feel up to it. I'm interested in your thoughts on the future of this tool. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I'm nearly done with drafting it and will post shortly :) Legoktm (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas (2)

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Legoktm (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey boss,

Have a slight issue with this article, as you're aware, which you may be able to help with. Recently “Uncyclopedia” has split into two different entities. As a very quick history lesson:

  • Site was originally opened at Uncyclopedia.org
  • Domain was purchased by Wikia a few years back, and had been moved over to Wikia servers piecemeal, so that the original site closed and became Uncyclopedia.wikia.com
  • The community has recently forked, so that there is almost identical content at Wikia sub-domain, and en.uncyclopedia.co

Which has meant that the community at the “new” domain is trying to pimp out their own variant of it, while the community at the “old” domain has been trying to keep their existing status alive. This has led to some more hawkish elements trying to create competition between the two. I'm definitely not impartial - neither is K7L(?), Isarra, Aimsplode, or numerous others who I've had edit wars on this article with in the past. But I'm trying to find an agreeable compromise where both domains are equally reflected. With the exception of me mistyping the URI of the new domain, I'd been trying to have the links relating back to both. I had changed back the sources to where they had originally been linked as well.

While this secondary aspect is unimportant - and fairness suggests that having half go one way and half go the other, as they lead to equally viable sources - having both domains reflected in the info box and in the “external links” section is relevant. And given the content of both sites is near identical, and both have a claim to being Uncyclopedia - because they both are - stripping this page of one or the other URI is inaccurate. Alexa doesn't help in determining which is more “popular” as the newer domain has only been in place for a short period (realistically only a fortnight since it has been “open”), and the older domain reflects the entirety of wikia.com, of which Uncyclopedia is 1.10% of the total.

I want to have as little as possible to do with keeping the Wikipedia entry accurate and equitable. But as there is an active element trying to remove all links to the Wikia sub-domain from every source possible and replace it with the newer domain, being inactive on this means allowing in accuracy and inconsistency to become part of the page relating back to the twin communities. And create two separate entries for this page is ridiculous at this stage.

Can I rely upon the Wikipedian community to come to an agreeable compromise on this - ideally those that have no vested interest in one side of the other, and maintain the page as NPOV as possible? If so, I'm happy to walk away and leave it in your capable hands.

As an aside - do you have a semi-automated method by which I can go through the Wikia based site and remove all hard-coded links written as “http://Uncyclopedia.wikia.com…” with “[{{fullurl:…”? Your coding knowledge and ability to create a decent bot is obviously superior to mine. PuppyOnTheRadio talk —Preceding undated comment added 23:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. Unfortunately I'm a tad busy right now, so I think it's best if you re-post this (preferably in an abbreviated version :P) on Talk:Uncyclopedia under what K7L wrote. A third opinion has been requested, so hopefully that will be able to resolve the dispute as well.
As far as your bot question is, yes, you could probably look into using replace.py combined with Special:LinkSearch, however I would caution with doing an automated mass-replacement since it can interfere with system messages, javascript, and other things. Legoktm (talk) 09:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

A starbarn for you!

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Pending edits!

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Do they count "rejecting pending edits" too under 3RR? And can you give me the coding guide of freenode chat (how to ping someone etc)?--Tito Dutta (talk) 12:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hm. I would probably say yes, since it technically makes an edit. I suppose one way around that is simply not to approve it :P
Wikipedia:IRC/Tutorial has some helpful information. To ping someone you can just type their username, so right now mine is "duh", so just say "duh: hello". I've also set my client up so if you use my real username, "legoktm", that notifies me as well. Legoktm (talk) 12:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
    The English Wikipedia's requests for adminship (RfA) process has entered another cycle of proposed reforms. Over the last three weeks, various proposals, ranging from as large as a transition to a representative democracy to as small as a required edit count and service length, have been debated on the RfA talk page. The total number of new administrators for 2012 was just 28, barely more than half of 2011's total and less than a quarter of 2009's total. The total number of unsuccessful RfAs has fallen as well. These declining numbers, which were described in what would now be considered a successful year (2010) as an emerging "wikigeneration gulf", have been coupled with a sharp decline in the number of active administrators since February 2008 (1,021), reaching a low of 653 in November 2012.
  • WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
    This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Linguistics. Started in January 2004, the project has grown to include 7 Featured Articles, 4 Featured Lists, 2 A-class Articles, and 15 Good Articles maintained by 43 members. The project's members keep an eye on several watchlists, maintain the linguistics category, and continue to build a collection of Did You Know? entries. The project is home to six task forces and works with WikiProject Languages and WikiProject Writing Systems.
  • Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
    This week, the Signpost's featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured topics. We interviewed Grapple X and GamerPro64, who are delegates at the featured topic candidates.
  • Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
    The opening of the Doncram case marks the end of almost 6 months without any open cases, the longest in the history of the Committee.
  • Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
    On 22 January, WMF staff and contractors switched incoming, non-cached requests (including edits) to the Foundation's newer data centre in Ashburn, Virginia, making it responsible for handling almost all regular traffic. For the first time since 2004, virtually no traffic will be handled by the WMF's other facility in Tampa, Florida.

X!

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

That can't be my address or yours, please see the response on X!'s page.—cyberpower ChatOffline 00:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Yup I goofed :( Legoktm (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
It happens.  :)—cyberpower ChatOffline 00:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

OTRS comment

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure if you were aware of it or not, but we have the {{OTRS received}} template specifically for this purpose. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

I know about that template now, but I might have not back then. Thanks regardless :) Legoktm (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm running for what now?

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for swiftly disappearificating my surprise RfB... whilst it's nice to be appreciated, I think most people would just go with a barnstar... Yunshui 雲‍水 21:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I can tell you got quite a shock :P Legoktm (talk) 03:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "User talk:Littleolive_oil#Height_and_weight_on_Olga_Korbut".

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! Mjeromee (talk) 23:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks but no thanks. I'm rather tangentially involved and don't have an opinion either way really. Legoktm (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #42

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Updated demo system
    • Improved design of sites code in core
    • Fixed SQLite compatibility
    • Worked on implementing references handling in statements user interface
    • Useful error messages will be shown in statements user interface in case of data value mismatches
    • Switched the demo system to Labs’ puppet
    • Selenium tests for length constraint, claim edit-conflicts
    • Setting up dispatcher script on internal test machine
    • More work on wikibase.getEntities() function for Scribunto/Lua-Templates
    • AbuseFilter is now working with Wikibase
    • The change dispatcher script is now ready for use on the WMF cluster
    • Initial implementation of {{#property}} parser function for the client
    • Created a widget for the client to connect a page to a Wikidata item and add interwiki language links to a page
    • Preparing a page to list unconnected pages on the clients
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 14:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

My username

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Because of the disagreement, I've placed a request for comment up. You are welcome to discuss it here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_names#sales002k.40suttonlea.org (yes I did copy that straight out of a URL).--90.217.236.85 (talk) 11:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, please do not give 100% wrong advice to people. If you do not know policies, please do not respond to help requests. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
You're right, I misread the policy. The version I read said:

Email addresses and URLs (such as "Alice@example.com" and "Example.com"). Plain domain names (without .com, .co.kr, etc.) are sometimes acceptable, such as when the purpose is simply to identify the user as a person, but they are inappropriate if they promote a commercial Web page.

I misread the period after the ) as a , which would have implied that emails are ok in limited circumstances, which I believed the user met. However this wasn't the case, and my reading of the policy was inaccurate. wctaiwan has reworded that section, so it will be less likely to misread. I will leave a comment at the RfCN about my confusion and mistake. Sorry about that, Legoktm (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Bot updates for MILHIST showcase

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey, I was wondering if you'd had a chance to add the MILHIST showcase page update tasks to Legobot's schedule? Like I said before, it's not urgent, but I wanted to make sure it doesn't drop off the radar. Thanks! Kirill [talk] 14:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Oops. I finished the code, and never scheduled it run. Will do tonight. Sorry about that. Legoktm (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks again for all your help with this! Kirill [talk] 19:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

thank you

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

thank you for removing the tag.

I have nothing else to contribute to Dead Linger right now. I remember when new pages were encouraged - how times have changed!

thank you again. Igottheconch (talk) 09:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Legoktm for being kind enough and having enough foresight to realize the importance of new pages. you are an asset to the project. thank you Igottheconch (talk) 09:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
No worries, glad to see you've added more content to it. I also noticed that it's currently 474B, are you interested in making it a DYK? Just needs a 3x expansion :) Legoktm (talk) 18:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on the AFT5 Request for Comment

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Legoktm - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Again for your help!

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks again for your help squashing the vandalism on my talk page. You should be rewarded for being polite, helpful, and diligent. --Thomas (The Lord of Time) (talk) 20:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem! Let me know on IRC or here if you ever need any other help! Legoktm (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

CCI push

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey. I'm sending you this since you helped out during the initial rush at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Ktr101. It's now down to the final 200 articles, less then that technically, and if we were to all do a few a day we could probably wrap this one up in a week. Hopefully you'll be able to help out again. Wizardman 04:22, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Yay! Will take a look. Legoktm (talk) 07:57, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
    On New Year's Day, the Daily Dot reported that a "massive Wikipedia hoax" had been exposed after more than five years. The article on the Bicholim conflict had been listed as a "Good Article" for the past half-decade, yet turned out to be an ingenious hoax. Created in July 2007 by User:A-b-a-a-a-a-a-a-b-a, the meticulously detailed piece was approved as a GA in October 2007. A subsequent submission for FA was unsuccessful, but failed to discover that the article's key sources were made up. While the User:A-b-a-a-a-a-a-a-b-a account then stopped editing, the hoax remained listed as a Good Article for five years, receiving in the region of 150 to 250 page views a month in 2012. It was finally nominated for deletion on 29 December 2012 by ShelfSkewed—who had discovered the hoax while doing work on Category:Articles with invalid ISBNs—and deleted the same day.
  • WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
    When we challenged the masters of WikiProject Chess to an interview, Sjakkalle answered our call. WikiProject Chess dates back to December 2003 and has grown to include 4 Featured Articles and 15 Good Articles maintained by over 100 members. The project typically operates independently of other WikiProjects, although the project would theoretically be a child of WikiProject Board and Table Games (interviewed in 2011). WikiProject Chess provides a collection of resources, seeks missing photographs of chess players, and helps determine ways that Wikipedia's coverage of chess can be expanded.
  • News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
    To many Wikimedians, the Khan Academy would seem like a close cousin: the academy is a non-profit educational website and a development of the massive open online course concept that has delivered over 227 million lessons in 22 different languages. Its mission is to give "a free, world-class education to anyone, anywhere." This complements Wikipedia's stated goal to "imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge", then go and create that world. It should come as no surprise, then, that the highly successful GLAM-Wiki (galleries, libraries, archives, museums) initiative has partnered with the Khan Academy's Smarthistory project to further both its and Wikipedia's goals.
  • Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
    This week, the Signpost featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured lists. We interviewed FLC directors Giants2008 and The Rambling Man as well as active reviewer and writer PresN.
  • Arbitration report: Doncram continues
    The Doncram case has continued into its third week.
  • Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
    As reported in last week's "Technology Report", the WMF's data centre in Ashburn, Virginia took over responsibility for almost all of the remaining functions that had previously been handled by their old facility in Tampa, Florida on 22 January. The Signpost reported then that few problems had arisen since handover. Unfortunately that was not to remain the case, with reports of caching problems (which typically only affect anonymous users) starting to come in.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legoktm/January_2013&oldid=1271576328"