Lasourisrose

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Lasourisrose, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:ROTI method to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
• Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 21:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Return on Time Invested method has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Return on Time Invested method. Thanks! Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Lasourisrose, I see you didn't respond to the draft comment above and have now created a copy of your draft in mainspace at Return on time invested. Can you clarify whether you used any AI tools to write the content? Thanks. --Belbury (talk) 10:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Belbury, thank you for helping with the article! It’s way easier for me now that you mentioned the sections. The validation process would not advance, it kept adding days so I created the article. Is it possible to delete the previous draft? I created the content using different sources and I used AI in order to structure it and correct my English. I tried not to be subjective and I understand that those sections need to be improved. Thanks again for your help! Lasourisrose (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. The section edits were from other users, I just removed the roti.express link that you'd put at the end of the article.

If you want the draft deleted I'll just remove the pending review template from the top, it will be automatically deleted eventually. Belbury (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, Lasourisrose. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Return on time invested ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Sam.

Thank you for your message. I am deeply attached to Wikipedia's neutrality, my goal is to produce the best possible article while complying with Wikipedia guidelines.

The ROTI method is used in many of the software development teams where I have worked so I thought it would be nice to share the concept with a larger audience. Unfortunately, there isn't that much serious bibliography about the subject. It is even harder if sources from BFM Business, France's first business news channel with 47 million people watching it every month, are not accepted? ROTI.express is used in most CAC40 companies, equivalent to S&P 500 in France. So the app is well-known in the software development niche. I thought that it would be interesting for everyone else to learn more about the concept through the eyes of what seems to be the only company in the world that is 100% focused on the ROTI method.

I guess that it is difficult to write about things that are happening around us but haven't been put into academical works yet.

Please, let me know what do you think. Thank you for your time. Lasourisrose (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

• roti.express: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.roti.express

Proposed deletion of Meeting science

The article Meeting science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As the tags indicate, this page is a mess. It is AI generated, not structured properly for an encyclopedic article, contains many unsourced claims and WP:OR statements and a lot of WP:SYNTH. Since there are no indications that this is going to be improved by the originator or any other editors, and it is past the 3 month window for draftification a PROD or AfD seems the right course. (I would be OK with a draftification.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your message @Ldm1954.

Can you transform the article to Draft?

This would allow me to improve it without losing the content.

Best, Lasourisrose (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)