No messages have been posted for this user yet. To start a page called User talk:Kympubs, type in the box below. When you are done, preview the page to check for errors and then publish it.

Kympubs, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit


Teahouse logo

Hi Kympubs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Construction number

edit
Notice

The article Construction number has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and mathematically trivial

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.David Eppstein (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Construction number

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Construction number requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. LaundryPizza03 (d) 22:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Cúcuta explosion (December 17)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Camilo Daza International Airport. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of the information in this draft is already in the parent article. There is not enough additional information to warrant a separate article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Criticism about Greta Thunberg

edit

Hello Kympubs. I have moved the page you created to Criticism of Greta Thunberg (correcting the grammar) and then blanked-and-redirected it to Greta Thunberg. I did this because 1) we already have comprehensive, well-sourced coverage of criticism and mockery of Thunberg in that article, in the "Public response and impact" section; and 2) we generally don't maintain articles devoted entirely to criticism of a person, especially not a living person, as they violate our neutral point of view and biographies of living persons policy. Joe (talk) 12:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Memes about Greta Thunberg" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Memes about Greta Thunberg. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 19#Memes about Greta Thunberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit