KnowledgeMaple

Welcome!

Hello, KnowledgeMaple, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnDavies9612 (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome, JohnDavies9612! I’m excited to start contributing and learning more about how Wikipedia works. I appreciate the helpful links you shared and will definitely go through them. Looking forward to making more edits and improvements here.

— KnowledgeMaple (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Orthodontics have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tony 19:15, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Tony, thanks for the heads-up. I see now that the link didn’t meet WP:EL. I’ll stick to neutral, authoritative sources going forward. In my opinion, it was a strong piece that added context to the topic, but I understand the guideline and appreciate your guidance. KnowledgeMaple (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GoldRomean. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GoldRomean (talk) 14:14, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronen Plot (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Check your sources for red errors - fill in the access-date parameters. Let me know if you have questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronen Plot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello GoldRomean,

Thank you for reviewing Draft:Ronen Plot. I understand your concerns about tone and sourcing.

I did nothing intentionally promotional — my goal is to build a neutral, factual article.

I plan to rewrite the draft directly from reliable sources such as Times of Israel, Jerusalem Post, and Haaretz, making sure every statement is well cited and the language is neutral.

If you have any suggestions about which sources best establish notability for Ronen Plot (beyond municipal websites), I’d really appreciate your guidance.

Thanks again for your time and feedback.

KnowledgeMaple (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! If you are using AI for most (if not all) of your edits/talk page messages; please stop. I wrote almost nothing about promo in my decline; the main reason was that it was clearly AI-generated. AI can make stuff up (and you have a section comprised of something along the lines of "add info here"). GoldRomean (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

GoldRomean,

I recognize your critiques on tone and sourcing. I have your proposed edits in good faith. I will revise the draft again using only reputable and independent news sources (e.g., Times of Israel, Jerusalem Post, and Haaretz) to achieve a neutral tone and will fix the citations in the bibliography.

Which of the source types you mentioned do you see as most important in this case to show the subject's notability? I want to be sure that this revision meets your AfC expectations.

Thanks again for your guidance,

KnowledgeMaple (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, KnowledgeMaple! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tekhelet. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tekhelet was changed by KnowledgeMaple (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955708 on 2025-09-26T14:07:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I believe my edit to *Tekhelet* was constructive and not vandalism. This seems to be a false positive by ClueBot NG. I will continue editing in good faith according to Wikipedia’s guidelines.

KnowledgeMaple (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Please use Preview

Hi there, I see that you were trying to improve a footnote in your recent edit of The Little Mermaid (video game), but it resulted in an error. I don't think you can nest ref tags like that. I've restored the original version. Please make sure to always use Preview to reveal such issues before submitting your work; I'll attach some info below. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to The Little Mermaid (video game), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Jessicapierce, thanks for pointing that out. In preview everything looked fine on my end, so I didn’t realize there was an issue. I’ll make sure to double-check the formatting more carefully next time.

Best,

–– User:KnowledgeMaple KnowledgeMaple (talk) 15:33, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ronen Plot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ronen Plot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. QwertyForest (talk) 09:11, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Please don’t delete this draft. The article is about Ronen Plot, who currently serves as the Acting Chairman of Yad Vashem. This draft is still being developed and will be expanded with reliable sources and human-reviewed content. I am working on improving it in line with Wikipedia’s policies. KnowledgeMaple (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)