Kkapidan

April 2025

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Kkapidan, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 11:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Jingiby (talk) 04:33, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to World War II in Yugoslav Macedonia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Tsarnushanov was collaborator with Bulgarian state during their occupation of Yugoslav Macedonia in the Second World War, etc.

Hello, I would like to make some remarks regarding this comment of yours. First, Yugoslav Macedonia did not exist during World War II, but was created after it in Communist Yugoslavia. Second, Bulgarian troops were welcomed there with flowers both in 1941 and in 1944 by the local population. Third, until the Bulgarian coup of September 9, 1944, in the so-called before the war Vardar Banovina, there was no serious resistance, except in the Albanian occupation zone. Fourth, until September 1944, half of the Bulgarian army and police there, was composed of local conscripts, who participated equally with his comrades of Bulgaria proper in all operations. Fifth, almost all the prominent builders of the post-war Macedonian Yugoslav republic, during the war or before it, declared themselves Bulgarians in one way or another, or were sympathetic to Bulgarians. Tsarnushanov was among the founders of the Macedonian Youth Secret Revolutionary Organization. He was Bulgarian teacher during WWII, as Gotse Delchev and Gyorche Petrov in Ottoman era, or Panko Brashnarov at the same time, for example. According to a Yugoslav census from 1966 on the casualties of the war, the ethnic Macedonian victim, It appears the number of ethnic Macedonian partisans killed from October 1941 to October 1944 in direct battles against Bulgarians is only several dozens. Indicative of the weak resistance for most of the war towards the Bulgarians, a case which is still a taboo topic in North Macedonia. According to Bogoljub Kočović the relative number of war losses was the lowest among the Macedonians, compared to all the other ethnic groups in Yugoslavia, incl. even the Hungarians. Jingiby (talk) 07:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, First, I refered to "Yugoslav Macedonia" because of the Wiki article. Second, yes they were, so were the Germans, since they were considered as liberators from the previous regime. Tsarnushanov himself later noted that the Bulgarian regime was no different from the previous Serbian, yet he continued to serve the regime. 3rd, 4th and 5th are not that relevant in this topic, since Tsarnushanov has claimed that Macedonians are Bulgarians, and actively denied the Macedonian ethnicity, claiming "Macedonism" is Serbianization of the Bulgarians. That is why I put an edit "Per Bulgarian historian Kosta Tsarnushanov...". Kkapidan (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Well, to clarify, I used Tsarnushanov's source in a way that does not require attribution. When someone makes claims without any basis, it is appropriate to label them as false claims. Tsarnushanov provided the primary sources and the evidence. We are not using him for his views about Macedonian ethnicity, but about the views of the Lozars themselves. That is why I told you to focus on the message too and not only the author. The primary sources of the Lozars, such as their magazine Loza, are freely available online and you read for yourself what their views were. StephenMacky1 (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Trifon Grekov

Primary sources can be both reliable and useful in certain situations, but must be used with caution in order to avoid original research. When editing articles in which the use of primary sources is a concern, in-line templates, such as {{primary source-inline}} and {{better source}}, or article templates, such as {{primary sources}} and {{refimprove science}}, may be used to mark areas of concern. Jingiby (talk) 04:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Razlovci uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herzegovina Uprising. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demographics of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 25 February 2026 (UTC)