Welcome!

edit
Hello, North of the Zambezi!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Maizen Sisters

edit

Hello, North of the Zambezi,

You tagged this article for deletion SECONDS after it was created. This is not done. You can't tag an article for deletion right after its creation, while the content creator is still working on it. And you only have 96 edits, you do not have enough editing experience to judge what articles should be deleted. Please stop patrolling articles and work on improving your editing skills, writing some articles or at least improving them rather than passing judgment on the work of other editors. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Looking over your contributions for the past two days, this is clearly not your first account. What were the previous account(s) that you used before this one? Please mention them on your User page before you get associated with a sockpuppet master. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
And then you tagged NoBull for deletion ONE MINUTE after it was created. If this behavior continues after this block is over, you can expect an indefinite block for a lack of competence. You are doing more damage than helping the project. Stop patrolling other editor's articles. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Liz Noted. I will slow down with the NPPing. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 06:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Having a conflict of interest is not prohibited

edit

Hi LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby, regarding the edit summary of Special:Diff/1158568711 and the edits around the Nadine George-Graves article, please do check the guideline again to see if it actually contains a prohibition on conflict of interest editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for low-quality patrolling. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kinopiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I promise to take a break from NPP and focus on reverting vandalism. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 22:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Indiscriminately reverting edits isn't much better than indiscriminately applying speedy tags. I think you need to slow down and perhaps try adding substantial content to articles instead of policing others' edits. Spicy (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kinopiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I promise to slow down, maybe try writing a draft or two. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 22:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Kinda in keeping with the below, I think it's best to let the block expire. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Creating an entire new article isn't a recommended task for beginners either, as they're unlikely to find a topic meeting the notability criteria that Wikipedia doesn't yet have an article about.
Expanding existing articles or fixing their spelling would be fine. After the 72 hours, that is, to ensure that "slowing down" isn't an empty promise. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
ToBeFree Good idea. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 22:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wikipedians who like Lu & the Bally Bunch has been nominated for discussion

edit

Category:Wikipedians who like Lu & the Bally Bunch has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby/userboxes/Lu

edit

User:LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby/userboxes/Lu, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby/userboxes/Lu and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby/userboxes/Lu during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2025

edit

You have been around here long enough to realise that your edit was disruptive.

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Full stop, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Major film studios

edit

In July 2024 you made this edit. Can you please tell me what is exactly wrong with the article? 2A02:1812:41D:B800:40C9:EB35:2EC:B500 (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations on your AFD nomination.

edit

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Copy to Meta

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Copy to Meta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * in solidarity 15:53, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Inactive member of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones

edit

Here I transferred you to the list of inactive members as you haven't edited within the realm of tropical cyclones for year.

If you become active again in the WikiProject you can revert my edit. Nibnab43637 (talk) 20:36, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

One-week self-requested block

edit

Done. I forgot to ask whether you also want talk page access removed. No need to do anything if you don't; if you do, reply here to say so and I can adjust the block. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Asilvering: I think I feel back up to editing now that the wikidrama seems to be reaching its conclusion. Kinopiko in solidarity with Esperanza 05:11, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, sorry. The point of a self-requested block is that it removes the choice from you - otherwise, it would be enough for you to simply take a self-enforced wikibreak. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Asilvering: Can the block be reduced to 12hrs, then? I feel like I was hasty to ask for a full week. Kinopiko in solidarity with Esperanza 05:32, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, sorry. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Asilvering: Okay, I'll wait. Kinopiko in solidarity with Esperanza 06:11, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply