KILLGOESE

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, KILLGOESE, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! QuicoleJR (talk) 20:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

November 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 23:22, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Don't remvee sourced content based on your misunderstanding of how anti-Semitic tropes are used.

And ... Your sandbox edits are looking a lot like trolling. Nick Fuentes? Acroterion (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

There is nothing in the image itself that has anything to do with Jewish government conspiracy theories. KILLGOESE (talk) 00:30, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your interpretation of the image doesn't take precedence over sourced analysis by subject matter experts in reliable sources. The article concern the image and its use in anti-Semitic propaganda. Acroterion (talk) 00:33, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, you can choose to include the section. But you have to edit it to say, "it's used in antisemitic media to promote jewish government conspiracy theories" not that the image itself does, which obviously doesn't make any sense. KILLGOESE (talk) 00:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Take your article improvement suggestions to the talkpage first. You might have a point, but your last edit made things less clear. Did you check what the reference said before you did that? You need to stay within the boundary of what's asserted by the reference, not your own idea of what's clearer. Acroterion (talk) 02:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

You still haven't explained what you're doing in your sandbox with the Fuentes business. And yes, I see the nonsense with the "gods" edits. Acroterion (talk) 02:47, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Im confused what's wrong with the sandbox page? Im obviously practicing how to edit wikipedia pages. Especially "List pages" like the list of US presidents. KILLGOESE (talk) 02:53, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

You don't see anything strange about including Nick Fuentes? Acroterion (talk) 03:06, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Why would we keep up a less accurate version of the article? Also i realised that is not even a proper source, there is no link. No source, random nonsense sentence, i think i'll remove the part. It also just appears randomly at the end, not connected to anything. KILLGOESE (talk) 02:56, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Not all sources are online - books are perfectly acceptable. So it's clear that you aren't taking references seriously. Acroterion (talk) 03:05, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

How am i supposed to fact check that reference? That seems like a very bad reference. There should at least be provided a screenshot of what specifically you are talking about. KILLGOESE (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

That’s why there are libraries.

Have you actually read MOS:US all the way through? It says not to change it in established articles without good reason. Acroterion (talk) 04:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I thought it meant english and canadain articles. so i only changed american ones. KILLGOESE (talk) 04:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Acroterion (talk) 03:05, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is KILLGOESE. Acroterion (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:KILLGOESE/sandbox

User:KILLGOESE/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KILLGOESE/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:KILLGOESE/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:11, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello

Hi Killgoese. I see that you're rather new here and I wanted to help you settle in.

I noticed that you were recently warned for being in an edit war. Remember, if someone constantly reverts, even if you think you're right, please do not constantly revert them. (With exceptions.) Instead, go to a talk page and seek consensus.

You're also in trouble with the community over your sandbox. You said it's for testing features, but I still think that you need to at least remove Nick Fuentes from there: otherwise, the entire sandbox will probably get deleted.

I understand that Wikipedia and conflicts with other users can get difficult sometimes. However, it may help to remember that most people are just here because they want to make the world a better place, even if not everyone agrees on how to get there.

If you need any sort of help or anything like that, don't hesitate to reach out. And when in doubt, it's best you ask before doing something.

Wikieditor662 (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

MOS:US edits

@KILLGOESE: Hello, and thank you for your contributions and help trying to enforce our Manual of Style. However, do note that MOS:US clearly states one should retain U.S. in American or Canadian English articles in which it is already established, so that means going around changing U.S. to US is not required and will unnecessarily clog watchlists. Anyway, you are mentioned over at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § KILLGOESE and it is highly recommended you respond to the concerns posted there. Again, thanks for being here, and if you need any help, feel free to ask me or at the Teahouse. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 12 hours for disuptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 04:54, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Why was i blocked? Someone told me to stop and i stopped? This seems a little unnecessary KILLGOESE (talk) 05:00, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

No you didn't, you kept editing even after Children will Listen sent you their warning on your page...

I'm actually trying to help you, as a more experienced editor, who has been here for a year and a half, trust me: being dishonest or getting defensive isn't going too help you. I would strongly urge that you take accountability for what you did, agree to not do this going forward, and follow through on that.

I and others would be glad to help you if that's what you decide to do, but we can't force you to act one way or another.

Wikieditor662 (talk) 05:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't real time. I was obviously editing, and then noticed the message, and stopped.

Im just factually saying what happened. KILLGOESE (talk) 05:09, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Even if that was the case, what you did was still wrong... you should almost always seek consensus before mass editing articles like this, especially if you're new here. Hence why I said in an earlier message I sent you when in doubt, it's best you ask before doing something.

And once again, as someone who's been here far longer than you, I would strongly urge you take my advice and that of others (even if you think you're right). I'd also suggest taking a look at WP:ELDERS.

Wikieditor662 (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Im confused why you're dragging this "far more experienced" thing, you've been here for a year and a half? That's nothing dude. What? Some people have been here for decades.

I am taking advice. I thought i was following the consensus. KILLGOESE (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

you've been here for a year and a half? That's nothing dude. What? Some people have been here for decades. What does that have to do with anything? And why are you saying a year and a half is "nothing" when you've only been here a week?

I am taking advice. I thought i was following the consensus. I've been genuinely been taking the time out of my day to try and help you not get blocked, and this is how you respond? In what way are you taking the advice? Wikieditor662 (talk) 05:55, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

why are you asking me? You're the one that brought it up. KILLGOESE (talk) 06:36, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Hi, blocks are only meant to prevent problems so we just need you to show that you understand why your edits were a problem. Can you please check out my reply here and try to answer my question?

That will really help to show admins that you won't make problem edits if you're unblocked. Blue Sonnet (talk) 05:05, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your username

Would you please explain how you arrived at your username? Acroterion (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I second this, @KILLGOESE, I'm very curious. What does "GOESE" mean? Wikieditor662 (talk) 16:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

"Kill goese" is an old Roblox user name, i just reused it here. KILLGOESE (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@KILLGOESE And does "GOESE" mean anything? Wikieditor662 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

no KILLGOESE (talk) 20:28, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Would you be open to changing your user name? Mikewem (talk) 22:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

why KILLGOESE (talk) 22:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Well, "GOESE" looks like it could mean gays or Jews (if you use a soft G), which then makes it seem like you're calling for genocide. Wikieditor662 (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, that's quite an imagination the person who came up with that has. KILLGOESE (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

It was multiple people actually. Are you sure that's not what you meant when you made your username? Wikieditor662 (talk) 22:35, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I made my username when i was like 10 years old. KILLGOESE (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

At this point, I think it might come across as a show of good faith that may do some work in getting this heat off of you. Is lessening the heat and scrutiny you are undergoing something that interests you in any way? Mikewem (talk) 22:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I might also ask, if the name means nothing, then is there some other reason why you would resist changing it? Mikewem (talk) 22:36, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Seems kind of like a "free speech issue" like someone is powertripping over some unrelated username. Constructing some bizzare way it might be offensive.

I would focus on mistakes i've actually made. Like the "U.S." issue, i now know not to do that. And i know to avoid edit wars. KILLGOESE (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I was just giving some unsolicited advice. Enjoy the heat. Mikewem (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

What heat? I thought this was the heat? KILLGOESE (talk) 22:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

No, they meant from the editors over at WP:ANI, who are now proposing that you get permanently blocked (meaning that you'll never be allowed to edit again). Mikewem was trying to help you avoid that, but it seems you don't want their help. Wikieditor662 (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Mikewam is the one that reported me.

What am i being blocked for? What rule did i violate?

I keep asking this but people just vaguely point to a list of rules without saying specifically which one.

This is giving major reddit mod power trip vibes. KILLGOESE (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Sorry? how can i revert this? KILLGOESE (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@KILLGOESE: The first thing you should do is change your username at Special:GlobalRenameRequest. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:27, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Can you say the reason why i change my user name KILLGOESE (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) You cannot revert this but you can appeal using the instructions above though I would advise you too look at peoples concerns on your username at the ANI thread and here as well as your editing conduct that you have already acknowledged. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 23:27, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok but serious question. I didn't realise Wikipedia was this "vibes based" i thought wikipedia was a rigid system of rules. So you just don't like the vibes of my username? Is that allowed? I want to be cooperative, i just don't understand the specific reason what's wrong with my username. KILLGOESE (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) The reasons were outlined to you before that the latter part your name could sound like gays or jews thats the concerns people have over your name. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 23:43, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok couldn't you say the same about your name "Gothic Golem" this just seems like a very bad precedent to set. A slippery slope. KILLGOESE (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I do not have kill in my name(nor does it sound like either of those in my view) but I have given my advice on your username and I do think changing it would help but it is up to you if you take it. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 23:52, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KILLGOESE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The block is not necessary, i already explained several times that i understood the mistakes i were making, every time i was making an edit, or making a mistake and someone explained it was wrong, i was improving in how to edit articles in the future. I was happily editing articles while i suddenly got the notification that i have been permanentally banned. I see this as entirely unnecessary, i can not come up with a single good reason this was done. Thank You for reading!KILLGOESE (talk) 23:30, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have been told, multiple times, about the issues with your editing and your username. The fact you continue to claim you have no idea why you were blocked and continue to request explanation means that either you honestly cannot understand what you have been told or are deliberately trolling - and, speaking frankly, at this point I'm inclined to believe it's the latter. Even if it isn't, though, it doesn't matter, as actions indistinguishable from X are X, and accordingly I am revoking your ability to edit your talk page. Further unblock requests can be made through WP:UTRS, although I would strongly advise not continuing there with the behavior you have shown here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:52, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.