Juno719
Welcome!
editHi Juno719! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tankishguy 21:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Large-scale table caption changes
editYou made a large number of edits where you replaced descriptive table captions with minimal ones and hid the captions using {{Screen reader-only}}, describing them as "redundant" and citing MOS:HEADER as justification. For example, replacing "Name of the award ceremony, year presented, award category, nominee(s) of the award, and the result of the nomination" with "List of awards and nominations", or replacing "List of studio albums, showing selected details, selected chart positions, sales figures and certifications" with "List of studio albums", and then hiding them. I do not see where the cited guideline states that descriptive table captions are redundant. In practice, captions of this type are widely used in Featured Lists and Featured Articles, which are considered the editorial gold standard and have passed formal review. If such captions were redundant, they would have been flagged and removed during Featured List and Featured Article reviews. I do see where MOS:HEADER applies in cases of genuine redundancy, for example where a table caption simply repeats the section heading, such as "Weekly chart performance for ABC" under a "Weekly chart" section, where trimming or omitting the caption is reasonable. I also could not find any prior discussion from your contributions proposing this change in practice, despite the edits being applied across many articles. As such, there does not appear to be an established consensus supporting the wholesale removal or suppression of these captions. Until there is consensus, large-scale stylistic changes of this kind are likely to be contested. — 🎄☃️ Paper9oll ☃️🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 15:27, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.