User talk:Jkaharper/2026/April
ITN recognition for Chan Santokhi
editOn 2 April 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chan Santokhi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 06:33, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Everett Lee
editHi!
I see that you are the one who created the post of Everett Lee. I would like to know where you came up with all that information on him? Would be interesting to know as he was my Dad!
All the best! / Erik Singer80 (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Louis Besson
editOn 4 April 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Louis Besson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 15:34, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on A. B. M. Anowarul Haque
edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page A. B. M. Anowarul Haque, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Albert Mazibuko
edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Albert Mazibuko, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Either/or edits
editHello, I notice that you edit on recent deaths. However, your edits seem to be "either/or", as in they are changing one perfectly normal way of writing things to another. On Nicolás Biglianti, there is nothing wrong with a paragraph starting "Biglianti later played...", just like there is nothing wrong with a paragraph starting "He later played...", but it's just not the way that I would start a paragraph. If I had written the wrong name or spelled it incorrectly, of course change it, but if it's just a matter of your preference I don't see the point in changing it.
Also "died aged" and "died at the age of" are another pair of either/or, "died aged" is used in a variety of publications. If this is atypical in another variety of English, then British English should be MOS:RETAINed if the first edition of the page was in British English. Unknown Temptation (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the message. I'll keep this short as I don't think this is vital, but I believe it's appropriate to begin the first sentence of a new section with the surname. Then to avoid repetition in following paragraphs, I change some to "he" or "she" at the start of every second paragraph so that the section isn't repetitive/robotic. Always what I've been taught. There's no fixed policy on that on here. As for "aged"/"at the age of", there is a Wiki direction on this. The former tends to be reserved for British English, but more so British subjects. The latter for all others. I prefer the latter as it builds the sentence out more and saves the paragraph looking too stubby. Thanks for your thoughts --Jkaharper (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
editHi, regarding this edit where you changed "[[Worcester, England]]"
to "[[Worcester, England|Worcester]], England"
, please see MOS:GEOLINK. Rift (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Rift:, I'm well aware of MOS:GEOLINK, and having re-read it I believe my edit to have been correct. My interpretation has always been that we do not link modern day country names in the infobox. On that page it says "Paris, France = incorrect" "Paris, France" = correct. Can you please tell me what part you're looking at? Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 11:27, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ned (snail)
editOn 25 April 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ned (snail), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)