Jhartman087

Nov 24

I sugsest you read wp:npov wp:v and wp:consensus as right now you are pushing against those. Slatersteven (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

February 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Neanderthal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 16:21, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

@Jhartman087 Please tell me why you did that. Note we also expect editors to add edit summaries, especially when they make such a major edit. Doug Weller talk 16:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Edit Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ozzy Osborne. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Augmented Seventh🎱 22:57, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

I am not in an edit war, i am restoring what people are removing. There is no reason to remove his filmography section. If anything they are vandalizing his page by removing his works Jhartman087 (talk) 23:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for responding.

I also think there needs to be a separate, sourced section detailing his entry into reality television, how it evolved over the decades, the other personalities involved.

On that section heading is the hatnote link to complete videography of the Ozzy Osborne . Which is where you put this content.

You seem to have significant interest in this aspect of his life: write it up, in sourced paragraphs, include it in career. Augmented Seventh🎱 02:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

The Osbournes Want to Believe moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Osbournes Want to Believe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Ok its all fixed. Please move out of draft Jhartman087 (talk) 03:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

If you are happy with the references added, then do feel free to click either the "Submit for Review" or the "Publish Now" button. I've converted one reference into a format that wikipedia editors expect. If you have the time then you can convert the rest too. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:31, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of The Osbournes Want to Believe for redirecting to Jack Osbourne

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Osbournes Want to Believe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to Jack Osbourne.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Osbournes Want to Believe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 00:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of The Osbournes Want to Believe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Osbournes Want to Believe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Osbournes Want to Believe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2026 (UTC)