Imtisig

Welcome!

Hi Imtisig! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Synorem (talk) 05:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello Imtisig, and thanks for your work.

Please remember to always include an edit summary for each edit, as explained at WP:CTW. Gderrin (talk) 09:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Sentence case

Thank you for your contributions! Moving forward, do note that in according with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style the titles of articles and headings used sentence case per WP:TITLECASE. See Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style for a jumpstart on common style conventions. The template {{circa}} is also generally favorable to presenting it manually, as it gives a dotted underline to the "c." that readers can hover over to see a tooltip of what it means. Keep up the good work! —Sirdog (talk) 06:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Zeal & Ardor edits

I noticed you changed the quote from Manuel in the Zeal & Ardor article from "don't give a shit about you" to "don't care about you". Please avoid doing this, as wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED and it is a direct quote. Later down you again changed the grammar of a direct quote. WP:QUOTE lays out the guidelines for quoted text, it should be verbatim from the source with no additional changes. RF23 (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank You for notifying me. I will take care next time. Imtisig (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious and you've clearly been making semi-automated grammatical edits, parts of which have been disruptive. Graham87 (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imtisig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello! Since I believe my block was a mistake, I request the unblock for my account. But in case it's related to the warning from the other fellow editor regarding the direct quote editing, I took that lesson right away as I received the message to which I then replied. As the reason for my block, an abuse of editing privileges stated. I've looked into what is meant by this category and what was listed there made me think that this's a mistake. Imtisig (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request. Act II

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imtisig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello again. I apologize for applying in an improper way the first time. I can assure that I won't be committing disruptive/semi-automated edits further. As of now, there are 7 reverts out of 400 edits on record but I'll strive to never let the reverts number rise. I want to make significant contributions to Wikipedia and plan to publish notable articles related to art, history, culture, etc. Imtisig (talk) 13:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

Apologies as this is very late, but I've unblocked your account, given that you've accepted responsibility for your previous semi-automated edits and agreed not to repeat them again. Please let me know if you have any questions about editing :) Elli (talk | contribs) 05:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

October 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Serial ATA International Organization when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:11, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to Philip Moriarty seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 15:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to James Bernard (composer) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Note you have done this on a number of pages. Please be more careful. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:33, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Juan José Origel when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:16, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Deimantė Cornette

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Deimantė Cornette, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:51, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2025

Please do not use large language models to generate AfD !votes, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panderoza. The guideline WP:NHOSPITALITY does not even exist. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:22, 4 April 2026 (UTC)