Welcome!

edit

Hello, Ilovebread7271, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as HIDE & SEEK 3, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dan arndt (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of HIDE & SEEK 3

edit
Notice

The article HIDE & SEEK 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM, lacks any sources or references.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Dan arndt (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of HIDE & SEEK 3 for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HIDE & SEEK 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HIDE & SEEK 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

HIDE & SEEK 3 result

edit

I have made your page into a draft, due to the draft-like nature of your page and due to the fact your page has no sources and in the references section you stated “sources will be added on the 13-14 January” which indicates the page is better to be a draft and so you can incubate the page and submit it for review at a latter stage, I shall put the submit for review template which you can use later. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know! Are Fandom Wiki sources ok as well? There are other sources I will use, but I just wanted to know if this is ok. Also, how long does a submission request take? Thanks! I'll update and submit the draft. Ilovebread7271 (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fandom wikis can be edited by whoever and so Wikipedia does not find it a reliable source, however a newspaper or film critic website would count.
A submission can take anywhere from 2-3 weeks if not longer, it’s a bit of a gamble. If you need help or assistance you can ask at the Teahouse. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 08:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: HIDE & SEEK 3 (January 14)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't meet WP:NFF yet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Nil🥝 04:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ilovebread7271! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 04:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
Hello, Ilovebread7271. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Ilovebread7271. Thank you for your work on 2026 Verizon outage. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is a list of references, however no inline citations. Information needs to be verifiable. Please move the sources to their correct place in the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Currently (since I'm a new creator), I don't know how to add inline citations, which is why I want to add it to the Teahouse. However, I can assure that my citations are verifiable. Ilovebread7271 (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can you provide more links, please? Not a single one you put on the page is real. ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Forgot to truly notify you @Ilovebread7271 ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 2026 Verizon outage

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2026 Verizon outage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. feedmepaperr (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hello Ilovebread7271! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Make Edits to an Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hello Ilovebread7271! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Teahouse Unanswered Questions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

HIDE & SEEK 3 moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to HIDE & SEEK 3. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  Quinn (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

March 2026

edit
Information icon

Hello Ilovebread7271. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ilovebread7271. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ilovebread7271|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  Quinn (talk) 03:09, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:HIDE & SEEK 3

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:HIDE & SEEK 3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Quinn (talk) 03:19, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply