Hissamelriys

Appeal for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hissamelriys (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for violating WP:PAID and I apologies again for it. I have read it and I will not violate any Wikipedia guidelines. I will comply with WP:PAID if I ever get compensated for my edits in any way which is extremely unlikely because I will not make any editing for anyone or in exchange of anything from onwards. Please be kind enough to give me a second chance to allow me to contribute to Wikipedia in constructive way. Hissamelriys (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I fear you have burned your bridges here already. Our interest is in what benefits the encyclopedia, and I can see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking your account; trust is a vital commodity on Wikipedia, and you have already shown that we cannot trust you. Put bluntly - and I apologise if this offends - I simply am not convinced that you are here to help build an encyclopedia rather than to benefit yourself. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:FileZigZag

Hello, Hissamelriys. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FileZigZag".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FAXPLUS

The article FAXPLUS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the service is notable, the pcworld, lifehacker source mention do not recommend this service. No other reputable source exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Faxplus-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Faxplus-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mobirise

The article Mobirise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

created by a blocked suspected violator; A7: fails N:CORP

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Roobee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roobee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roobee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

KH-1 (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)