HenriPurwanto

Welcome!

Hello, HenriPurwanto!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and reach a consensus there before restoring the edit.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source. Do not use AI-generated text.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Timtrent, thank you very much for the warm welcome and useful guidance! 🙏

I am very happy to join and contribute to preserve our cultural heritage. I will read and learn the guidelines well. Thank you very much and happy editing! HenriPurwanto (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (April 29)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, I am bad at usernames, left the following feedback:

This draft does not include any sources or inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. You should also use inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

• quotations;
• any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
• any material about living people.

Learn how to create inline citations in the:

• Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
• VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kidung Lakbok to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 02:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thank you very much for the feedback and guidance. 🙏

I have now added reliable references including published books, official government website, and legal documentation (Copyright Certificate from Ministry of Law and Human Rights of Indonesia).

I hope this meets all the requirements. Please kindly review again. Thank you very much! HenriPurwanto (talk) 17:43, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, HenriPurwanto! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 02:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (April 29)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kidung Lakbok to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Dan arndt, thank you very much for the feedback and review. 🙏

I have now updated the draft by adding reliable references including published books, official government website, and legal documentation (Copyright Certificate from Ministry of Law and Human Rights of Indonesia).

I have also ensured the sources are independent and meet the requirements. Please kindly review again. Thank you very much! HenriPurwanto (talk) 17:41, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (April 29)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft does not include any sources or inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. You should also use inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

• quotations;
• any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
• any material about living people.

Learn how to create inline citations in the:

• Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
• VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

One last go at this, please read the advice already given: we need sources, reliable sources, to demonstrate notability. Just putting your own summary and pointing to Wikisource is not sufficient, otherwise it's just an essay. See WP:NBOOK and use WP:REFB - this needs to be a summary of independent sources.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kidung Lakbok to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the feedback and guidance, @Timtrent and @ChrysGalley. 🙏

I have now added reliable references including published books, official government website, and legal documentation (Copyright Certificate from Ministry of Law and Human Rights of Indonesia).

I have also removed any circular references to Wikipedia itself. I hope this meets the requirements. Please kindly review again. Thank you very much! HenriPurwanto (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (April 29)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Despite numerous exhortations to provide citations you have failed to do so. You have also attempted to use Wikipedia as a reference. Wikipedia may never be used as a reference. Please use Wikilinks instead. See WP:CIRCULAR. Those faux references must be replaced. At least you have some sort of referencing now. Because you have done this I have not rejected this draft. Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE and use what you learn there. Not doing so will lead to rejection.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Kidung Lakbok to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (April 29)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

You have not availed yourself of WP:CITE nor WP:REFB. I warned you that this would lead to rejection. Reviewers will not guide you for ever, especially when ignored. This stops now

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:15, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the feedback and correction, Sir.

I understand the requirements. I will study the rules (WP:CITE and WP:REFB) and I will fix the references properly according to the standards. I will complete it soon.

Thank you for your guidance. 🙏 HenriPurwanto (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Kidung Lakbok seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. --Gurkubondinn 19:25, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Gurkubondinn, thank you for the notice.

Actually, I have fixed all the formats and references properly now. I wrote and edited everything manually by myself, not using AI. I understand the content very well because I have been documenting this history since 2013 and I hold the original book manuscript.

Please check the current version again. Thank you very much for your guidance. 🙏 HenriPurwanto (talk) 01:11, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Using AI on English Wikipedia, regardless of if you understand the content or not. The problem is not about what the AI generated or if it had problems or not. The problem is that you used AI at all. --Gurkubondinn 01:39, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

@HenriPurwanto: why did you move the draft into article space after it was rejected by @Timtrent? Did you discuss and address their concerns anywhere? --Gurkubondinn 01:46, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Gurkubondinn,

Thank you for the clarification. I understand now that using AI is not allowed at all. I assure you that from now on I will write everything 100% manually by myself without any assistance.

Regarding moving the page, I did it because I have fixed all the references and formats according to the standards (WP:CITE and WP:REFB). I believe the article now meets the requirements. I apologize if I did not ask permission first, I just wanted to improve and publish the history properly.

Thank you very much for your guidance. 🙏 HenriPurwanto (talk) 01:57, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I assure you that from now on I will write everything 100% manually by myself without any assistance.[emphasis added]

But in your previous reply, less than hour ago, you said that you wrote and edited everything manually myself, not using AI. Was that not truthful? --Gurkubondinn 02:11, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Draft:Kidung Lakbok. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:12, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Kidung Lakbok moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kidung Lakbok. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has WP:V problems that have not been addressed since AfC. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Gurkubondinn 01:58, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Note for other editors: this was an IAR draftification (article has an {{under construction}} tag). There was a CIRCULAR reference to the editor themselves on commons (and I'm also not sure about the veracity of the copyright status or license selected), 1x 404 reference and 1x reference that does not load (for me). The draft was rejected by another editor at AfC before it was unilaterally moved into article space. The editor has had problems with WP:V (and likely been using AI) since AfC and has not listened to feedback. --Gurkubondinn 02:04, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (May 2)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

This is wholly AI generated. An entirely new draft is required, written in 100% human words. Thus I have rejected this draft. It will not proceed further.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:11, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kidung Lakbok (May 3)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Rejected means stop. Do not resubmit. Your article will not be considered for inclusion. Continuing to try to manually resubmit your article after rejection will just result in your editing privileges being curtailed.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Athanelar (talk) 15:10, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is HenriPurwanto; AI usage CIR. Athanelar (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Kidung Lakbok

Draft:Kidung Lakbok, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kidung Lakbok and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kidung Lakbok during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:24, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for AI misuse.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:01, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from posting comments generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia talk pages, such as those you posted to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kidung Lakbok. Your comments have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 23:00, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

@Chaotic Enby courtesy ping 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 23:01, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the courtesy ping. HenriPurwanto, please see this as a final warning. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)