Helsinkiiiiiiii
November 2025
editWelcome to Wikipedia. You're changing various words in Personal relationships of Elvis Presley to synonyms that make less sense. Please stop. • a frantic turtle 🐢 14:39, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- understand your concerns and appreciate your feedback." Follow t: "However, I would like to discuss why I think it's important to continue in the current direction…". : "Perhaps we can find a mutually agreement. I know to some people it doesn’t make sense but they can look up the words on google what they mean and people now know a new word. It’s making Wikipedia spectators more intelligent and intrested. Helsinkiiiiiiii (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Also you don’t have to care about it just don’t read it Damn making a big deal out of nothing. Helsinkiiiiiiii (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Be kind buddy Helsinkiiiiiiii (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Stop changing my edits you didn’t make them and that does not gig you a right change them like you know hat preeminent means you idiotic narcissistic Helsinkiiiiiiii (talk) 14:56, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Be kind buddy Helsinkiiiiiiii (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Also you don’t have to care about it just don’t read it Damn making a big deal out of nothing. Helsinkiiiiiiii (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Personal relationships of Elvis Presley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. • a frantic turtle 🐢 14:58, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
May 2026
edit
Hello, I'm Njd-de. An edit that you recently made to Thomas B. Brush seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. – NJD-DE (talk) 23:20, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Please stop creating new articles by using a large language model and without any sources. Please have a look at Help:Your first article. – NJD-DE (talk) 23:54, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Thomas B. Brush moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Thomas B. Brush. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Mike Seminary moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Mike Seminary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Edward N. Waldvogel moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Edward N. Waldvogel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 00:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Louis Schwab moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Louis Schwab. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 00:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Albert D. Cash moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Albert D. Cash, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2026 (UTC)