Hellenyck
Please contact me via my German discussion page.
Friedrich Stigler moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Friedrich Stigler. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SatnaamIN (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- The call to expand the bibliography in this case does not appear methodologically convincing. Hartmut H. Kunstmann has conducted a thorough analysis of the trial records, thereby establishing the empirical foundation. Wolfgang Behringer, on the other hand, has situated the figure within a broader interpretive framework. Beyond these contributions, the person in question is indeed mentioned in numerous publications; these references are incidental and do not contribute to further developing or refining Kunstmann’s findings.
- Against this backdrop, the mere accumulation of additional titles for the sake of quantity lacks scientific purpose. What matters is not the breadth of the citations, but the relevance and analytical weight of the literature consulted. 𓊝 06:53, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
edit
Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sanctuary of Isis and the Magna Mater, Mainz. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- That's nonsense. It’s true that I'm not a native speaker. However, this isn’t a translation by a generative AI. 𓊝 14:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Then what is it? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- I’m just using the English I learned in school. It’s not bad, but orthography is sometimes a problem. It may be that some of my sentences sound a bit like German sentences in English. This goes especially for their lengt. All of the cited references have been consulted and reviewed. This article is the author’s own work. I have digitized the works I used as part of the project, so I am now theoretically able to provide proof upon request that they were indeed used. I’m not entirely sure where the idea came from that the text was written by an LLM. Is it because of the quotation marks? 𓊝 14:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- No - neither the quotation marks nor German sentence structure. I'll ask you a more specific question next, but right now I’m wondering why you're talking about yourself in the third person? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:57, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- As I said, I’m not a native speaker. I’m sorry if my expression sounds awkward, inorganic, or imprecise. 𓊝 17:16, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Would you like to continue discussing this matter? 𓊝 13:59, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- No - neither the quotation marks nor German sentence structure. I'll ask you a more specific question next, but right now I’m wondering why you're talking about yourself in the third person? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:57, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- I’m just using the English I learned in school. It’s not bad, but orthography is sometimes a problem. It may be that some of my sentences sound a bit like German sentences in English. This goes especially for their lengt. All of the cited references have been consulted and reviewed. This article is the author’s own work. I have digitized the works I used as part of the project, so I am now theoretically able to provide proof upon request that they were indeed used. I’m not entirely sure where the idea came from that the text was written by an LLM. Is it because of the quotation marks? 𓊝 14:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Then what is it? --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)