Your submission at Articles for creation: Tariq Masood (May 2)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jannatulbaqi were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Baqi:) (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hassan111222! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Baqi:) (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

May 2025

edit

Information icon Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to Islam in Pakistan, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Leafy46 (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Islam in Pakistan

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Islam in Pakistan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Saraiki language

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Saraiki language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

January 2026

edit

Information icon Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Deobandi movement. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 19:20, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026

edit

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hasan ibn Ali, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply