HCPcomputing

Your submission at Articles for creation: SoftQuantus (January 12)

2=50px

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CabinetCavers were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The submission appears to be written in Brazilian Portuguese. This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may be able to find a version of Wikipedia in your language at the Wikipedia home page and write the article there.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SoftQuantus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CabinetCavers ^{(thou shalt speaketh)} 12:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the review.

To better address the comment “No sources”, could you please clarify which specific statements or sections require sourcing (e.g., company history, product description, benchmarks), and the type of sources expected (independent secondary coverage versus factual registry sources)?

This will help me revise the draft in line with Wikipedia’s policies before resubmitting. HCPcomputing (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

You need sources to establish notablility. Also, the draft was speedy deleted as an ad. CabinetCavers ^{(thou shalt speaketh)} 15:10, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, HCPcomputing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CabinetCavers (thou shalt speaketh) 12:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SoftQuantus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SoftQuantus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Quinn ΘΔ 13:13, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I contest this speedy deletion.

This draft was created in good faith as an Articles for Creation submission and is currently being rewritten to address Wikipedia policies. I acknowledge that the current version does not yet meet notability and tone requirements.

I am actively removing promotional language, reducing product detail, and restructuring the draft toward a neutral, encyclopedic description while seeking appropriate independent secondary sources. This page is not intended as advertising, and I respectfully request that it not be deleted under G11 while these policy-aligned changes are in progress.

Thank you for your consideration. HCPcomputing (talk) 13:17, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Block notice

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit.

Deb (talk) 13:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HCPcomputing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

HCPcomputing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked because it was used in a way that appeared promotional and because my previous username gave the impression of representing an organization, which is against Wikipedia’s purpose and username policy.

I disclose that I am associated with SoftQuantus innovative OÜ. I do not receive compensation specifically for editing Wikipedia, but I acknowledge that my past edits related to that organization constituted a conflict of interest and created the appearance of paid or promotional contributions.

I understand the reason for my block and I will not repeat the behavior that led to it. If unblocked, I will not edit articles related to SoftQuantus or to any organization, project, or product with which I am affiliated.

If unblocked, I intend to make neutral and constructive contributions unrelated to my professional activities, such as copyediting, improving clarity and grammar, adding citations to existing articles, and contributing to general topics in computing and technology where I have no conflict of interest.

I am requesting a username change to remove any impression of organizational representation and to fully comply with Wikipedia’s username policy. HCPcomputing (talk) 13:39, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:33, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) What is your exact affiliation with SoftQuantas? If you are employed by them, then you are a paid editor. It would not matter whether or not you are being paid specifically to edit Wikipedia; your employment by itself would trigger the requirement for disclosure. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

You haven't chosen a new username. Please do so and update the unblock template accordingly. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2026 (UTC)