Grizfan37

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hurricane Wind and Fire were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Flicker is not a reliable source because anyone can upload an image and description with information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Grizfan37/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:41, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Grizfan37! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:41, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Grizfan37! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Can I ban Hurricane wind and Fire, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Choteau, Montana

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Choteau, Montana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

At the bare minimum, you need to be using a spellcheck. Punctuation goes before citations, and Wikipedia uses sentence case in things like section headers. Your edits are missing words and have incorrect verb tense ("and majority of the streets sank in or become damaged"). When every sentence you submit contains errors, you need to clean the issues up yourself, rather than asking others to do this for you.

Please read the MOS before contributing further, and practice in your sandbox. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I never asked anybody to so it. Maybe you need to check for errors karen Grizfan37 (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Choteau, Montana, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Fairfield, Montana appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Grizfan it is not a good idea to re-add Barta to the Fairfield article. The policy Jessica linked here says a person should already have an article before being added to the notable people list. I asked on her talkpage because I missed this thread. It is always better to ask rather than put something back that someone has deleted, especially when it is an experienced editor.--Tbennert (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bynum Reservoir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bynum Reservoir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freezout Lake (March 29)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, PeriodicEditor, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.

• To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Freezout Lake. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
• If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Freezout Lake to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

PeriodicEditor (talk) 07:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Eureka Reservoir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eureka Reservoir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Pishkun Reservoir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pishkun Reservoir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Great Falls 2026 4.2 Earthquake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Great Falls 2026 4.2 Earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Falls 2026 4.2 Earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Scoria (talk) 00:37, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

List of rivers and streams in Teton County, Montana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of rivers and streams in Teton County, Montana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Collins, Montana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Collins, Montana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and an unincorporated community is required to pass WP:GNG, this source needs significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Although I greaty appreciate your editing, you just do not understand. This is a very small area, and little reliable sources. If you can, please restore the article Grizfan37 (talk) 01:14, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Farmington, Montana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Farmington, Montana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I would llike to thank you for your editing, but unfortunately due to the relatively small size of the areea, little accurate sources are available, and this was the only one I could find. So, please move it back. Thank you Grizfan37 (talk) 18:26, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bowman's Corner

The article Bowman's Corner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Imzadi 1979 → 23:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Bowman's Corner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bowman's Corner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowman's Corner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Imzadi 1979 → 03:05, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Idk why everyone is hating on me. This article has enough sources, and most of this information is common knowledge. Take it off deletion Grizfan37 (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

You'll need to comment at the AfD nomination. No one is "hating on [you]", rather we are of the opinion that the topic doesn't warrant inclusion in the encyclopedia. Imzadi 1979 → 00:17, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flat Creek, Montana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flat Creek, Montana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse.

Minnastronomer (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Flat Creek Article

Let's run through the events from my perspective.

Yesterday, I was patrolling some newly created articles. I found one about a creek in Montana called Flat Creek. At first glance it had some formatting errors, which I began to work on and fix. However, the longer I read it, the more issues it had. Citations were odd and and language showed signs of LLM writing styles. I believed the article was, at least in part, using LLM generated content. I stated my reasoning, and marked the page for speedy deletion. It was deleted shortly after by another editor, Dr vulpes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I link him here because I believe he should be at least informed that this conversation is taking place. You did not respond to the deletion nomination for multiple hours, at which point the article had already been deleted. You then left a message on my talk page. The beginning of the message is reasonable, being upset that you were not given a chance to contest the deletion. However, you then delivered an ultimatum that either I restore the page (something not in my power to do) or "I will ruin your user talk page, and no one will trust you."

I'm willing to talk, even admit I made an error in marking the page for speedy deletion, but threats of harassment are quite intolerable. You cannot call for my maturity while displaying so little yourself. I understand that you are upset, I had some articles deleted in my early days on Wikipedia.

Let's resolve this and hopefully get on good terms. Minnastronomer (talk) 10:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello again. I would first like to apologize for my mean and somewhat rude threats to you and your talk page. I really was just frustrated still when writing and I really shouldn't have wrote all.of those things. Right now, I would like to come to a peaceful end of this conflict. I was wondering if you still have like the version history of my article, and if can send it to me via email or just on my talk page. If you can't please reach back out to me regarding of others ways to recover the article, because I do not want to restart which I have already had to do many times on that article due to a computer glitch. If I could receive the article back, I would wish to improve the details of the citation and fix any formatting or spelling errors. Again, I am incredibly sorry for those rude words. As a human, I often make mistakes, especially while frustrated, and I do hope you forgive me. If you are able to recover the article in some way, send me a message via talk page or email with the whole article pasted. If you can't, I hope you and Dr. Vulpes will join me in a conversation in how to retrieve it, as I really do not want to restart on the article. Thank you

Sincerely,

Grizfan37 Grizfan37 (talk) 22:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate that. Head over to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion and you should be able to make a case for your article. I don't have the power to restore your article but Admins do. Minnastronomer (talk) 01:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the info..I will update you if I am successful or not. Grizfan37 (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

With the article restored, I'm going to try doing some of the cleanup work it needs. I've just fixed some wordings and spellings so far. I think it could be in mainspace shape in a few days. If you could add some more content and sources too that would go a long ways to improving it. Minnastronomer (talk) 11:01, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for what you're doing. As this is a somewhat small and rural topic, I will do.my best to find sources Grizfan37 (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

I recently did some editing work on the article. I mainly fixed the sources, but I also rephrased some things as well. If you could look at it and tell me what I could imrpove on it, or if its god move it to the article space that would be great. Thanks.

@Grizfan37 Grizfan37 (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

I've done some more cleanup, you've improved substantially. There are a few things I think should be clarified before publishing. First, you say the creek offers 'recreational opportunities'. You specify fishing, but elaboration (ideally with sources) on what these recreational opportunities actually are would be good. Secondly, you mention in the 'Uses' section the 'Dearborn Canal and Water Company'. It is currently unclear in the wording if 'Dearborn Canal' and 'Water Company' are separate or if 'Dearborn Canal and Water Company' is the name of a company. Lastly, you mentioned Simms, Montana in the 'See also' section but it doesn't seem to be related. If Flat Creek flows through the town, then that should be mentioned in the 'Flow Course' section.

Once those are addressed, I'm willing to advocate for the article being put back into mainspace. Minnastronomer (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips. Grizfan37 (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Flat Creek, Montana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Flat Creek, Montana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Requires copyediting and minor updates. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

@Grizfan37 if you run into any problems or roadblocks working on your article just ping me or leave a note on my talk page and I'll try to help you the best I can. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:58, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Grizfan37 (talk) 23:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fairfield, Montana

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fairfield, Montana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:12, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sun River Game Range

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sun River Game Range, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Elk Creek Montana

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Elk Creek Montana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:11, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Cataract Falls (Montana) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cataract Falls (Montana). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Memorial Falls Montana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Memorial Falls Montana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to thank you for your editing and improvement suggestions, but I personally thought it had plenty of sources. Do you think you could relook at it or tell me what you thought about the sources. Thanks @Grizfan37 Grizfan37 (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello. The sources were either not reliable enough (Great Falls Montana Tourism, Substack) or did not discuss the subject in-depth. JTtheOG (talk) 19:41, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Also, why do you end these articles with "Montana"? Are they really called "Memorial Falls Montana" and "Nilan Reservoir Montana"? JTtheOG (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

The Montana is because there are other locations with the same name. Alsoo, most of those sources are reliable, and that Great Falls one is made by the city governmment website and others are not a blog and do indeed discuss the subject Grizfan37 (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nilan Reservoir Montana

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nilan Reservoir Montana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Montana Highway 435

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Montana Highway 435, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:18, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cataract Falls (Montana) has been accepted

Cataract Falls (Montana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 23:49, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm Alith Anar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fairfield, Montana, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alith Anar 00:24, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fairfield, Montana, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Alith Anar 00:26, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

I am working to resolve this. Also, I noticd that you removed the section "In the News" section due to some sort of rule, but the Choteau Montana page has a section with the exact same name. Can you explain why Fairfield's got deleted by Choteau's is still up. Grizfan37 (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your response! The reason why Choteau's "In the News" section is still up is simply because it hasn't been removed yet, and even then WP:OCON applies here: just because one article has something doesn't mean another shouldn't, because that thing maybe a mistake or against consensus or so forth. Furthermore, WP:USCITIES is the guideline for the layout for United States settlement articles; in the case of Choteau's "In the News" section, all of the content in that section could more reasonably go in the History section instead, since it details events that happened at least two decades ago (and even then, a lot of it is celebrity gossip that is only tangentially relevant to Choteau). Alith Anar 00:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok thank you. Grizfan37 (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to River's Edge Trail when you modified the page, you introduced conversion errors. The {{convert}} template can be complex and I encourage you to read its documentation but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it and when conversion errors are present they will show up in red. It is strongly recommended that you always use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:46, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

thank you Grizfan37 (talk) 03:04, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Memorial Falls (Montana) (May 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Seems to meet WP:NATFEAT but References 3 and 9 are unreliable because Substack is user-generated with no editorial oversight.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Memorial Falls (Montana) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:00, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flat Creek, Montana (May 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for geographic features. The draft requires either:

• evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for geographic features;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine directory listings;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, tourism boards, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Flat Creek, Montana to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:18, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Little Prickly Pear Creek

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Little Prickly Pear Creek, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:27, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedrunning content

@Grizfan37: I have reverted your edit in the Scientology article for the second time. My prior revert of your insertion of the same content (about Scientology speedrunning) referenced in my edit summary the policies which apply to my reasoning: "Removed content about a recent fad which is WP:UNDUE for this top-level WP:SUMMARY article."

The Scientology article is the top-level article for a whole hierarchy of daughter-articles, and is intended to be a brief summary covering most of the major topics. The speedrunning period is (was?) a short term fad. It is undue weight to mention it in the top-level article. It might be better suited in one of the other "daughter" articles where details are more relevant. Please do not continue to try to add it to the Scientology article.

Note that we recently executed a massive reorganization and trimming of the Scientology article, and are not keen on repeating the work. Per WP:ONUS, "the responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on editors seeking to include disputed content".

Lastly, "moved wording" is not an appropriate edit summary for the addition of content. Please read WP:EDITSUMMARY for more information.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:01, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I was confused on your wording and did not know what you meant. Grizfan37 (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Fairfield-Choteau rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fairfield-Choteau rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairfield-Choteau rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Tbennert (talk) 00:13, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please review your changes before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts.

• In the Source (wikitext) editor, review your changes by pressing the Show preview button below the edit box (left image);
• In the Visual Editor, click the 'Review your changes' link in the Save dialog box (right):

This will show you what the page would look like with your changes, so you can make any needed refinements before actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you do this before saving. If you have any questions, please contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:36, 18 June 2026 (UTC)