Greek1979

BLP and Gabriel

The sources you are using cannot be used in a biography of a living person. Please carefully read and understand WP:BLP. Do not reinsert this material without first gaining consensus on the talk page. --Leivick (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

NPOV, SOAP

Hi Greek1979, I noticed your edits towards the Syrian Social Nationalist Party removed quite a lot of reliably sourced content and added a lot of content that was not only unsourced, but specifically labelled to seek consensus on the talk page to change that section. It's abundantly clear to me that you are much more interested in providing a sympathetic characterisation of the party. Wikipedia is not your WP:SOAP, and it certainly isn't welcoming WP:NONAZIS. 69.157.0.113 (talk) 11:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, the removed "sourced" material was sourced to militant blogs, in blatant contradiction to the consensus on the talk page. I simply removed WP:SOAP elements in order to reflect that consensus. Your argument is circular, and since you obviously haven't read the page you linked to in order to virtue signal, here are its contencts for you:

Nazi beliefs:

The core beliefs uniting various types of Nazis and white supremacists are:

That white people are more intelligent than non-whites.

That white people are more industrious than non-whites.

That white people are more physically adept or attractive than non-whites.

That white people are morally and ethically superior to non-whites.

That the various cultures of white people are better than the cultures of non-white people.

That white people have the right to live in a white-only nation.

That in majority-white countries a large majority of crimes are committed by non-whites due to genetic factors.

That violent, abhorrent or deceptive actions are justified in the pursuit of these beliefs.

In addition, there are many more beliefs that are quite common, though not universal among these groups. These include:

That Jews present an existential threat.

That there exists a massive or even global conspiracy to enrich Jews at the expense of others.

That white people are being systemically killed, out-bred and otherwise forced into a minority status.

That Jews are the true perpetrators of Nazism, or hold an ideology that is worse or morally equivalent.

That minority groups are seeking to destroy Western culture.

That the Holocaust never happened, was greatly exaggerated, or that historians have inflated the death toll.

That the Holocaust was morally justified (or, if they deny it, that it should have happened).

That the groups persecuted by the Nazis brought it upon themselves, and that the Nazis merely acted in self-defence.

That the wrong side won in World War II (or, the wrong side won the Great Patriotic War).

That Adolf Hitler was a great leader for the German people, despite (or even because of) Nazi Germany's innumerable atrocities.

That non-whites hold back white progress.

That non-whites intend to kill whites.

That non-whites should be slaves.

That white people are more oppressed than other groups.

That non-whites shouldn't have basic human rights.

That Islam or Muslims are the overwhelming source of terrorism.

That groups of people should be wiped off the face of the planet, or systematically "repatriated" to the lands or continents they supposedly originated from.

That Jews are responsible for the creation of communism and/or capitalism.

That the concept of free speech entails the freedom to post or write race-, gender-, or identity-based slurs, insults, or the promotion and glorification of hate and violence, without any consequence whatsoever, and that any consequence brought upon them is an act of censorship.

That the Globalists are plotting to destroy Western civilization.

That there exists a Jewish or "elite" cabal as purported in any of a variety of implausible conspiracy theories, such as QAnon, the New World Order, the white genocide, or the Great Replacement.

That the human population has an overall genetic quality which can be improved through selective breeding, often targeting individuals considered undesirable for sterilization or elimination.

That disabled individuals or those with mental health issues should be forcibly sterilized or killed, as part of a so-called "euthanasia" program.

These beliefs are – without exception – either demonstrably false, completely unsupported by evidence, or totally unfalsifiable. The very existence of a "white race" is a pseudo-scientific idea that has been rejected by the scientific community since the late 1960s – shortly after the discovery of molecular genetics. See Race (human categorization) § Modern scholarship for more on this. Debunking these beliefs is not the purpose of this essay, so they are not addressed here. Suffice it to say that all of these beliefs are considered false or meaningless by experts in the relevant fields. One can verify this with any sufficiently in-depth encyclopedia. There happens to be one close at hand.

None of these unacceptable beliefs are being supported here, so your argument doesn't work, and your proposed edits are akin to vandalism. A party which explicitly rejects racism in all its forms cannot be made to fit your partisan worldview, and simply saying pointing this out is not "support for racism". Greek1979 (talk) 12:46, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Except it doesn't reject racism in all its forms, it's had extensive ties with neo-Nazi movements for decades, up to today, which you would know if you were an expert on regional politics like you say you are. You removed reliably sourced information to argue a Nazi party isn't antisemitic, and making nonspecific allegations of sources being "militant blogs" (lol) doesn't justify it. 69.157.0.113 (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)