Gottagitgud
| This is Gottagitgud's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Expulsion of Mormons from Jackson County, Missouri (November 5)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Expulsion of Mormons from Jackson County, Missouri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Gottagitgud!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Expulsion of Mormons from Jackson County, Missouri has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Pbritti (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for July 3
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1838 Mormon War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caldwell County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1838 Mormon War
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1838 Mormon War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Penultimate supper -- Penultimate supper (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Penultimate supper. Thank you for taking the time to review my nomination! This is an article with a rich history going back to 2004, and I am eager to collaborate with you and find ways it can be improved. Best regards. Gottagitgud (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Gottagitgud: Hi! I've dived in a bit already, apologies it's taking me a bit longer to get initial comments to you than I thought, I have unexpected family visitors so my life got a bit more chaotic than expected. I'm working on reviewing citations at the minute and should have some initial comments of the article as well as a thorough citation review for you soon. It's a lovely article so far! — penultimate_supper 🚀 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi;
User:Gottagitgud, would you like me to extend the hold on Talk:1838 Mormon War/GA1? I see you've been working in-depth on the article in a userspace draft—making some significant improvements—so I don't doubt the article will readily meet all the GA criteria soon. I'm happy to extend the hold for a while (maybe till 2024-12-16?) to support that work. Also, please communicate if there are any issues I raised or suggestions I made that you don't agree with; I'm just one reviewer and unless something is a major violation of the criteria, reasonable editors can have different views about what will lead to the strongest article—which is all that really matters in the end. Cheers! — penultimate_supper 🚀 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1838 Mormon War
editThe article 1838 Mormon War you nominated as a good article has failed
; see Talk:1838 Mormon War for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Penultimate supper -- Penultimate supper (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Repeated deletion of well-sourced material
editA thread has been opened at WP:FTN about your recent behavior. The proper procedure is for you to self-revert your deletion and instead build a consensus for the change. Feoffer (talk) 02:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- You're wrong on the facts. Your angry reaction is only natural, but your personal attacks are unacceptable. After the dust settles you owe Epachamo an apology. Gottagitgud (talk) 02:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:Joseph Smith and the criminal justice system. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Doug Weller talk 09:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Doug Weller, thank you for reaching out, and for the reminder.
- I apologize if my tone in the recent discussion has become overly strong. That was not my intent, and I will certainly be more careful to phrase my concerns in a less confrontational manner moving forward.
- I do want to point out that I have consistently maintained a focus exclusively on content and sourcing, and I have never questioned the motives of any other editor.
- I can confirm that the editor I have been replying to, however, made and then retracted accusations concerning my motives (specifically alleging that I am a "single-purpose account," conspiring with another user, pushing a POV, etc.).
- My intention remains simply to ensure that claims in the article are supported by verifiable, high-quality sources, and I hope we can all continue the discussion on that basis. Regards. Gottagitgud (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criminal charges against Joseph Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assault and battery.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
