Glowr Curt Ryder

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. For this reason, the use of AI writing tools for the creation or rewriting of articles, alongside their usage to generate images, sources or comments, save for a few exceptions, is generally prohibited. LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.

As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can , and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! ASUKITE 01:33, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Note - I'm not sure if Glanadda looks all that much like it was LLM-generated, but put the welcome above just in case as another editor tagged it. The refs were clearly made with our auto cite tool, which is not a problem (always good to fix them eventually, but still much better than a bare URL) ASUKITE 01:42, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi thanks for your response, I do admit to sometimes using a LLM for help finding reliable sources and notable sources. I did try to make sure that Glanadda was written inline with Wiki's language and style. I just ask LLM for help with research and spelling. And sources to publish. I did use it for some of the article and I was wrong to on Upper Bangor. But I will rewrite the article in my sandbox and then see if I can publish it again. I make sure going forward I use LLM as helpful and not copy and paste in parts. Thanks for your response. Glowr Curt Ryder. Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 12:18, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

@Asukite if you would like to check my newest page: Garth, Gwynedd and give me some feedback. Feel free to. Thanks Glowr Curt Ryder. Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

There are a lot of claims that are failing verification upon checking sources, sentence fragments and an overall lack of cohesion, and a lot of overly wordy phrasing that could be significantly trimmed. I'm still not sure. ASUKITE 16:31, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. I will have a look into it. But I will say that nothing was pasted using AI. That is not true, I have written it from start to finish. I will check the sources. But I can assure you. AI had zero play in phrasing or making each sentence. I did mention in my summary I used AI to find reliable sources and verify a few things. But I have typed the whole article word for word. So I would dispute AI being used as you tagged for the whole article. I used it for finding sources and verifying information. That was it. Regards Glowr Curt Ryder Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 16:33, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

It might be ideal for the article to be moved to draft so that the sourcing can be worked on, as unverified claims are problematic, regardless of whether AI was used. ASUKITE 16:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

I have just made some more tweaks and added more sources for parts. It might be okay now. Source wise. Is the whole AI thing being added to almost all new articles now? Other than my ones? If you don't mind me asking? Since I am new here. Thanks Glowr Curt Ryder Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Just articles that have issues. I left a note at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard#Garth, Gwynedd so somebody with more experience than myself can double-check everything. Sorry for that - I am still new at this sort of thing. Hopefully that will help alleviate any concerns. ASUKITE 17:01, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I understand scrutiny happens. I only used AI for finding reliable sources and for using them for each thing I written. But I guess without an AI checker tool. It is hard to find or tag. Thank you kindly anyway, as I am new to this too. Thanks Glowr Curt Ryder Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello

Hello :) ~2026-22274-74 (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello there Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 20:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Upper Bangor moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Upper Bangor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 07:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for your message. I am going to work on Upper Bangor on my own sandbox, and make necessary changes and have it inline with Wiki's style and notability. I will if your okay to, I'll ping you. You can review it and let me know if your happy for it to be published? So you have had a chance to read it? If your okay with that? Thanks Glowr Curt Ryder. Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 12:20, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

@Scope creep if you would like to check my newest page: Garth, Gwynedd and give me some feedback. Feel free to. Thanks Glowr Curt Ryder. Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Garth, Gwynedd

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Garth, Gwynedd, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Where in particular please? Which section? Thanks Glowr Curt Ryder Glowr Curt Ryder (talk) 14:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garth, Gwynedd (May 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Unchecked sources that do not support the text and no obvious changes since draftification. Three source issues are highlighted below, there are others. This illustrates why we have WP:NEWLLM and will require considerable effort to correct. LLM saves zero time in the end. If submitted without a full rewrite, there is a possibility that the article will be rejected.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Garth, Gwynedd to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Glowr Curt Ryder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Bryntwrog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryntwrog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryntwrog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

M kuhner (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Glowr Curt Ryder! The thread you created at the Teahouse, New here, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2026 (UTC)