George13lol2

Welcome!

Hello, George13lol2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Requiem II (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pearl (singer)

Hello George13lol2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pearl (singer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Stage Boom (season 2) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stage Boom (season 2), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 07:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official poster for Stage Boom (season 2).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official poster for Stage Boom (season 2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stage Boom (season 2)

Hello, George13lol2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stage Boom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 7+Up. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jini (singer) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not show that she satisfies any of the musical notability criteria individually.

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jini (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, George13lol2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fly-Up Regular Edition CD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fly-Up Regular Edition CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fly-Up Regular Edition CD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fly-Up Regular Edition CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Issues you introduced to N.SSign

Hello. There are multiple issues you introduced with your edits to N.SSign that I'd like to address so you can avoid making the same edits on other articles in future.

• There is zero need to add columns for charts that an artist did not chart on. It does not matter if other sections have those same columns—they don't need to be in every section. It doesn't matter if they didn't chart with a single in Korea—Korea does not need to be a column until they have charted with a single there.
• If a chart column has no values except a note, change the column into a column for the chart that the artist did appear on. There is no imperative to have the column represent the main chart of the country and any exceptions to that be notes if they never appeared on the main chart for entries in that section.
• Do not use small text where the text size is already reduced. By using small text in Template:Hidden you have made the text size below 85%, which is a violation of MOS:SMALL. (This also means do not use small text in infoboxes and navigational templates.)
• Avoid using colspans in the middle of tables per MOS:COLHEAD. N.SSign do not have that many singles that we even need to separate their Korean or Japanese releases yet anyway.
• Reconsider including full track lists on articles if the EPs/albums do not have articles, especially as using Template:Hidden runs afoul of MOS:NOHIDE. If the EPs or albums are not significant enough to have their own articles, then we really don't need to include track listings for them anywhere else. Yes, I'm aware plenty of K-pop articles list the track listings for albums that don't have articles, but they don't need to, and you didn't need to add them here.
• See our guidelines on capitalisation per MOS:CT. We do not capitalise the first letters of prepositions in the middle of titles.
• There is no need to re-format citations other editors have edited to articles you did not create. I don't think you needed to re-format the citations I added to that article before you edited it yesterday. Please reconsider whether you really need to be doing this going forward.

Thank you. Ss112 08:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

I was in the middle of editing the page when you submitted your edit, and I wasn't notified of any edit conflict so any changes you made were essentially replaced by mine. As for your other points I'll keep note of them. George13lol2 (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

...? You haven't edited the article since I last did half an hour ago, so nothing has been "replaced". Oh, you mean yesterday. Never mind. Ss112 09:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Didn't enter the Oricon Albums Chart?

Nmixx didn't enter the Oricon Albums Chart with Fe3O4: Break?? Did you look at the second page of the chart? It's at number 17: . Ss112 03:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dash (Nmixx song) (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more in-depth coverage than just announcements that the song came out and basic details. I recommend looking for reviews. Try taking a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dash (Nmixx song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dash (Nmixx song) has been accepted

Dash (Nmixx song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 02:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NCT Wish - Wish.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NCT Wish - Wish.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Chuang Asia: Thailand Episode summary from our wiki

Hi there! you seem to be the one mostly on that page, so i'm writing as it turns out a user (100.38.78.122) added episode 1 and 2 uses our wikis (https://produce-camp.fandom.com/wiki/Produce_Camp_Asia:_Thailand/Episodes/Episode_1 & https://produce-camp.fandom.com/wiki/Produce_Camp_Asia:_Thailand/Episodes/Episode_2) summary of said episodes, and would ask if you guys could rewrite it, as she has been working hard on covering the show. Meipon (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I've hidden the Episodes section in the article for now. We'll add it back once the episodes summaries are re-written. George13lol2 (talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Meipon (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gen1es logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gen1es logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kep1going has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kep1going. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kep1going has been accepted

Kep1going, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BoyNextDoor - Earth, Wind & Fire.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BoyNextDoor - Earth, Wind & Fire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sticky (Kiss of Life song) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sticky (Kiss of Life song). Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Inside Out (single album) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Inside Out (single album). Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Hands Up (NCT New Team song)

Do you think it's necessary to specify the difference in lyricist credits for the Korean version of Hands Up in its article? If so, what's the best way to go about that?

• H. Toyosaki

Maybe something like that? RachelTensions (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Can't access my PC for the next few days so I can't see what you did but you can refer to how I did it in Wish (NCT Wish song). George13lol2 (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Never mind I've made the change but you can use that as a reference for future articles. George13lol2 (talk) 00:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Babymonster - Drip.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Babymonster - Drip.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Drip (album) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Drip (album). Thanks! 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drip (album) has been accepted

Drip (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 18:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Japanese "single album"

Hey, I know the concept of a single album is exclusively South Korean, but how would you categorize something like Tomorrow X Together's Chikai? Seems widely reported to be a single album, and has three tracks, none of which are specifically named just "Chikai" (誓い). But, it charted in Japan on the singles chart, not the album chart.

Is it common to have a single be titled differently than any of the songs contained on it? RachelTensions (talk) 23:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Yes it is common for a single to be titled differently from its lead track. Other examples include Kep1er's Japanese releases such as "Wing Wing", marketed as "Fly-Up". For these releases we simply refer to them as maxi singles marketed with a different title. George13lol2 (talk) 01:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Young Posse

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Young Posse, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Sophia Laforteza

Hello! I recently added Draft:Sophia_Laforteza to the mainspace momentarily, just to receive copyedits and as a litmus test for if it would be accepted (it did not meet notable requirements). I was wondering what are the exact requirements for notability as per WP:BANDMEMBER. I had a minimum of 3 sources that did not have simple passing mentions, but entirely about the subject. Therefore, I just wanted feedback and further calrification on what is exactly needed to meet notability requirements.

Thank you for your edits and help! Warmtoned 🕯 talk! 22:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@Warmtoned Hello. Typically for a member of a group to be notable enough to qualify for a separate article, he/she will need to have adequate activities outside of said group. Sophia's only activity outside of Katseye/Dream Academy is a single appearance on a game show in 2022, which would definitely not be enough for anyone to get an article.

I also noticed that you moved the content from the article in the mainspace to draft via cut and paste, which you've done the same moving the draft to mainspace. This is undesirable as it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. In the future you may request for a page to be moved back to draft instead. George13lol2 (talk) 23:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Le Sserafim - Crazy (Japanese version).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Le Sserafim - Crazy (Japanese version).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 Chinese television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 Chinese television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 Chinese television series endings

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 Chinese television series endings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 Thai television series endings

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 Thai television series endings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 Thai television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 Thai television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 disestablishments in Southeast Asia

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 disestablishments in Southeast Asia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 disestablishments in Asia

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 disestablishments in Asia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories

Hello, George13lol2,

Please be careful when assigning categories to an article. Make sure that the categories are existing categories and that they are spelled appropriately. Do not randomly change categories, when you assign a category to an article assume it should be in that category for its lifetime. Thank you. 06:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 television series endings

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 television series endings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 establishments in China

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 establishments in China indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:05, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 establishments in Thailand

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 establishments in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 disestablishments in China

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 disestablishments in China indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2025 disestablishments in Thailand

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 disestablishments in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chuang Asia S2 Audition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chuang Asia S2 Audition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Musical groups established in 2025

A tag has been placed on Category:Musical groups established in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Produce Camp 2024 promotional poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Produce Camp 2024 promotional poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: KickFlip (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KickFlip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Red Swan poster

Would you to upload a better version of File:Red Swan (TV series) poster.png? 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 22:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

I originally posted this discussion here by mistake. It has been moved to the correct location at Talk:The Ink Spots#Jim Nabbie joined the Ink Spots in 1945.

(JammerPro (talk) 02:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC))

I originally posted this discussion here by mistake. It has been moved to the correct location at Talk:The Ink Spots#Jim Nabbie joined the Ink Spots in 1945.

(JammerPro (talk) 02:45, 20 May 2025 (UTC))

CS1 error on KTM Intercity

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page KTM Intercity, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Johor Bahru–Singapore Rapid Transit System

Hi George,

Thanks for your edits on the above page. Your edits are obviously made in good faith; thanks for that. To reciprocate that good faith; Can you help understanding please of your edits in the intro section of the above page? E.g.,

1) My humble understanding is effective writing is based on using short words, short sentences and short paragraphs. For what reason is it beneficial to merge 2 lucid short sentences into 1 long sentence?

2) Why remove the short info that was included listing the keyt strategy change in the history of the project?

Thanks for any help.

Using several short sentences to describe something is not "effective writing". It becomes repetitive, affects the flow of reading, and sounds awkward when spoken out.

I'm ok with providing a brief history of the RTS link in the lead section, so long as it's further summarised. I just believed at that time that it wasn't notable enough to be in the lead section. George13lol2 (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi George,

I hope you are doing OK and thanks for your reply.

"Using several short sentences to describe something is not "effective writing". It becomes repetitive, affects the flow of reading, and sounds awkward when spoken out."

You sure about that? There's plenty content out there recommending using short sentences. What flows for the writer doesn't necessarily flow for the reader. Hence the value of using short manageable chunks of info to empower info digestion by the reader.

As an example, your current wording:

"The Johor Bahru–Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link is an upcoming 4 km (2.5 mi) long international twin-track rapid transit system crossing the Strait of Johor. It will link Johor Bahru, Malaysia at Bukit Chagar station with Singapore at Woodlands North station, the latter connecting with the MRT station of the same name. The line is planned to open in December 2026.

To provide a seamless pre-boarding clearance, both stations on the line will each house customs, immigration and quarantine (CIQ) facilities for both countries, which will be independent from the existing CIQs at the Sultan Iskandar Building and Woodlands Checkpoint.

When completed, the RTS Link will replace the existing KTM Intercity Shuttle Tebrau service between JB Sentral and Woodlands Train Checkpoint stations by June 2027."

Sentence lengths there are:

Sentence 1 - 28 words

Sentence 2 - 27 words

Sentence 3 - 8 words

Sentence 4 - 39 words

Sentence 5 - 25 words

Don't you feel for example that sentences 1, 2 and 5 would be better halved, and that sentence 4 would be better divided into 3?

Thanks again for any constructive opinion you have. 103.216.223.36 (talk) 04:44, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the reply. I understand where you're coming from. However, I'm not sure why you think any of those sentence structure will work better.

The first sentence is only long because the name of the rail line is long, and thus should not be put into consideration when looking at the length of the sentence. If you instead abbreviated it, the previous phrasing would be "The RTS is a 4 km long international twin-track rapid transit system. The RTS crosses the Strait of Johor." That just seems silly.

For the second sentence, are you suggesting for "the latter connecting with the MRT station of the same name" to be split into a separate sentence? That's fine if this article is on the Woodlands North station, but this article is about the RTS line, so why have a sentence in the lead section solely describing a station on the line.

For the fourth sentence, I would say that the line "which will be independent from the existing CIQs at the Sultan Iskandar Building and Woodlands Checkpoint" isn't necessary at all and has no reason to be included to begin with since those existing custom facilities aren't even within the same building as the ones for the RTS. "To provide a seamless pre-boarding clearance, both stations on the line will each house CIQ facilities for both countries" - I believe that this is perfectly fine. There's no need for a separate sentence stating the obvious "That co-location is intended to provide seamless pre-boarding clearance."

Why would the fifth sentence need to be divided.

"What flows for the writer doesn't necessarily flow for the reader. Hence the value of using short manageable chunks of info to empower info digestion by the reader." That may be true but it's also excessive to break down every single bit of detail into its own sentence. Simple English Wikipedia exists specifically for something like that. George13lol2 (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi George,

Thanks for your reply. I'm not ignoring you. I need to find sufficient spare time to give your reply the respect it deserves. When I get that time, I'll respond. 103.216.223.37 (talk) 07:05, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi again George,

1) "I'm not sure why you think any of those sentence structure will work better."

Shorter sentences (and paragraphs), give the reader easier content digestibility (by giving the reader easier to absorb shorter info chunks). I recall at the time I did my Effective Writing training, someone in the class made the point of advocating for long sentences to allow flow. That point was was discredited by the instructor. The instructor instead made the point that what flows for writer, doesn't necessarily flow for the reader. Readers face the challenge of interpreting the writer's output. The ABC of Effective Writing was taught as"

A = Accuracy B = Brevity C = Clarity

The 2 keys tools advocated to achieve that were:

a) Target average (note average, not exact), sentence length = 14 words b) Use active rather than passive phrasing

e.g. Use:

George reset the password

Don't use:

The password was reset by George

2) "The first sentence is only long because the name of the rail line is long, and thus should not be put into consideration when looking at the length of the sentence."

Its still a long sentence.

3) "If you instead abbreviated it, the previous phrasing would be "The RTS is a 4 km long international twin-track rapid transit system. The RTS crosses the Strait of Johor." That just seems silly."

I'd need to look at the history again. I can't though be bothered (for the moment at least), trawling through the article history. I'm quietly confident though more optimal wording could be put together.

4) "For the second sentence, are you suggesting for "the latter connecting with the MRT station of the same name" to be split into a separate sentence? That's fine if this article is on the Woodlands North station, but this article is about the RTS line, so why have a sentence in the lead section solely describing a station on the line."

There'd be more than 1 way to word it. I see though some others have made some tweaks to the article summary. I confess my focus has been moved onto other things currently. Hence please forgive me for not proposing a solution just now.

5) "::For the fourth sentence, I would say that the line "which will be independent from the existing CIQs at the Sultan Iskandar Building and Woodlands Checkpoint" isn't necessary at all and has no reason to be included to begin with since those existing custom facilities aren't even within the same building as the ones for the RTS. "To provide a seamless pre-boarding clearance, both stations on the line will each house CIQ facilities for both countries" - I believe that this is perfectly fine. There's no need for a separate sentence stating the obvious "That co-location is intended to provide seamless pre-boarding clearance.""

Then remove the superfluous text if it hasn't been removed already?

6) "Why would the fifth sentence need to be divided."

Because the sentence is unnecessarily long.

7) "That may be true but it's also excessive to break down every single bit of detail into its own sentence."

Fair comment. Hence the point above re average sentence length.

I hope this message reciprocates the same polite and respectful tone you have exhibited. Very best wishes to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.245.113.228 (talk) 03:54, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

List of Singapore MRT stations

Hello,

First of all, I'd like to thank you for editing in good faith, especially for List of Singapore MRT stations. I've noticed that you have reverted one of my edits, which concerns with the history of the MRT. I don't exactly know what's the problem with it, is it the inclusion of the history of the MRT or is it that such content should not warrant its own section? If it's the former, other rail FLs include an overview of their history, such as List of Vancouver SkyTrain stations and List of SacRT light rail stations. If the issue concerns with the latter, I did that since I believe the history of the MRT is big enough to warrant its own section, though am willing to move to the lead if it can be reasonably summarised. Icepinner 09:09, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ice,

I believe that a section on its history is unnecessary as List of Singapore MRT stations is already a pretty large article on its own. Other lists articles on rail stations benefit from having a history section as the lists themselves are significantly smaller in comparison. I am fine with having a brief summary of the history in the lead section though. George13lol2 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Great, thanks for clarifying! I shall act accordingly. Icepinner 10:41, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Young Miko x Katseye

FYI: Young Miko's collaboration with Katseye is on "Gabriela", not "Gnarly". Wracking ^talk! 18:50, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Oops I was high last night apologies. George13lol2 (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Blackpink discography

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Blackpink discography, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:28, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Singapore MRT lines

Hi George, just noticed your edits on List of Singapore MRT lines. FYI, I'm currently rewriting the article in my sandbox and plan to TNT the page, so hope that's okay with you. Icepinner 15:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Hey. Yes that's fine. George13lol2 (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Woodlands Bus Depot

Hello George13lol2, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Woodlands Bus Depot, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 12:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

"Standardise"

Writing "standardise" as an edit summary implies what you've done—write "includes x and x" in the visible text—is a "standard". There is no "standard" for how to represent combined sales and what elements go into them across all K-pop articles. There is certainly no consistency that I've seen considering I add them every week, so your claim of "standardis[ing]" anything is incorrect. If it's your personal preference or you're making it consistent on the page, then you should probably say "consistency" instead. Skyversay (talk) 03:18, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

I can write "consistent with other related articles" by your definition of "standardise". I can also write "standardise within page" per your definition of "consistency", which is very clearly what I was refering to. They're synonymous with each other. Per Cambridge's definition, a standard can either be "an official rule", or "usual rather than special", meaning the word "standard" can mean either an officially set protocol, or simply following the norm. If there is indeed an official standard that applys to all K-pop related articles, I would link the discussion/information page in my edit summary. I've also been updating charts and sales references every week so idk why you think you know more than I do. George13lol2 (talk) 03:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

You just quoted me the dictionary definition of "standardise" then you tell me you think I'm the one acting like I know more than the other. Please have some self-awareness with how hypocritical that is. I don't "think" I know more than you do, I was relating an anecdote about not encountering any consistency in this matter contrary to you claiming you're "standardising" something on one page. There is no standard with related articles is my point, which you seem to have missed. Skyversay (talk) 04:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

I mentioned that I'm aware there is no standard for all K-pop related articles, which YOU seem to have missed. I've been regularly updating chart/sales references on multiple articles and have never even seen any other article that formats the chart citation like how it's done in Babymonster. I also mentioned that me writing "standardise" in my edit summary very clearly meant standardising within the page for consistency. Do I need to repeat myself again on the definition of the word? This is simply a matter of you misunderstanding the word, and I gave you an official definition to show that "standardise" is not an incorrect term. George13lol2 (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Future developments in Singapore

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Future developments in Singapore, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:JS2A MRT station. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:36, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

ZKang123, Sgwikicontributor and Seloloving, I am mass-pinging you to make you aware of the cut-and-paste Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I did tag the fact that I've copied the content on the draft talk page but forgot to label on the main page talk page. Or perhaps it'll be better to delete the draft page and move the main page instead? George13lol2 (talk) 09:48, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

That's fine by me too Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:48, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Beauty World Bus Interchange moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Beauty World Bus Interchange. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the interchange is not yet operational. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Cortis

Template:Cortis has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 19:21, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks to your contributions and comments, List of Singapore MRT stations is now FL! Have a brownie as a token of gratitude. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 04:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)