Welcome!

edit
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, G13 vs G14, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Grnrchst (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Roblox Schlep ban controversy for deletion

edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roblox Schlep ban controversy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roblox Schlep ban controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shooting of Rylan Wilder for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shooting of Rylan Wilder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of Rylan Wilder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Riley Williams.png

edit

A tag has been placed on File:Riley Williams.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

August 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Riley Williams, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Meters (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mackenzie Shirilla

edit

Hello G13 vs G14,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mackenzie Shirilla for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:23, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pirate Wires for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pirate Wires is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirate Wires until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Riley Williams for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riley Williams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Williams (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unpacked (website) (+ minor edits)

edit

Hi there! I have deleted Unpacked (website) in mainspace, so feel free to move your draft.

Additionally, I noticed you recently marked an edit as "minor" when it may not have been. On Wikipedia, the "minor edit" feature should be used only when an edit cannot be construed to change the meaning of the article's content, such as fixing typos or correcting formatting. Using this feature correctly helps maintain transparency and ensures other editors can accurately assess the nature of your edits. For future edits, please ensure that you only mark truly minor changes as "minor." If you have any questions or need clarification, feel free to reach out or review the Wikipedia guideline on minor edits. Thanks for your understanding and continued contributions! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! G13 vs G14 (talk) 14:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest policy

edit

Information icon Hello, G13 vs G14. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Hipal (talk) 20:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please do not translate ref names the way you do

edit

It makes it impossible to find the title later on. If you translate the article title to english, do it in the trans-title= parameter, but always keep the original language title. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

alright... G13 vs G14 (talk) 13:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Palestine Chronicle

edit

Hi there! I want to let you know that I deleted Palestine Chronicle from mainspace, so feel free to move your draft at your leisure. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you again, really appreciate it. G13 vs G14 (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
G13 vs G14, Significa liberdade, I'm sure that there was a good reason for the above action, but, given the extreme sensitivity of the topic area, it would be best to state it. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Phil Bridger! Can you explain your concern? Palestine Chronicle was previously a redirect. G13 vs G14 had created a draft in userspace, then requested the redirect be deleted so they could move their userspace draft there. G13 vs G14 is an extended confirmed editor, so they are within their bounds to write about the Arab–Israeli conflict. Now that the article is in mainspace, it will be reviewed by someone in NPP. If you have specific issues with the article, feel free to raise them on the talk page (though I'm happy to hear them here, as well). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't have any concern now that you have said that it was a redirect. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Donald Trump feces video for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump feces video is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump feces video until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Howard🌽33 10:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi G13 vs G14. Thank you for your work on Code Violet. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There are a number of unreliable sources in this article, these include NoobFeed, GamerBraves, Noisy Pixel and GameCentral. Please remove or replace these sources. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi G13 vs G14. Thank you for your work on All That's Interesting. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this article on a news website that has shown sustained coverage in a variety of sources. A little more copy editing prior to publishing would have been helpful,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Recommendation to nominate Roblox–Schlep controversy for GA

edit

Your detail to the article Roblox–Schlep controversy looks really good, and I want to recommend if you want to nominate it for status. Information on how to do it is on Wikipedia:Good article instructions and Wikipedia:Good article criteria. - RTSthestardust (talk) 14:41, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is for your contributions related to the 2026 Iran war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 20:11, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Wow! Thank you. G13 vs G14 (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Morgan Geyser

edit

Information icon Hello, G13 vs G14. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morgan Geyser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Flag of the Islamic State page

edit

Thank you so much for making this page!!! I moved it to "Flag of the Islamic State" because its more consistent with other Islamic State-related pages. Militant.Insurgency (talk) 04:17, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi G13 vs G14. Thank you for your work on Unpacked (website). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article! Have a blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawn Contact me! 14:13, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

G6 for TheGamer

edit

Hello @G13 vs G14. I declined the G6 for TheGamer. The redirect was created in 2019 after an AFD discussion for a previous iteration of the article. The version you currently have in draft space is quite different than the deleted version and addresses the concerns from the AFD, but given that the prior version was deleted in an AFD I would like to see an AFC reviewer accept the draft before the redirect gets deleted and the draft gets moved over, otherwise NPP will likely tag it as G4. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Because this article is substantially different, the speedy deletion will be declined. I think this is unnecessary G13 vs G14 (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply