G000p10

Raj era sources

Please stop using Raj era sources, such as Imperial Gazetteers, as references; these are not considered WP:Reliable sources as explained at WP:RAJ. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kasi (Pashtun tribe) , but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
As was clearly explained above, we do not consider Raj era sources, such as Imperial Gazetteers, WP:Reliable sources - Arjayay (talk) 09:55, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saidu Baba. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi,

I’m a bit confused by your message, so I wanted to clarify.

My edit was made in good faith. The earlier version used a blog-style source, so I removed it and replaced it with what I understood to be better sources, including a journal article and other published references.

I’m not engaged in any dispute with anyone, and I haven’t been edit warring — I made the change once after improving the sourcing.

Could you please point out what exactly in my edit you consider disruptive? If there is an issue with a specific source or wording, I’m happy to fix it.

Thanks. G000p10 (talk) 20:50, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics: minimum 500 edits required for editing any article related to caste or social groups

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Sutyarashi (talk) 04:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@G000p10 please pay heed to alerts left at your talk page. You're not allowed to edit topics related to South Asian history, politics or culture until you have atleast 500 edits. Sutyarashi (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peshawar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peshawar was changed by G000p10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859604 on 2026-05-15T19:48:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Also please take a note of the above warning regarding WP:CT/SA. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sutyarashi (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I believe there may be a misunderstanding regarding my edit. I did not remove Hindko or Urdu from the article. I only added Pashto to the language section, as Pashto is also spoken by Swatis, particularly in Battagram, and this was supported by the pakiatan census.

If there are concerns about the reliability of the sources or the wording used, I am happy to discuss them on the article's talk page and work toward consensus. My intention was to improve the accuracy of the language section, not to engage in disruptive editing. G000p10 (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

This was not the only article where you altered content without reference or removed cited material. Also take in account the above warning regarding WP:CT/SA. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:48, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

if there are specific edits that you believe were unsourced or involved the removal of cited material, please identify them individually so they can be discussed on their merits.

Regarding the Swati article, the edit in question added Pashto to the language section based on the existence of Pashto-speaking Swati communities, particularly in Battagram District and parts of Mansehra. No cited material was removed from that section. If there are concerns about it, I am willing to discuss them and seek consensus.

I would appreciate focusing on the specific content under discussion rather than making broad allegations about unrelated edits. G000p10 (talk) 13:54, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sutyarashi (talk) 19:27, 7 June 2026 (UTC)