Frankserafini87

February 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nouvelle cuisine have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nouvelle cuisine was changed by Frankserafini87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87092 on 2024-02-09T00:05:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of sauces

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of sauces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Frankserafini87. Thank you for your work on Batsoà. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for adding this new article. As ever, there's always the option of merging such short stubs into a broader article, like pig's trotter, but for now perhaps we can see how it expands over time!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piedmontese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amaretti. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Frankserafini87. Thank you for your work on Tarte à l'badrée. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for checking! Frankserafini87 (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Suggestions about your contributions at MP Materials

Hi Frankserafini87, Thanks for your work on the MP Materials page! I work for the company, so I can’t edit the page due to my conflict of interest. I think the accuracy of what you did can be improved, so I left some suggestions for your review. I hope you’ll consider them. I left all the details on the Talk page at Talk:MP Materials#Suggestions for editor Thanks for taking a look and for contributing to the page! Tmy350 (talk) 16:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eduardo Viscasillas Blanque

Hello, Frankserafini87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eduardo Viscasillas Blanque, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eduardo Viscasillas Blanque

Hello, Frankserafini87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Eduardo Viscasillas Blanque".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joaquín Agustín Burset Masferrer

Hello, Frankserafini87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joaquín Agustín Burset Masferrer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Mainstream bias moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mainstream bias. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the page. I will revise the entry and resubmit for publishing when it's ready. Frankserafini87 (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

How Countries Go Broke moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to How Countries Go Broke. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Fails WP:NBOOKS also see WP:BKCRYSTAL. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Taabii (talk) 05:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Taabii. I will revise the entry and resubmit for publishing when it's ready. Frankserafini87 (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Please leave descriptive edit summaries that explain your edits

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Talk:Sound of Freedom (film) did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. I have changed some of the WikiProjects you added with your edits because I didn't think they were relevant and didn't understand why you added them, because you didn't provide an edit summary to explain why you added them. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cameron,

Thanks for the reminder. I will remember to include a summary of my edits. Frankserafini87 (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mainstream bias

Hello, Frankserafini87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mainstream bias, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mainstream bias

Hello, Frankserafini87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mainstream bias".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: How Countries Go Broke (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LEvalyn was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Books need at least two published book reviews (in newspapers/magazines) to have a wikipedia article. Please locate some and ideally use them to add a "Reception" section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:How Countries Go Broke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Frankserafini87! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vital Farms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public-benefit corporation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 10:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Please also be aware of the following contentious topics, which you have previously participated in:

• articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles (WP:CT/BLP)
• Falun Gong (WP:CT/FG)

Thank you. — Newslinger talk 10:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks for the above info. I will go ahead and review. Frankserafini87 (talk) 02:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by misinterpreting negative sources as positive ones, as you did at The Epoch Times, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

I cited the source quite accurately. The reason I did not include "conspiracy-fueled" or Epoch's report of the 2020 election is because they are already covered numerous times throughout the article. Since you added them I left it as is. I solely added the word "mainstream" to again keep it as close to the source as possible since it's in the title. Leaving it out would be citing half of the title and violates WP:NPOV. Frankserafini87 (talk) 05:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

The source is very negative, which you whitewashed into nonexistence. Binksternet (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Edit Request - MP Materials Scam Reference Added

Hi @Frankserafini87 -- we've corresponded previously about changes to the MP Materials page, which I cannot edit due to a disclosed COI. Two days ago someone added a fake executive to the "Key People" table -- "Yaketrena Madrigal (CFO)." This, in fact, is not the company's CFO. Ryan Corbett is the company's CFO, as the company's website and Bloomberg show.

Given you are active on Wikipedia and the page, I am hoping you will see this and can make the edit.

I am somewhat concerned whomever added that reference is running some sort of scam. Tmy350 (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Tmy350, I have been inactive on wiki for a while and just now saw your message. I see someone has already reverted the edits. Going forward I will keep an eye on it. Frankserafini87 (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @Frankserafini87 Tmy350 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caron Bernstein, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea, New York was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cavco Industries

The article Cavco Industries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG, relies on primary sources

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:Cavco Industriesthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

PhantomVortex (Contact here) 08:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2026 May#Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration

Hi, there is a move review underway relevant to a discussion you were recently involved in. Link above. Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)