May 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, Faisalisonline2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Faisalisonline (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 14:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

oh the thats also my account and i created this account cuz i lost my faisalisonline account because i forgot my password Faisalisonline2 (talk) 15:12, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph von Eichendorff Memorial (Nysa) (May 27)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Faisalisonline2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Its okay! Thanks a lot though.. Faisalisonline2 (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
edit

Control copyright icon Hello Faisalisonline2! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 12:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the information. I have Removed all copyright from the project and have updated the history so it contains the basic information whilst not going too close to the actual citation. Faisalisonline2 (talk) 13:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph von Eichendorff Memorial (Nysa)

edit

Information icon Hello, Faisalisonline2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph von Eichendorff Memorial (Nysa), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

November 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Docklands Light Railway, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 tweaks made 15:35, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

For info, and this isn't a complaint but rather advice, what Wikipedia is after isn't "proof" - Wikipedia wants reliable sources to verify content. For this reason, for example, certain websites which would be perfectly legitimate proof are disallowed from being used as reliable sources. The BBC is very much not one of those, it's classed as a reliable source. But for example Flickr wouldn't be reliable, despite it being pretty obvious "proof". Again, not a complaint - just a spot of advice for your future contributions :-) Finally, please ensure you add your sources the first time you add content, so editors don't need to revert your additions to get them added. Danners430 tweaks made 15:56, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Danners430 don’t worry I already added citation :) Faisalisonline2 (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph von Eichendorff Memorial (Nysa)

edit

Hello, Faisalisonline2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joseph von Eichendorff Memorial".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

edit

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Great Northern route. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. If you want to move a page in a non-obvious way, it is courteous to find consensus on the talk page. There are no sources calling the Great Northern route the Great Northern Service, especially not as a proper name (see MOS:NCCAPS), so it is not more precise, and it is not more concise because it is an overall longer name. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 17:34, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

+1 to this. If @JacobTheRox had not already done so I would have definitely reverted your move. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I understand sorry ;( Faisalisonline2 (talk) 12:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

icon Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:10mmsocket, you may be blocked from editing. Sugar Tax (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Moorgate station in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Danners430 tweaks made 22:34, 11 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suffragette line

edit

I have reverted your big copy/paste to this redirect article. It should be discussed first. I suggest you take it to somewhere like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport to gain consensus.

Also, for future reference, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for the correct way to copy content from one article to another. It's important that content is properly attributed. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have also done the exact same thing to Lioness line. You should gain consensus for both changes. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please do contribute in the new talk 10mm Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport#Asking to gain consensus of editing the Lioness/Suffragette line pages with new information Faisalisonline2 (talk) 17:56, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Will do and thanks for your understanding. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:58, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

April 2026

edit

Information icon Hi Faisalisonline2! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Turini2 (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Appreciate the feedback! Faisalisonline2 (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply