This is an archive of past discussions with User:Elvisisalive95. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Elvisisalive95! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with Draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Bjelleklang was:
This does not seem to be a style of acting notable enough to warrant its own article. Instead, this should be merged into the article on Nicolas Cage unless multiple sources can be found which discuss it. Keep in mind that the sources should not be in the form of interviews or similar, where his statements are more or less repeated with no commentary.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nouveau Shamanic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nouveau Shamanic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Elvisisalive95!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bjelleklang - talk19:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Elvisisalive95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nouveau Shamanic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it againor request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Special Barnstar
Thank you for being open to discussion and compromise, and for your consideration of sources, policies, and guidelines. I am glad we were able to work together to develop the encyclopedia. Thanks again, Beccaynr (talk) 07:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you! I loved the outcome of our discussion and look forward to working with you in the future! Here’s a freshly baked cookie! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 07:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Metal-Head
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I have a question about your edits to Metal-Head. You reverted the redirect and took off the merge template, saying, "Discussion can’t be closed after just one conclusive vote."
The article had an AfD discussion last week, which you unfortunately didn't participate in. The discussion ended as Merge. I don't like it when articles get redirected either, but you have to go by the results of the AfD discussion. Is there a reason why you're going against the AfD consensus? Toughpigs (talk) 18:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I unfortunately did not see the discussion in question and I would’ve argued that there are sufficient sources which merit Metal-Head remaining its own article. In my experiences on Wikipedia, a discussion cannot be closed after one person conclusively votes & another gives an either or as their vote. I don’t believe the discussion had sufficient time and votes or consensus to have been closed when dealing with such a big removal of content. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree that was probably closed too early; in my opinion, it should have been relisted for another week. If you want to, you can ask people to review the close at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Maybe they'll open it up again. Thanks for your response; I appreciate it. Toughpigs (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by SL93 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Kall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Elvisisalive95!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 00:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Colman2000 (talk) is wishing you a Happy 4th of July! On this day, we recognize our independence from Great Britain with the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, which ultimately paved the way to our freedom. Celebrate this day in many different ways, such as hosting a barbecue, watching baseball games, or even attending a fireworks show! Happy Independence Day, fellow American!
Share this message by adding {{subst:Independence Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Elvisisalive95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James Kall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it againor request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Elvisisalive95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nouveau Shamanic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
