Hi Ekarmanova! I'm so glad you decided to volunteer your time to the encyclopedia. Everyone is welcome here and I hope you enjoy your time spent editing. If you need any assistance, don't hesitate to contact me. You can also seek assistance at the Teahouse. Buster Seven Talk07:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Lehmann Aviation Wing.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
File permission problem with File:Lehmann Aviation UAV kit.png
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Lehmann Aviation UAV kit.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
File permission problem with File:Lehmann Aviation UAV.png
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Lehmann Aviation UAV.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
File permission problem with File:Lehmann Aviation patent Wing.png
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Lehmann Aviation patent Wing.png, which you've sourced to File:Lehmann Aviation Wing.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Ekarmanova,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Lehmann Aviation logo.png, which you've sourced to "sent to me personally". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elbe Philharmonic Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASAA (check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Axel Schoenert Architectes Associes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASAA (check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Axel Schoenert Architectes Associes, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moogle10000 17:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Ekarmanova. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Lehmann Aviation, Ltd.
If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Lehmann Aviation, Ltd}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 17:59, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:
Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I'm declining your appeal because it doesn't in any way address the reasons for your block, namely promotional and likely paid editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Jim, thank you for reviewing the draft. I understand your concern regarding promotional tone and references.
I’d like to clarify that X-1 Jets has received independent coverage in multiple established publications, including:
- AIN Online – coverage of the JetCard launch in June 2025
- Elite Traveler – feature on the $1.5M ACJ TwoTwenty World Tour (2024)
- Ultimate Jet – company profile (2023)
- Private Air New York – article on bespoke experiences
- Luxury Guide USA – coverage of curated private aviation products
These sources are independent, reliable, and secondary — not company press releases. I can rework the draft to:
- Remove promotional language and stick to neutral, encyclopedic tone.
- Focus only on verifiable facts covered by third-party sources.
- Provide proper inline citations.
Would you agree that a revised draft with neutral language and independent sources (like AIN Online and Elite Traveler) could meet Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability standards?
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I respectfully request a review of the permanent block placed on my account. While I understand that Wikipedia maintains strict standards against promotional content, I believe this block is disproportionate and may unintentionally place this organization at a disadvantage compared to competitors who already have published articles.
Specifically:
Companies in the same industry, such as NetJets and VistaJet, have dedicated pages. Preventing the existence of a page on X-1 Jets — despite its coverage in reliable, independent sources such as AIN Online, Elite Traveler, Ultimate Jet, and Luxury Guide USA — creates a perception of unequal treatment.
My intention was not to promote, but to create a factual, neutrally written page supported by secondary sources, in line with Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability policies.
I acknowledge that the original draft may have contained wording that read as promotional. I am willing to fully rewrite the article in strict encyclopedic style, remove all non-independent references, and rely only on third-party coverage.
For these reasons, I respectfully request:
Reconsideration of the permanent block, and restoration of my ability to contribute.
The opportunity to submit a neutral draft in line with Wikipedia’s standards.
This request is made in good faith, with full respect for Wikipedia’s policies and editorial guidelines. My sole aim is to ensure that readers have access to accurate, independently sourced information, consistent with how competitor companies are represented.
Your appeal needs to focus on the benefit to Wikipedia of having you as an editor rather than the commercial disadvantage to your company of maintaining the block. Cabayi (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Axel_Schoenert_Architectes_Associes, you may be blocked from editing. Your article was deleted under the speedy deletion policy. Please do not recreate the page. Moogle10000 17:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
