User talk:EggRoll97/Archive 6

Latest comment: 8 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Tech News: 2026-24
Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Tech News: 2025-06

MediaWiki message delivery 00:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

  • News and notes: Let's talk!
    The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
  • Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
    Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
  • Traffic report: A wild drive
    The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

Edit filter request

Hi EggRoll, could you take a look at this? It got archived due to inactivity, but I'd like an EFM to take a look at it. Thanks Nobody (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

A lot of it seems to depend on independent assessment, so it may be a bad candidate for specifically the edit filter, especially since it's a lot of domains. I'm thinking the title blacklist may be better for this than a filter. EggRoll97 (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
While it needs independent assessment, it's not really complicated. As for blacklisting: I thought about that too, but since copyright violations are most of the time good-faith mistakes, instead of bad faith vandalism, an edit filter sounded more reasonable to me. Nobody (talk) 07:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
I think honestly the best idea would be for any domains that are absolutely not going to be used legitimately to be added to Special:BlockedExternalDomains. Any that have a legitimate use would need some independent assessment, and CopyPatrol does a fair enough job of that. I guess I'm just not necessarily wanting to create a whole new filter for an issue that can far more easily be addressed by just blocking the domains. EggRoll97 (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
This probably should be discussed at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#Discussion to see if admins agree. Nobody (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-07

MediaWiki message delivery 00:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-08

MediaWiki message delivery 21:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections

Administrator Elections | Renewal RFC phase
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello EggRoll97! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Question about reporting repeated vandalism, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-09

MediaWiki message delivery 00:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

  • Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year
    From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
  • Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing
    User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.

Tech News: 2025-10

MediaWiki message delivery 02:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello EggRoll97! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Just making sure, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-12

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

  • From the editor: Hanami
    It's an ecstasy, my spring.
  • Obituary: Rest in peace
    Send not to know
    For whom the bell tolls,
    It tolls for thee.

Tech News: 2025-13

MediaWiki message delivery 22:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

When to threaten a recall

Don't want to do this on the main post, because it's not entirely relevant - but if you're going to threaten to recall somebody for taking a less than optimal tone while trying to correct misinformation about themselves in mainspace, then you should know that would set a dangerous precedent. The relationship between an article writer an a BLP subject will always be fraught. There's a massive power imbalance, for one thing - and that, especially to somebody that the community very clearly decided wasn't actually notable after all, can be terrifying. Going after somebody for not behaving perfectly in such a difficult moment just feels cruel. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 08:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

I don't think the massive power imbalance you're referring to necessarily exists when it comes to an administrator. Even as a BLP subject, an administrator still wields tools that can cause damage, and has more technical power than a regular editor, even if they're "not supposed to" use it. This isn't to mention that administrators are purposefully held to a higher standard, whether they are a BLP subject or not. I would expect an administrator to conduct themselves in a manner befitting a representative of the community, and making disparaging remarks about other editors, such as Is this appropriate handling of complaints about BLP accuracy? Or do I need to shut up and let a bunch of people who apparently don't know how to write a BLP continue to get it wrong? is unacceptable for someone who holds the community's trust. There are better ways to communicate, and this is only the first of many apparent incidents regarding their comments about the community, as evidenced by links and commentary on the main post. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
I think you've mistaken my intent - I'm not here to re-litigate the CU consultation or discuss Tamzin's behaviour in general, especially behind their back in a semi-public forum. Sorry. Swore off that kind of stuff when I graduated the ninth grade. I think we're going to have to fundamentally agree to disagree as to whether or not the fact that somebody is an admin is enough to get over the fact that the other editors (who were also administrators with more technical power than you or I!) did have a large amount of control over the situation. And, speaking generally, I think that if I woke up and found a Wikipedia administrator mistakenly using a hit piece that I'd specifically told them wasn't reliable, then I'd have freaked out and said something a whole lot worse. Which isn't to say the comments were especially kind, or that they should have said it. And you're right, we should hold administrators to a higher standard when it comes to civility. There's just.. a lotta different cases I'd use first. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 02:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

EFH

Hello. I'm considering running again for EFH soon (maybe in a month or two), and would like some advice on how you think it would turn out. I'm pretty active at WP:EFFPR clerking reports, and on WP:EFR creating sample code for other people's ideas for filters. I have suggested some private filters (one to 1169 was implemented and I recently sent one regarding 984 to User:Codename Noreste, though I believe it was later forwarded to the mailing list). Anyways, any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your EFFPR stats seem fine, your filter suggestions are generally fine, and I don't see any issue with the private filters requests. In the EFH request, I'd encourage you to link to at least a few of your public filter requests that were implemented, or code that you suggested that was implemented on a public filter. Best to give any random passersby who might not be able to see private filters the ability to evaluate your technical acumen. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-14

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-15

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

YGM

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I should've said this before, but I've responded via email. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

RfA

Hi there! I saw that you have decided to run for adminship. I did not expect that nom early, considering it has been only 6 months since the last nom. I have supported you before at the AELECT, and I am happy to support you once more here since you have decided to work in an area that few users have specialized on. Good luck with the mop soon! ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-16

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

I've added two late questions if you'd like to answer

Given the pending close of AELECT RfA, I'll confess my two questions are vaguely policy-choice based (translate that as potentially political). Feel free to choose not to answer directly if you wish. Further, I'll consider any statement about either experience as responsive to my question. Q: You are the only wikipedian so far who has experienced both these two separate permissions request processes first-hand. I think people who'd like to contrast the two experiences (like me) would very much value your unique personal vantage point. Good luck in any case. If I can ever be helpful, please call on me. BusterD (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps a debrief, (as we so often do with successful candidates) would be a better platform. But many would be interested. BusterD (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
@BusterD: Thanks for those at the RfA. I think I'll likely do a more in-depth debrief at some point, as I think WP:DEBRIEF could do with more than just successful candidacies. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
No worries. This is a growing time. Lots of real support for a real candidate. Take the critique you're given and profit from it. BusterD (talk) 18:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Great and pertinent answers to my queries at the process. Thank you! BusterD (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Appreciating a good egg

I'm sure you get many egg-cellent puns here so this won't be too egg-citing. I appreciate that you threw yourself into the meat grinder trying to help out. If it had felt like a time for silliness I would have supported with some insanity about you being ideal Admin material because of secretly being an eggplant. From someone who takes editing plants seriously, 🌿MtBotany (talk) 21:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Ha ha. Thanks for the laugh, truly, I needed it. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

An egg roll for you!

The Egg Roll Award
Anyone who goes through the RfA process, which is unmistakably a grueling one--much less two times over--is a hero in my book. Having attained a 2/3rds majority is huge and I have the utmost confidence that you will get the mop at some point :)

You already improved after the first election and I anticipate that you will do even better the next time with the current feedback from the 'crats & the 'Oppose' camp. We can't please everyone, but know that you will always remain a talented and valued editor, mop or not. WP is lucky to have you. That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for this. I can pretty much see where Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EggRoll97 2/Bureaucrat chat is going, so I appreciate this. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
My condolences as well. RFA is a rough way to spend a week, even if you end up mostly unopposed. You appear to have done really well under the pressure, honestly, so I hope you take that as something of a badge of honour. If in the future you decide you're masochistic enough to take a third run at it, please do get nominators - it makes the whole thing so much easier. -- asilvering (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. It was at least nice to know that I was supported by so many people. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
You ARE supported by so many people (not past tense). You'd need to misbehave to lose my support, but I don't see that happening. No, if you take the feedback you DID get and incorporate much of it into your daily process, then you may run when you think you're ready. Get at least one nominator who is well-respected. For me it was eleven years, but for you it would be a much, much shorter time period, IMHO. I think the community is very much interested in your debrief, which I encourage when the heat has died down. BusterD (talk) 22:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Seconding about the debrief. If you'll take advice, EggRoll, I'd suggest writing down a bunch of notes about how you feel about this asap and then burying those notes somewhere for a while. You've had a lot more distance from the elections than you have from the RFA right now, and it would probably be more helpful to future admin hopefuls to read what you think about the processes when they're both somewhat distant. -- asilvering (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll write some down at the moment, and probably take a look back at it in a few weeks to a month or so and make sure it still looks like an accurate reflection. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your request for adminship

Hi EggRoll97, unfortunately, the verdict of the bureaucrat chat about your request for adminship is that consensus does not exist at this time to make you an administrator.

But, on the bright side, you have shifted community opinion in your favor, and heavily, since your admin election result and you have been given plenty of positive feedback for how to improve. Many of those in opposition would like to support, and will happily do so should you make a third attempt with those issues addressed.

So well done for the improved performance. Keep on editing, keep up hope and try again when you're ready. Acalamari 22:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Acalamari. This is a really minor thing, but I just wanted to check, should the result be listed as "unsuccessful" or "no consensus"? Based on prior RFAs ending unsuccessfully after a crat chat (example: Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/MB), I would assume no consensus, but I don't know if you were intentionally using "unsuccessful" instead. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Nevermind, looks like GTrang just fixed it. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Yes, "no consensus" is correct. The answer is that while updating the page, I copied and pasted the existing unsuccessful RfA line and edited that, but forgot to change the terminology to suit yours. So that was my error, nothing more. Acalamari 09:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-17

MediaWiki message delivery 20:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-18

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

  • Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
    Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?

Tech News: 2025-19

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Move close of 2016–2017 video game voice actor strike

Hey there, I noticed that you closed my RM for the 2016-2017 SAG-AFTRA strike, and I have some concerns about the nature of your closing.

Firstly, the other editor (@IgelRM) you mentioned did not outright oppose my RM, and instead just raised concerns about the usage of "SAG-AFTRA" in the title. I responded with my reasoning, and they unfortunately did not reply. However, in your closing note, you assumed (or at the very least, implied) that IgelRM used WP:COMMONNAME in their reply, and as such used it as justification for not moving (or, in other words, a left-field WP:SUPERVOTE).

Secondly, you closed the RM as "not moved", instead of "no consensus". There was not a consensus to keep it as the current title, and a "not moved" close will dissuade others from trying to move it in the future.

I ask you to reverse your closure, or I will seek more opinions at WP:MR. Thank you for your consideration. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

@Jeffrey34555: I meant to click no consensus, thanks for letting me know. Whether IgelRM has stated their intention to outright oppose the RM is irrelevant, as RMs are not votes, but consensus discussions, and IgelRM's argument against usage of SAG-AFTRA in the title applies to both suggested titles in the RM. It is not a supervote to state that an argument is consistent with the principles of WP:COMMONNAME, nor did I imply anything close to their usage of the policy itself, simply that their argument is in line with policy. If you somehow have come to the conclusion that there is consensus to move the page, feel free to open an MR, but I will not be reversing the closure at this time. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. While I still disagree with your reasoning, I've decided against taking it to WP:MR, as I'm currently busy in the real world and don't want to use up time debating something that probably wouldn't matter to me in a few weeks. However, I do appreciate you for moving it to "no consensus", thank you for that. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-20

MediaWiki message delivery 22:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

Tech News: 2025-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello EggRoll97:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Looks like a new user copied your user page

User:YouTubeFans2002. The account was created a few weeks ago, but the user recently filled the user page with barnstars which say "This award is given to EggRoll97". Strange. — Chrisahn (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure is interesting behavior. Thanks for letting me know. EggRoll97 (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-22

MediaWiki message delivery 20:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-23

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Thank you so much for your work on Edit Filters. Really appreciate it! Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Much appreciated, thanks! EggRoll97 (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Have you ever

set aside your feelings and done something very different from what you feel like doing? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Deepfriedokra, I have, many times throughout my life. I'm not sure what specifically you mean by this. EggRoll97 (talk) 09:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Seen and responded to, Deepfriedokra. EggRoll97 (talk) 09:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Excellent. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-24

MediaWiki message delivery 01:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-25

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

EFM

Hi EggRoll,

You're currently the most active non-admin EFM on enwiki right now, so I would just like to get your opinion on me running for EFM maybe one to two weeks from now. I've worked on quite a few filters both private and public in the last three months since my request for EFH was accepted in early april, including 1161 (will not discuss this in public), 1296/1297 (fix weather-related FPs), 869 (add tasnim news), 1163 (fix math tag FPs, which you just implemented), and 547 (will not discuss this either in public).

Thanks – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@PharyngealImplosive7, I think you're fairly well qualified for it. I will note it's only been ~2 months or so since you applied for EFH, which isn't necessarily a deal-breaker for me, though in your EFH request I see I would like to caution you about prematurely applying for EFM as it is a much more selectively granted right. Something else raised in your EFH request is that you have a significant portion of your edits overall in Wikipedia to the EFFPR page, which again, isn't a deal-breaker for me, though may be for others. For example, mine is at 15%, while the rest of my edits lay in other areas of the wiki. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. It has been noted. PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-26

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

New message from 1F616EMO

Hello, EggRoll97. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-06-24/Debriefing.
Message added 12:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1F616EMO (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-27

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-28

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • July 9–15 - Call for candidates
  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-29

MediaWiki message delivery 20:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

Tech News: 2025-30

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello

Please join doscussion on talk page of Male Genital Examination 2A02:C7C:746D:3000:A870:2E3C:B18B:5BCD (talk) 16:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

I decline. Your edits are puerile vandalism, and wishing you could touch someone's pen*s is not an appropriate edit. EggRoll97 (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-31

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-32

MediaWiki message delivery 03:36, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

Tech News: 2025-33

MediaWiki message delivery 23:25, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-35

MediaWiki message delivery 00:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-36

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

Tech News: 2025-37

MediaWiki message delivery 01:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | RFC phase

The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/RFCs.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-38

MediaWiki message delivery 17:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-39

MediaWiki message delivery 22:51, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-40

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

Tech News: 2025-41

MediaWiki message delivery 17:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-42

MediaWiki message delivery 18:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Antoine Garnier

Information icon Hello, EggRoll97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antoine Garnier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-43

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

Your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports

Hello, thanks for your efforts to import edits from the Nostalgia Wikipedia. Importing edits from there is complicated and has only gotten more so over time due to software changes; see my user subpage about it, User:Graham87/Import, but as it happens I only added a note about how out-of-date it was in March 2025, after you received transwiki import rights. Unfortunately Nostalgia Wikipedia imports almost always require importupload permissions these days to do them with usernames/edit histories properly intact; they can only be done properly with transwiki importing if (a) the edit you want to import is the top edit in the Nostalgia Wikipedia history and (b) it was made by either an IP editor or an editor with a username that contains an underline, an initial lowercase letter, or consecutive spaces (i.e. it is affected by T2323). In the case of my second point, to get the usernames transferred over correctly, you need to check the box that says " Assign edits to local users where the named user exists locally". As for your imports themselves, several of them were relatively tangential due to deletions in 2002. Not all the Nostalgia Wikipedia's page history absolutely *has* to be here; some of it only belongs there. re the ones about countries, there are probably about a thousand of those and they're all based on the public domain work The World Factbook. I see that you probably looked through Wikipedia:Usemod article histories to find some of your pages to import; I myself had worked through this list several years ago to see what needed importing, but I'd missed User:Ed_Poor/Learning, so thanks for trying to deal with that one. I actually found your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports while looking at the history of that page, while checking for edits made by Conversion script from January 2005, because they can now be dealt with much more easily after the features mentioned in T382958 made it to this site. See this permalink to my logs related to your imports for my commentary on them. If you see something that you think needs to be imported from the Nostalgia Wikipedia, feel free to either flag it at Wikipedia:Requests for page importation, where I can check it out, or message me directly. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Will do. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports

Hello, thanks for your efforts to import edits from the Nostalgia Wikipedia. Importing edits from there is complicated and has only gotten more so over time due to software changes; see my user subpage about it, User:Graham87/Import, but as it happens I only added a note about how out-of-date it was in March 2025, after you received transwiki import rights. Unfortunately Nostalgia Wikipedia imports almost always require importupload permissions these days to do them with usernames/edit histories properly intact; they can only be done properly with transwiki importing if (a) the edit you want to import is the top edit in the Nostalgia Wikipedia history and (b) it was made by either an IP editor or an editor with a username that contains an underline, an initial lowercase letter, or consecutive spaces (i.e. it is affected by T2323). In the case of my second point, to get the usernames transferred over correctly, you need to check the box that says " Assign edits to local users where the named user exists locally". As for your imports themselves, several of them were relatively tangential due to deletions in 2002. Not all the Nostalgia Wikipedia's page history absolutely *has* to be here; some of it only belongs there. re the ones about countries, there are probably about a thousand of those and they're all based on the public domain work The World Factbook. I see that you probably looked through Wikipedia:Usemod article histories to find some of your pages to import; I myself had worked through this list several years ago to see what needed importing, but I'd missed User:Ed_Poor/Learning, so thanks for trying to deal with that one. I actually found your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports while looking at the history of that page, while checking for edits made by Conversion script from January 2005, because they can now be dealt with much more easily after the features mentioned in T382958 made it to this site. See this permalink to my logs related to your imports for my commentary on them. If you see something that you think needs to be imported from the Nostalgia Wikipedia, feel free to either flag it at Wikipedia:Requests for page importation, where I can check it out, or message me directly. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Will do. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-44

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to the clerk team!

Hi EggRoll97. We have added you to the list of clerks and subscribed you to the mailing list (info: WP:AC/C#clerks-l). Welcome, and I look forward to working with you! To adjust your subscription options for the mailing list, see the link at mail:clerks-l. The mailing list works in the usual way, and the address to which new mailing list threads can be sent is clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Useful reading for new clerks is the procedures page, WP:AC/CP, but you will learn all the basic components of clerking on-the-job.

New clerks begin as a trainee, are listed as such at WP:AC/C#Personnel, and will remain so until they have learned all the aspects of the job. When you've finished training, which usually takes a few months (and a maximum of one year), then we'll propose to the Committee that you be made a full clerk. As a clerk, you'll need to check your e-mail regularly, as the mailing list is where the clerks co-ordinate (a on-wiki clerks' noticeboard also exists but is not used nearly as much). If you've any questions at any point of your traineeship, simply post to the mailing list.

Lastly, it might be useful if you enter your timezone into WP:AC/C#Personnel (in the same format as the other members have), so that we can estimate when we will have clerks available each day; this is, of course, at your discretion. Again, welcome! Regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 22:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Codename Noreste (discusscontribs) 22:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Replied via email. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
I replied back to you. Codename Noreste (discusscontribs) 23:11, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
 Done EggRoll97 (talk) 23:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-45

MediaWiki message delivery 19:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification re the lb/arb

Yes, I was very confused on the lightbreather arbitration. As I've said elsewhere many times, I have studiously and intentionally avoided and stayed ignorant of, as much as possible, the many and varied bureaucracies that exist on WP. I fall down rabbit holes easily; the bureaucracies are a 'minefield of rabbit holes' for me, so avoidance is paramount. But this one indirectly involved me, so I had to participate (incorrectly, in more ways than one, but that's par). cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

By the way - since I trimmed out (in order to get below the word count) my blathering in my response about the misplaced comment and my confusion in that regard, your mention in the 'clerk notes' now probably appears non-sequitur. If you'd like to remove it to avoid further confustication, I'm fine with it. Or if it needs to stay put, that's fine too of course! cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

Tech News: 2025-46

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

File mover granted

Hello EggRoll97. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 16:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025 administrator elections - schedule

  • The December 2025 administrator elections are set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Nov 25 – Dec 1: Candidate sign-up
    • Dec 4 – Dec 8: Discussion phase
    • Dec 9 – Dec 15: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-47

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Antoine Garnier

Hello, EggRoll97. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Antoine Garnier".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello EggRoll97:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-48

MediaWiki message delivery 15:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections - Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • November 25 – December 1 - Call for candidates
  • December 4–8 - Discussion phase
  • December 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Tech News: 2025-49

MediaWiki message delivery 18:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Leones FC logo Columbia.png

Hi! I just recently noticed that you moved the file [[File:Leones FC logo.png]] to [[File:Leones FC logo Columbia.png]]. Just a small correction: please change "Columbia" to "Colombia" (it's the proper name of the country), or perhaps change the name to [[File:Itagüí Leones logo.png]] (the current name of the club).

Thanks! Brayan Jaimes (talk) 12:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

I have done so to Colombia. Thought I had the country name right, apologies. EggRoll97 (talk) 00:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-50

MediaWiki message delivery 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections - Voting Phase

The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-51

MediaWiki message delivery 19:00, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

Happy holidays!

A golden Wikipedia logo with stars, balloons, and the words "New Year"
Happy holidays and a prosperous 2026!

Happy holidays, EggRoll! I am really glad that you threw your hat into the ring for arbclerking, and while boxes ticked is not the measure of one's contributions, I still feel it is worth calling out that you have the most boxes ticked on the clerk checklist. I can't wait to see what reforms and improvements you bring to the team later down the line! The best to you and yours in 2026 :)

Four egg rolls on a plate

HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:49, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-52

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol

New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

  • The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
  • The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
  • Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
  • Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-03

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

Apologies for reverting you at Sound of Hope

i missed the fact the ct has been rescinded.Doug Weller talk 19:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

All good, no worries! EggRoll97 (talk) 04:58, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-04

MediaWiki message delivery 20:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

"The Beekeeper (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Beekeeper (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 23 § The Beekeeper (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. I2Overcome talk 02:31, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-05

MediaWiki message delivery 21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

Tech News: 2026-06

MediaWiki message delivery 17:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-07

MediaWiki message delivery 23:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-08

MediaWiki message delivery 19:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Tech News: 2026-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-10

MediaWiki message delivery 17:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-11

MediaWiki message delivery 18:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Tech News: 2026-12

MediaWiki message delivery 19:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Opinion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Consistently being unconstrutive between multiple Wikipedia editors.

Hi EggRoll97. Since you opened discussion in ANI before which is related with Livelikemusic's behaviour, I would like to hear your additional opinion about his attitude towards to other Wikipedia editors, including me. Please feel free to share your opinion, and note that I'm not forcing you to share your opinion in there. Thank you! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 15:50, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-13

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-14

MediaWiki message delivery 19:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

Tech News: 2026-15

MediaWiki message delivery 16:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-16

MediaWiki message delivery 15:17, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Query regarding "true positive"

You recently marked the edit filter my edit triggered as a "true positive" (diff). I have no issue with that decision, since the change I was trying to implement (removal of incorrect attribution to me) has been implemented, although I experienced a brief moment of panic. However, I would appreciate it if you could point me to the policy, guideline, or essay my edit violated. I understand if you can't provide exact details per BEANS, but I would appreciate a general idea of what was done incorrectly so I can avoid repeating this mistake. Thanks. Unstirredshading23 (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

By true positive I mean moreso that the filter was working as intended and that there wasn't really an edit that needed to be made to the filter, not necessarily that your edit violated policy. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:39, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-17

MediaWiki message delivery 14:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-18

MediaWiki message delivery 18:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
  • May 8–12: Discussion phase
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-19

MediaWiki message delivery 20:41, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-20

MediaWiki message delivery 19:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello EggRoll97,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-21

MediaWiki message delivery 20:19, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

Mediation

I appreciate you mediation effort and thanks you for this FunnyBunny123.0 (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-22

MediaWiki message delivery 21:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-23

MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-24

MediaWiki message delivery 21:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)